A case of local recurrence following transanal total mesorectal excision: a new form of port-site metastasis?

Correspondence

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

The procedure performed was in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research Committee.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained.

References

  1. 1.
    Emmertsen KJ, Laurberg S (2012) Low anterior resection syndrome score: development and validation of a symptom-based scoring system for bowel dysfunction after low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Ann Surg 255(5):922–928CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Perdawood SK, Thinggaard BS, Bjoern MX (2017) Effect of transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: comparison of short-term outcomes with laparoscopic and open surgeries. Surg Endosc.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5926-x PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Perdawood SK, Al Khefagie GA (2016) Transanal vs laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: initial experience from Denmark. Colorectal Dis 18(1):51–58CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Martinez J, Targarona EM, Balague C et al (2016) Port site metastasis. An unresolved problem in laparoscopic surgery. A review. Int Surg J 80(4):315–321Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wexner SD, Cohen SM (1995) Port site metastases after laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cure of malignancy. Br J Surg 82(3):295–298CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Franklin ME Jr, Liang S, Russek K (2013) Integration of transanal specimen extraction into laparoscopic anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a consecutive series of 179 patients. Surg Endosc 27(1):127–132CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SurgerySlagelse HospitalSlagelseDenmark

Personalised recommendations