The impact of complications after elective colorectal resection within an enhanced recovery pathway
- 738 Downloads
Despite the implementation of enhanced recovery pathways (ERP), morbidity following colorectal surgery remains high. The aim of the present study was to estimate the impact of postoperative complications on excess hospital length of stay (LOS) in patients undergoing elective colorectal resection.
A retrospective study of patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery at a single institution from 2003 to 2010 was performed. Patients managed by an ERP were compared to conventional care (CC), matched by propensity score radius matching. Complications were defined a priori. Excess (independent effect on LOS from multivariate analysis) and attributable (absolute number of additional bed days) LOS of common postoperative complications determined the impact of complications on bed utilization. Multivariate analysis was performed using multiple linear regression.
A total of 810 propensity-score-matched patients were included (ERP = 472, CC = 338). Complications were significantly lower in the ERP group compared to the CC group (20 vs. 31%, p < 0.001). Median LOS decreased from 7 days in the CC group to 5 days in the ERP group [adjusted decrease in mean LOS of 2.8 days (95% CI 0.8, 4.8)]. Anastomotic leak, myocardial infarction and C. difficile infection had the highest excess LOS for both the ERP and CC groups. However, impaired gastrointestinal function had a higher impact on the absolute number of hospital bed days in the ERP group, as high as anastomotic leak (72.7 vs. 73.5 days respectively), while in the CC group the impact of gastrointestinal dysfunction was less of that of anastomotic leak (50.6 vs. 78.9 days respectively).
In the setting of an ERP, postoperative complications have significant impact on total bed utilization. Impaired gastrointestinal function, given its high incidence, accounted for almost the same number of additional hospital bed days as anastomotic leak in the ERP group and is a target for quality improvement.
KeywordsTreatment outcome Epidemiology Enhanced recovery pathway Preoperative care Length of stay Postoperative complications
Salary support for LL was provided by the Fonds de Recherche en Santé—Québec and the McGill Surgeon Scientist program.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
The study protocol was approved by the institutional review board.
For this type of study formal consent is not required.
- 5.Basse L, Hjort Jakobsen D, Billesbolle P, Werner M, Kehlet H (2000) A clinical pathway to accelerate recovery after colonic resection. AnnSurg 232(1):51–57Google Scholar
- 10.Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 17.Pillai P, McEleavy I, Gaughan M et al (2011) A double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial to assess the effect of Doppler optimized intraoperative fluid management on outcome following radical cystectomy. J Urol 186(6):2201–2206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2011.07.093 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 18.Vaughan-Shaw PG, Fecher IC, Harris S, Knight JS (2012) A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of the opioid receptor antagonist alvimopan in reducing hospital length of stay and time to GI recovery in patients enrolled in a standardized accelerated recovery program after abdominal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 55(5):611–620. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0b013e318249fc78 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 26.Vlug MS, Wind J, Hollmann MW et al (2011) Laparoscopy in combination with fast track multimodal management is the best perioperative strategy in patients undergoing colonic surgery: a randomized clinical trial (LAFA-study). Ann Surg 254(6):868–875. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0b013e31821fd1ce CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar