Advertisement

Techniques in Coloproctology

, Volume 20, Issue 12, pp 825–833 | Cite as

Transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization with mucopexy versus open hemorrhoidectomy in the treatment of hemorrhoids: a meta-analysis of randomized control trials

  • L. XuEmail author
  • H. Chen
  • G. Lin
  • Q. Ge
  • H. Qi
  • X. He
Review

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study was to analyse the outcomes of transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization with mucopexy (THDm) versus open hemorrhoidectomy (OH) in the management of hemorrhoids.

Methods

Randomized controlled trials in English were found by searching PubMed, Web of science, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library database. Trials that compared THDm with OH were identified. Data were extracted independently for each study, and a meta-analysis was performed using fixed and random effects models.

Results

Four trials, including 316 patients, met the inclusion criteria. No statistically significant differences were noted in either total complications or postoperative bleeding, incontinence, recurrent prolapse, and urinary retention rate. Operative time was significantly longer for THDm with Doppler guidance than for THDm without Doppler guidance. Patients returned to normal activities faster after THDm than after OH. No statistically significant differences between THDm and OH were noted with regard to recurrence and reoperation rates.

Conclusions

Our meta-analysis shows that THDm and OH are equally effective and can be attempted for the management of hemorrhoids. However, for THDm with Doppler guidance, more instruments and a longer operative time are required. Future large-scale, high-quality, multicenter trials with long-term outcomes are needed to prove these results and determine whether Doppler guidance in THD is truly necessary or not.

Keywords

Hemorrhoids Dearterialization Artery ligation Mucopexy Meta-analysis 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

For this type of study formal consent is not required.

References

  1. 1.
    LaBella GD, Main WP, Hussain LR (2015) Evaluation of transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization: a single surgeon experience. Tech Coloproctol 19:153–157CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chen HL, Woo XB, Cui J, Chen CQ, Peng JS (2014) Ligasure versus stapled hemorrhoidectomy in the treatment of hemorrhoids: a meta-analysis of randomized control trials. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 24:285–289CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Picchio M, Palimento D, Attanasio U, Renda A (2006) Stapled vs open hemorrhoidectomy: long-term outcome of a randomized controlled trial. Int J Colorectal Dis 21:668–669CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Xu L, Chen H, Lin G, Ge Q (2015) Ligasure versus ferguson hemorrhoidectomy in the treatment of hemorrhoids: a meta-analysis of randomized control trials. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 25:106–110CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Maloku H, Gashi Z, Lazovic R, Islami H, Juniku-Shkololli A (2014) Laser hemorrhoidoplasty procedure vs open surgical hemorrhoidectomy: a trial comparing 2 treatments for hemorrhoids of third and fourth degree. Acta Inform Med 22:365–367CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hoyuela C, Carvajal F, Juvany M et al (2016) HAL-RAR (Doppler guided haemorrhoid artery ligation with recto-anal repair) is a safe and effective procedure for haemorrhoids. Results of a prospective study after two-years follow-up. Int J Colorectal Dis 28:39–44Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Morinaga K, Hasuda K, Ikeda T (1995) A novel therapy for internal hemorrhoids: ligation of the hemorrhoidal artery with a newly devised instrument (Moricorn) in conjunction with a Doppler flowmeter. Am J Gastroenterol 90:610–613PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chayama K, Tsubota A, Arase Y et al (1995) Genotype, slow decrease in virus titer during interferon treatment and high degree of sequence variability of hypervariable region are indicative of poor response to interferon treatment in patients with chronic hepatitis type C. J Hepatol 23:648–653CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gravie JF (2014) Hemorrhoidal arterial ligation with mucopexy: a risk-free technique? J Visc Surg 151:421–422CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ratto C, de Parades V (2014) Doppler-guided ligation of hemorrhoidal arteries with mucopexy: a technique for the future. J Visc Surg 152:S15–S21CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jadad AR, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds DJ, Gavaghan DJ, McQuay HJ (1996) Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials 17:1–12CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Elmér SE, Nygren JO, Lenander CE (2013) A randomized trial of transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization with anopexy compared with open hemorrhoidectomy in the treatment of hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum 56:484–490CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    De Nardi P, Capretti G, Corsaro A, Staudacher C (2014) A prospective, randomized trial comparing the short- and long-term results of doppler-guided transanal hemorrhoid dearterialization with mucopexy versus excision hemorrhoidectomy for grade III hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum 57:348–353CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Denoya P, Tam J, Bergamaschi R (2014) Hemorrhoidal dearterialization with mucopexy versus hemorrhoidectomy: 3-year follow-up assessment of a randomized controlled trial. Tech Coloproctol 18:1081–1085CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Elshazly WG, Gazal AE, Madbouly K, Hussen A (2015) Ligation anopexy versus hemorrhoidectomy in the treatment of second- and third-degree hemorrhoids. Tech Coloproctol 19:29–34CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Talha A, Bessa S, Abdel Wahab M (2014) Ligasure, Harmonic Scalpel versus conventional diathermy in excisional haemorrhoidectomy: a randomized controlled trial. ANZ J Surg. doi: 10.1111/ans.12838 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Arnold S, Antonietti E, Rollinger G, Scheyer M (2002) Doppler ultrasound assisted hemorrhoid artery ligation. A new therapy in symptomatic hemorrhoids. Chirurg 73:269–273CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bursics A, Morvay K, Kupcsulik P, Flautner L (2004) Comparison of early and 1-year follow-up results of conventional hemorrhoidectomy and hemorrhoid artery ligation: a randomized study. Int J Colorectal Dis 19:176–180CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Takenoshita S, Hashizume T, Asao T et al (1995) Efficacy of immunochemotherapy with Ftorafur and Krestin in rats. Anticancer Res 15:147–151PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Giordano P, Tomasi I, Pascariello A, Mills E, Elahi S (2014) Transanal dearterialization with targeted mucopexy is effective for advanced haemorrhoids. Colorectal Dis 16:373–376CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ruhm W, Kato K, Korschinek G, Morinaga H, Nolte E (1995) Neutron spectrum and yield of the Hiroshima A-bomb deduced from radionuclide measurements at one location. Int J Radiat Biol 68:97–103CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Yoh M, Morinaga N, Noda M, Honda T (1995) The binding of Vibrio parahaemolyticus 125I-labeled thermostable directhemolysin to erythrocytes. Toxicon 33:651–657CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Fujiwara M, Mizoguchi H, Kawamura J et al (1995) A new endotracheal tube with a cuff impervious to nitrous oxide: constancy of cuff pressure and volume. Anesth Analg 81:1084–1086PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Nomori H, Horio H, Kobayashi R, Morinaga S, Hirabayashi Y (1995) Protein 1 (Clara cell protein) serum levels in lung cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. Eur Respir J 8:1654–1657CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Giamundo P, Cecchetti W, Esercizio L et al (2011) Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal laser procedure for the treatment of symptomatic hemorrhoids: experimental background and short-term clinical results of a new mini-invasive treatment. Surg Endosc 25:1369–1375CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Faucheron JL, Poncet G, Voirin D, Badic B, Gangner Y (2011) Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation and rectoanal repair (HAL-RAR) for the treatment of grade IV hemorrhoids: long-term results in 100 consecutive patients. Dis Colon Rectum 54:226–231CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Giordano P, Nastro P, Davies A, Gravante G (2011) Prospective evaluation of stapled haemorrhoidopexy versus transanal haemorrhoidal dearterialisation for stage II and III haemorrhoids: three-year outcomes. Tech Coloproctol 15:67–73CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lopez-Delgado A, Arroyo A, Ruiz-Tovar J et al (2014) Effect on anal pressure of percutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence. Colorectal Dis 16:533–537CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Morinaga T, Fujii S, Kikumori M, Nishimori T, Watanabe M, Sumi N (1995) Reproductive and developmental toxicity studies of montirelin hydrate (4) Perinatal and postnatal study in rats by intravenous administration. J Toxicol Sci 20((Suppl 2)):309–323CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Coloproctology, First Affiliated Hospital of ZhejiangChinese Medical UniversityHangzhouPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Department of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Sixth Affiliated HospitalSun Yat-Sen UniversityGuangzhouPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations