Influence of body posture on defecation: a prospective study of “The Thinker” position
- 1.5k Downloads
We hypothesized that bending the upper body into what we have termed “The Thinker” position facilitates defecation. This study aimed to assess the influence of “The Thinker” position on defecation.
This is the prospective single-group study. Patients who could not evacuate the paste in normal sitting position on cinedefecography between January and June 2013 were enrolled in this study. Cinedefecography was first performed in the sitting position; if the patient was unable to evacuate the paste, images were obtained in “The Thinker” position. Patients who were able to evacuate the paste were excluded from the study. Anorectal angle (ARA), perineal plane distance (PPD), and puborectalis length (PRL) during straining in both positions were measured from the radiographs.
Twenty-two patients unable to evacuate the barium paste underwent cinedefecography in “The Thinker” position. Seventeen patients were female, average age of 56 (range 22–76) years. “The Thinker” position had significantly wider ARA than the sitting position (113° vs. 134°, respectively; p = 0.03), larger PPD (7.1 vs. 9.3 cm, respectively; p = 0.02), and longer PRL (12.9 vs. 15.2 cm, respectively; p = 0.005) during straining. Eleven patients could evacuate completely in “The Thinker” position.
“The Thinker” position seems to be a more efficient method for defecation than the sitting position. This technique may be helpful when retraining patients with constipation.
KeywordsDefecation posture Defecography Anorectal angle Constipation Fecal outlet obstruction
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 2.Rad S (2002) Impact of ethnic habit on defecographic measurements. Arch Iran Med 5:115–117Google Scholar
- 3.Tsuchino M, Yamashita K, Boda T et al (2008) A study of the relationship between continence function and defecatory posture. J Jpn Soc Stoma Cont Rehabil 24:34–38Google Scholar
- 10.Haubruch W (1985) Constipation. In: Berk J (ed) Bockus gastroenterology, 4th edn, Saunders, Philadelphia, p 111Google Scholar
- 12.Singer C (1958) History of technology. The industrial revolution, Oxford, pp 507–508Google Scholar
- 17.Parks A (1975) Anorectal incontinence. Proc R Soc Med 68:21–30Google Scholar
- 19.Preston D (1983) Neuropathology of stow-transit constipation. Gut 24:997AGoogle Scholar
- 20.Swash M (1988) Pelvic floor outlet and sphincter disorders. Ital J Gastroenterol 20:344–347Google Scholar