Advertisement

Techniques in Coloproctology

, Volume 19, Issue 5, pp 275–280 | Cite as

Surgical stress response after colorectal resection: a comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and open surgery

  • J. ShibataEmail author
  • S. Ishihara
  • N. Tada
  • K. Kawai
  • N. H. Tsuno
  • H. Yamaguchi
  • E. Sunami
  • J. Kitayama
  • T. Watanabe
Original Article

Abstract

Background

The perioperative immune status of colorectal robotic surgery (RS), laparoscopic surgery (LS), and open surgery (OS) patients has not been compared. Our aim was to evaluate perioperative stress and immune response after RS, LS and OS.

Methods

This prospective study included 46 colorectal surgery patients from the Department of Surgical Oncology of the University of Tokyo Hospital. Peripheral venous blood samples were obtained preoperatively and on postoperative days 1, 3, and 6. We evaluated expression of HLA-DR (marker of immune competence), C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, and lymphocyte subset counts (natural killers, cytotoxic T cells and helper T cells).

Results

Fifteen, 23, and 8 patients underwent RS, LS and OS, respectively. HLA-DR expression was the lowest on day 1 and gradually increased on days 3 and 6 in all the groups. There was no significant difference in postoperative HLA-DR expression between the RS and LS group. However, on day 3, HLA-DR expression in the RS group was significantly higher than in the OS group (p = 0.04). On day 1, CRP levels in the LS group were significantly lower than in the RS group (p = 0.038). There were no significant perioperative changes in the lymphocyte subset cell count between the three groups.

Conclusions

Perioperative surgical stress, as evaluated by immunological parameters, was comparable between robotic and laparoscopic surgery and higher with open surgery. Robotic surgery may be an alternative to laparoscopic surgery, as a minimally invasive surgery option for colorectal cancer.

Keywords

Robotic surgery Laparoscopic surgery Colorectal resection HLA-DR Lymphocyte subsets 

Notes

Conflict of interest

None.

References

  1. 1.
    Group COoSTS (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 13:2050–2059Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Biondi A, Grosso G, Mistretta A et al (2013) Laparoscopic vs. open approach for colorectal cancer: evolution over time of minimal invasive surgery. BMC Surg 13(Suppl 2):S12CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Veldkamp R, Gholghesaei M, Bonjer HJ et al (2004) Laparoscopic resection of colon cancer: consensus of the European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES). Surg Endosc 18:1163–1185CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    van der Pas MH, Haglind E, Cuesta MA et al (2013) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 14:210–218CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jayne DG, Guillou PJ, Thorpe H et al (2007) Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group. J Clin Oncol 25:3061–3068CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jayne DG, Thorpe HC, Copeland J, Quirke P, Brown JM, Guillou PJ (2010) Five-year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 97:1638–1645CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fleshman J, Sargent DJ, Green E et al (2007) Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial. Ann Surg 246:655–662 discussion 662–654CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Braga M, Vignali A, Zuliani W et al (2002) Metabolic and functional results after laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a randomized, controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum 45:1070–1077CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Han SA, Lee WY, Park CM, Yun SH, Chun HK (2010) Comparison of immunologic outcomes of laparoscopic vs open approaches in clinical stage III colorectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 25:631–638CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Veenhof AA, Sietses C, von Blomberg BM et al (2011) The surgical stress response and postoperative immune function after laparoscopic or conventional total mesorectal excision in rectal cancer: a randomized trial. Int J Colorectal Dis 26:53–59CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Karanika S, Karantanos T, Theodoropoulos GE (2013) Immune response after laparoscopic colectomy for cancer: a review. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) 1:85–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pigazzi A, Ellenhorn JD, Ballantyne GH, Paz IB (2006) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 20:1521–1525CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Peterson CY, Weiser MR (2014) Robotic colorectal surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 18:398–403CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Keller DS, Senagore AJ, Lawrence JK, Champagne BJ, Delaney CP (2013) Comparative effectiveness of laparoscopic versus robot-assisted colorectal resection. Surg Endosc 28:212–221CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Saklani AP, Lim DR, Hur H et al (2013) Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for mid-low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy: comparison of oncologic outcomes. Int J Colorectal Dis 28:1689–1698CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Salman M, Bell T, Martin J, Bhuva K, Grim R, Ahuja V (2013) Use, cost, complications, and mortality of robotic versus nonrobotic general surgery procedures based on a nationwide database. Am Surg 79:553–560PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kerr SF, Klonizakis M, Glynne-Jones R (2010) Suppression of the postoperative neutrophil leucocytosis following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer and implications for surgical morbidity. Colorectal Dis 12:549–554CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wichmann MW, Meyer G, Adam M et al (2003) Detrimental immunologic effects of preoperative chemoradiotherapy in advanced rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 46:875–887CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hartley A, Giridharan S, Srihari N, McConkey C, Geh JI (2003) Impaired postoperative neutrophil leucocytosis and acute complications following short course preoperative radiotherapy for operable rectal cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 29:155–157CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kawai K, Tsuno NH, Kitayama J et al (2003) Epigallocatechian gallate, the main component of tea polyphenol, binds to CD4 and interferes with gp120 binding. J Allergy Clin Immunol 112:951–957CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Halabi WJ, Kang CY, Jafari MD et al (2013) Robotic-assisted colorectal surgery in the United States: a nationwide analysis of trends and outcomes. World J Surg 37:2782–2790CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Scarpinata R, Aly EH (2013) Does robotic rectal cancer surgery offer improved early postoperative outcomes? Dis Colon Rectum 56:253–262CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hyun MH, Lee CH, Kwon YJ et al (2013) Robot versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for cancer by an experienced surgeon: comparisons of surgery, complications, and surgical stress. Ann Surg Oncol 20:1258–1265CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Park JY, Jo MJ, Nam BH et al (2012) Surgical stress after robot-assisted distal gastrectomy and its economic implications. Br J Surg 99:1554–1561CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kawasaki T, Ogata M, Kawasaki C, Tomihisa T, Okamoto K, Shigematsu A (2001) Surgical stress induces endotoxin hyporesponsiveness and an early decrease of monocyte mCD14 and HLA-DR expression during surgery. Anesth Analg 92:1322–1326CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Flohe S, Lendemans S, Schade FU, Kreuzfelder E, Waydhas C (2004) Influence of surgical intervention in the immune response of severely injured patients. Intensive Care Med 30:96–102CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mokart D, Textoris J, Chow-Chine L et al (2011) HLA-DR and B7-2 (CD86) monocyte expressions after major cancer surgery: profile in sepsis. Minerva Anestesiol 77:522–527PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kono K, Sekikawa T, Matsumoto Y (1995) Influence of surgical stress on monocytes and complications of infection in patients with esophageal cancer–monocyte HLA-DR antigen expression and respiratory burst capacity. J Surg Res 58:275–280CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Veenhof AA, Vlug MS, van der Pas MH et al (2012) Surgical stress response and postoperative immune function after laparoscopy or open surgery with fast track or standard perioperative care: a randomized trial. Ann Surg 255:216–221CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Tsimogiannis KE, Tellis CC, Tselepis AD, Pappas-Gogos GK, Tsimoyiannis EC, Basdanis G (2012) Toll-like receptors in the inflammatory response during open and laparoscopic colectomy for colorectal cancer. Surg Endosc 26:330–336CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Baumgartner JM, Silliman CC, Moore EE, Banerjee A, McCarter MD (2009) Stored red blood cell transfusion induces regulatory T cells. J Am Coll Surg 208:110–119CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Tyler JA, Fox JP, Desai MM, Perry WB, Glasgow SC (2013) Outcomes and costs associated with robotic colectomy in the minimally invasive era. Dis Colon Rectum 56:458–466CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Park EJ, Cho MS, Baek SJ et al (2014) Long-term oncologic outcomes of robotic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a comparative study with laparoscopic surgery. Ann Surg. doi: 10.1097/sla.0000000000000613 Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kim CW, Kim CH, Baik SH (2014) Outcomes of robotic-assisted colorectal surgery compared with laparoscopic and open surgery: a systematic review. J Gastrointest Surg 18:816–830CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia Srl 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Shibata
    • 1
    Email author
  • S. Ishihara
    • 1
  • N. Tada
    • 1
  • K. Kawai
    • 1
  • N. H. Tsuno
    • 2
  • H. Yamaguchi
    • 1
  • E. Sunami
    • 1
  • J. Kitayama
    • 1
  • T. Watanabe
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Surgical Oncology, Faculty of MedicineThe University of TokyoTokyoJapan
  2. 2.Department of Transfusion Medicine, Faculty of MedicineThe University of TokyoTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations