Techniques in Coloproctology

, Volume 18, Issue 10, pp 937–943 | Cite as

Circumferential resection margins of rectal tumours post-radiotherapy: how can MRI aid surgical planning?

  • E. R. McGlone
  • V. Shah
  • C. Lowdell
  • D. Blunt
  • P. Cohen
  • P. M. Dawson
Original Article
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

Background

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is known to have high predictive accuracy for circumferential resection margin (CRM) involvement of pre-treatment rectal tumours. This study aims to assess predictive accuracy of MRI for CRM involvement in rectal cancers post-long-course chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and in particular to understand how this information can influence surgical planning.

Methods

Forty-seven rectal cancers treated with CRT followed by bowel resection in one hospital since 2005 were reviewed for clinical, radiological and pathological characteristics. Using a validated pro forma, a radiologist blinded to final histology and original MRI report predicted CRM status from post-CRT MRI images. Results were compared to histological CRM status of final specimen, and differential analysis by type of surgical operation was performed.

Results

Overall accuracy of MRI for CRM involvement post-CRT was 72 % with a negative predictive value of 92 %. Abdominoperineal excision (APE) post-CRT was associated with non-significantly higher rates of histologically involved CRM than anterior resection (AR; 41 vs. 21 %) as were mucinous adenocarcinomas when compared to non-mucinous (56 vs. 21 %). Overall accuracy and positive predictive value were non-significantly higher for cancer treated with a standard APE than AR, and negative predictive value was high for both groups.

Conclusions

MRI post-CRT has high negative predictive value for CRM status. Such information is of particular clinical relevance in low rectal cancers treated with APE as it can indicate when a standard surgical approach is likely to be sufficient.

Keywords

MRI CRM Advanced rectal cancer Neoadjuvant radiotherapy Surgical planning 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgments

Dr. Gina Brown, consultant radiologist, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, for use of pro forma [13] and support and guidance.

Conflict of interest

None.

References

  1. 1.
    Kim NK, Kim YW, Min BS, Lee KY, Sohn SK, Cho CH (2009) Factors associated with local recurrence after neoadjuvant chemoradiation with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. World J Surg 33:1741–1749PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nagtegaal ID, Quirke P (2008) What is the role for the circumferential margin in the modern treatment of rectal cancer? J Clin Oncol 26:303–312PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gosens MJ, Klaassen RA, Tan-Go I et al (2007) Circumferential margin involvement is the crucial prognostic factor after multimodality treatment in patients with locally advanced rectal carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 13:6617–6623PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bellows CF, Jaffe B, Bacigalupo L, Pucciarelli S, Gagliardi G (2011) Clinical significance of magnetic resonance imaging findings in rectal cancer. World J Radiol 3:92–104PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mercury Study Group (2006) Diagnostic accuracy of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in predicting curative resection of rectal cancer: prospective observational study. BMJ 333:779CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sebag-Montefiore D, Bujko K, Valentini V (2009) Rectal cancer multidisciplinary management: evidences and future landscape. Radiother Oncol 92:145–147PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sebag-Montefiore D, Stephens RJ, Steele R et al (2009) Preoperative radiotherapy versus selective postoperative chemoradiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer (MRC CR07 and NCIC-CTG C016): a multicentre, randomised trial. Lancet 373:811–820PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sauer R, Becker H, Hohenberger W et al (2004) Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 351:1731–1740PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Heald RJ (1988) The ‘Holy Plane’ of rectal surgery. J R Soc Med 81:503–508PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Martijnse IS, Dudink RL, West NP et al (2012) Focus on extralevator perineal dissection in supine position for low rectal cancer has led to better quality of surgery and oncologic outcome. Ann Surg Oncol 19:786–793PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Williams GT, Quirke P, Shepherd NA (2007) Dataset for colorectal cancer (2nd edition) [Online] UK, The Royal College of Pathologists. http://www.rcpath.org/publications-media/publications/datasets/colorectal-cancer
  12. 12.
    Trakarnsanga A, Gonen M, Shia J et al (2013) What is the significance of the circumferential margin in locally advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy? Ann Surg Oncol 20:1179–1184PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Low Rectal Cancer Development Programme (2010) MRI Pro-Forma [page 2]. http://www.lorec.nhs.uk/resources/87177-40779455625.pdf. Accessed 2 July 2014
  14. 14.
    Patel UB, Blomqvist LK, Taylor F et al (2012) MRI after treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer: how to report tumor response—the MERCURY experience. AJR Am J Roentgenol 199:W486–W495PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Eriksen MT, Wibe A, Hestvik UE, Haffner J, Wiig JN (2006) Surgical treatment of primary locally advanced rectal cancer in Norway. Eur J Surg Oncol 32:174–180PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Larsen SG, Wiig JN, Dueland S, Giercksky KE (2008) Prognostic factors after preoperative irradiation and surgery for locally advanced rectal cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 34:410–417PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pomerri F, Pucciarelli S, Maretto I et al (2011) Prospective assessment of imaging after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. Surgery 149:56–64PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kim SH, Lee JM, Park HS, Eun HW, Han JK, Choi BI (2009) Accuracy of MRI for predicting the circumferential resection margin, mesorectal fascia invasion, and tumor response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer. J Magn Reson Imaging 29:1093–1101PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kulkarni T, Gollins S, Maw A, Hobson P, Byrne R, Widdowson D (2008) Magnetic resonance imaging in rectal cancer downstaged using neoadjuvant chemoradiation: accuracy of prediction of tumour stage and circumferential resection margin status. Colorectal Dis 10:479–489PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Vliegen RF, Beets GL, Lammering G et al (2008) Mesorectal fascia invasion after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: accuracy of MR imaging for prediction. Radiology 246:454–462PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Oberholzer K, Junginger T, Heintz A et al (2012) Rectal cancer: MR imaging of the mesorectal fascia and effect of chemoradiation on assessment of tumor involvement. J Magn Reson Imaging 36:658–663PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Allen SD, Padhani AR, Dzik-Jurasz AS, Glynne-Jones R (2007) Rectal carcinoma: MRI with histologic correlation before and after chemoradiation therapy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188:442–451PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Peschaud F, Cuenod CA, Benoist S et al (2005) Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in rectal cancer depends on location of the tumor. Dis Colon Rectum 48:1603–1609PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Patel UB, Taylor F, Blomqvist L et al (2011) Magnetic resonance imaging-detected tumor response for locally advanced rectal cancer predicts survival outcomes: MERCURY experience. J Clin Oncol 29:3753–3760PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Oberholzer K, Menig M, Kreft A et al (2011) Rectal cancer: mucinous carcinoma on magnetic resonance imaging indicates poor response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 82:842–848PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Shin US, Yu CS, Kim JH et al (2011) Mucinous rectal cancer: effectiveness of preoperative chemoradiotherapy and prognosis. Ann Surg Oncol 18:2232–2239PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kim MJ, Park JS, Park SI et al (2003) Accuracy in differentiation of mucinous and nonmucinous rectal carcinoma on MR imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 27:48–55PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tilney HS, Tekkis PP, Sains PS, Constantinides VA, Heriot AG (2007) Factors affecting circumferential resection margin involvement after rectal cancer excision. Dis Colon Rectum 50:29–36PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Quirke P, Steele R, Monson J et al (2009) Effect of the plane of surgery achieved on local recurrence in patients with operable rectal cancer: a prospective study using data from the MRC CR07 and NCIC-CTG CO16 randomised clinical trial. Lancet 373:821–828PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Law WL, Chu KW (2004) Abdominoperineal resection is associated with poor oncological outcome. Br J Surg 91:1493–1499PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Marr R, Birbeck K, Garvican J et al (2005) The modern abdominoperineal excision: the next challenge after total mesorectal excision. Ann Surg 242:74–82PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Mauvais F, Sabbagh C, Brehant O et al (2011) The current abdominoperineal resection: oncological problems and surgical modifications for low rectal cancer. J Visc Surg 148:e85–e93PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Glimelius B, Beets-Tan R, Blomqvist L et al (2011) Mesorectal fascia instead of circumferential resection margin in preoperative staging of rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 29:2142–2143PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    West NP, Finan PJ, Anderin C, Lindholm J, Holm T, Quirke P (2008) Evidence of the oncologic superiority of cylindrical abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 26:3517–3522PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Shihab OC, Heald RJ, Rullier E et al (2009) Defining the surgical planes on MRI improves surgery for cancer of the low rectum. Lancet Oncol 10:1207–1211PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Dent OF, Haboubi N, Chapuis PH et al (2007) Assessing the evidence for an association between circumferential tumour clearance and local recurrence after resection of rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 9:112–121; discussion 121–122Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia Srl 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. R. McGlone
    • 1
  • V. Shah
    • 2
  • C. Lowdell
    • 3
  • D. Blunt
    • 2
  • P. Cohen
    • 4
  • P. M. Dawson
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of SurgerySt George’s Healthcare NHS TrustLondonUK
  2. 2.Department of RadiologyUniversity Hospitals of Leicester NHS TrustLondonUK
  3. 3.Department of Cancer Services, Charing Cross HospitalImperial College Healthcare NHS TrustLondonUK
  4. 4.Department of Histopathology, Charing Cross HospitalImperial College Healthcare NHS TrustLondonUK
  5. 5.Department of Surgery, Charing Cross HospitalImperial College Healthcare NHS TrustLondonUK

Personalised recommendations