Advertisement

Techniques in Coloproctology

, Volume 18, Issue 10, pp 915–919 | Cite as

The role of loose seton in the management of anal fistula: a multicenter study of 200 patients

  • M. E. Kelly
  • H. M. Heneghan
  • F. D. McDermott
  • G. J. Nason
  • C. Freeman
  • S. T. Martin
  • D. C. Winter
Original Article

Abstract

Background

Perianal abscesses and fistulae-in-ano are a common anorectal complaint causing significant distress to patients, and present a considerable treatment challenge. Principal of treatment is achieving closure of the fistula while maintaining continence. There are numerous treatment approaches with large debate about which method is “ideal.” Our aim was to assess the tolerance and efficacy of loose seton placement in the treatment for fistula-in-ano.

Methods

We performed a retrospective multicenter review of the management of anal fistulae with loose seton placement over a three-year period. All patients underwent a standardized procedure, and were rescheduled for an elective change of seton until fistula resolution. Patients’ demographics, medical history, comorbidities, overall number and time interval between seton placements, tolerance, and morbidity of the procedure were recorded.

Results

A total of 200 consecutive patients had loose seton placement. 69.5 % (n = 139) were males, and mean age was 42.6 years. The median number of setons required for each patient was 3 (range 1–8; mean 2.84). The mean interval between changes was 3.08 months (range 2–4 months). All patients had successful clearance of fistula. The procedure was well tolerated in 96 % of patients (n = 187). Only 1 % (n = 2) could not tolerate the presence of seton due to significant discomfort. Fistula recurrence rate was 6 % (n = 12).

Conclusions

Recently, newer treatment modalities have been reported with enthusiasm. However, there remains a lack of strong statistical evidence of efficacy to support their use. Overall, loose seton placement remains a well-tolerated, pragmatic low-cost solution to this common and difficult condition as evident by our study.

Keywords

Rectal fistula Anal fistula Anal gland Surgical technique 

Notes

Conflict of interest

None.

References

  1. 1.
    Malik AI, Nelson RL (2008) Surgical management of anal fistulae: a systematic review. Colorectal Dis 10:420–430PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nelson RL (2002) Anorectal abscess fistula: what do we know. Surg Clin North Am 82:1139–1151PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zanotti C, Martinez-Puente C, Pascual I, Pascual M, Hereros D, Garcia-Olmo D (2007) An assessment of the incidence of fistula-in-ano in four countries of the European Union. Int J Colorectal Dis 22:1459–1462PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Subhas G, Bhullar JS, Al-Omari A, Unawane A, Mittal VK, Pearlman R (2012) Setons in the treatment of anal fistula: review of variations in materials and techniques. Dig Surg 29:292–300PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mitalas LE, van Wijk JJ, Gosselink MP, Doornebosch P, Zimmerman DE, Schouten WR (2010) Seton drainage prior to transanal advancement flap repair: useful or not? Int J Colorectal Dis 25:1499–1502PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hermann G, Defosses L (1880) Sur la muquese de la region cloacale du rectum. Comptes End Acad Des Sci 90:1301–1302Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lockhart-Mummery JP (1929) Discussion on fistula-in-ano. Proc R Soc Med 22:1331Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gordon-Watson C, Dodd H (1935) Observation on fistula in ano in relation to perianal intramuscular glands with report of three cases. Br J Surg 22:703–709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Eisenhammer S (1956) The internal anal sphincter and the anorectal abscess. Surg Gynecol Obstet 103:501–506PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sileri P, Cadeddu F, D’Ugo S et al (2011) Surgery for fistula-in-ano in a specialist colorectal unit: a critical appraisal. BMC Gastroenterol 11:120PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Parks AG, Gordon PH, Hardcastle JD (1976) A classification of fistula-in-ano. Br J Surg 63:1–12PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Williams JG, Farrands PA, Williams AB et al (2007) The treatment of anal fistula: aCPGBI position statement. Colorectal Dis 9:18–50PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dudukgian H, Abcarian H (2011) Why do we have so much trouble treating anal fistula. World J Gastroenterol 17:3292–3296PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    George Pinedo M, Gino Caselli M, Gonzalo Urrejola L et al (2010) Modified loose-seton technique for treatment of complex anal fistula. Colorectal Dis 12:310–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Memon AA, Murtaza G, Azami R, Zafar H, Chawla T, Laghari AA (2011) Treatment of complex fistula in ano with cable-tie seton: a prospective case series. ISRN Surgery 2011:636952PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Garcia Aguillar J, Belmonte C, Wong WD, Goldberg SM, Madof RD (1996) Anal fistula surgery: factors associated with recurrence and incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 39:723–729CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Vasilevsky CA, Gordon PH (1984) The incidence of recurrent abscesses or fistula-in-ano following anorectal suppuration. Dis Colon Rectum 27:126–130PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lim CH, Shin HKS, Kang WH et al (2012) The use of a staged drainage seton for the treatment of anal fistulae or fistulous abscesses. J Korean Soc Coloproctol 28:309–314PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ritchie RD, Sackier JM, Hodde JP (2009) Incontinence rates after cutting seton treatment for anal fistula. Colorectal Dis 11:564–571PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Abcarian H (2011) Anorectal infection: abscess-Fistula. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 24:14–21PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Buchanan G, Owen H, Torkington J, Luniss P, Nicholls RJ, Cohen R (2004) Long-term outcome following loose-seton technique for external sphincter preservation in complex anal fistula. Br J Surg 91:476–480PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lentner A, Wienert C (1996) Long-term indwelling setons for low transsphincteric and intersphincteric anal fistulas. Experience with 108 cases. Dis Colon Rectum 39:1097–1101PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Garcia Olmo D, Vasquez PA, Lopez JF (1994) Multiple seton in treatment of high peri-anal fistula. Br J Surg 81:136–137PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Joy HA, Williams JG (2002) The outcome of surgery for complex anal fistulas. Colorectal Dis 4:254–261PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cirocchi R, Trastulli S, Morelli U et al (2013) The treatment of anal fistulas with biologically derived products: is innovation better than conventional surgical treatment? An update. Tech Coloproctol 17:259–273PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Jurczak F, Laridon JY, Raffaitin P, Redon Y, Pousset JP (2009) Long-term follow-up of the treatment of high anal fistulas using fibrin glue. J Chir 146:1167–1174Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Loungnarath R, Dietz DW, Mutch MG, Birnbaum EH, Kodner IJ, Fleshman JW (2004) Fibrin glue treatment of complex anal fistula has low success rates. Dis Colon Rectum 47:432–436PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Adams T, Yang J, Kondylis PD (2008) Long-term outlook after successful fibrin glue ablation of cryptoglandular transsphincteric fistula-in-ano. Dis Colon Rectum 51:1488–1490PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia Srl 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. E. Kelly
    • 1
  • H. M. Heneghan
    • 1
  • F. D. McDermott
    • 1
  • G. J. Nason
    • 1
  • C. Freeman
    • 1
  • S. T. Martin
    • 1
  • D. C. Winter
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SurgerySt Vincent’s University HospitalDublin 4Ireland

Personalised recommendations