Advertisement

Techniques in Coloproctology

, Volume 17, Issue 3, pp 307–314 | Cite as

Obstructive defecation syndrome: 19 years of experience with laparoscopic resection rectopexy

  • T. Laubert
  • M. Kleemann
  • U. J. Roblick
  • C. Bürk
  • P. Hildebrand
  • J. Lewejohann
  • E. Schlöricke
  • H.-P. Bruch
Original Article

Abstract

Background

In obstructive defecation syndrome (ODS) combinations of morphologic alterations of the pelvic floor and the colorectum are nearly always evident. Laparoscopic resection rectopexy (LRR) aims at restoring physiological function. We present the results of 19 years of experience with this procedure in patients with ODS.

Methods

Between 1993 and 2012, 264 patients underwent LRR for ODS at our department. Perioperative and follow-up data were analyzed.

Results

The female/male ratio was 25.4:1, mean age was 61.3 years (±14.3 years), and mean body mass index (BMI) was 25.2 kg/m2 (±4.2 kg/m2). The pathological conditions most frequently found in combination were a sigmoidocele plus a rectocele (n = 79) and a sigmoidocele plus a rectal prolapse or intussusception (n = 69). The conversion rate was 2.3 % (n = 6). The mortality rate was 0.75 % (n = 2), the rate of complications requiring surgical re-intervention was 4.3 % (n = 11), and the rate of minor complications was 19.8 % (n = 51). Follow-up data were available for 161 patients with a mean follow-up of 58.2 months (±47.1 months). Long-term results showed that 79.5 % of patients (n = 128) reported at least an improvement of symptoms. In cases of a sigmoidocele (n = 63 available for follow-up) or a rectal prolapse II°/III° (n = 72 available for follow-up), the improvement rates were 79.4 % (n = 50) and 81.9 % (n = 59), respectively.

Conclusions

LRR is a safe and effective procedure. Our perioperative results and long-term functional outcome strengthen the evidence regarding benefits of LRR in patients with an outlet obstruction. However, careful patient selection is essential.

Keywords

Outlet obstruction Laparoscopic resection rectopexy Chronic constipation Long-term outcome Sigmoidocele Rectal prolapse 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Mrs. C. Killaitis is gratefully acknowledged for keeping the database updated and for performing the statistical calculations.

Conflict of interest

None.

References

  1. 1.
    Suares NC, Ford AC (2011) Prevalence of, and risk factors for, chronic idiopathic constipation in the community: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 106:1582–1591PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sonnenberg A, Koch TR (1989) Epidemiology of constipation in the United States. Dis Colon Rectum 32:1–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Longstreth GF, Thompson WG, Chey WD, Houghton LA, Mearin F, Spiller RC (2006) Functional bowel disorders. Gastroenterology 130:1480–1491PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Schiedeck TH, Schwandner O, Scheele J, Farke S, Bruch HP (2005) Rectal prolapse: which surgical option is appropriate? Langenbecks Arch Surg 390:8–14PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ommer A, Rolfs T, Walz MK (2010) Chirurgische Therapieoptionen bie Stuhlentleerungsstörungen. CHAZ 11:393–404Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lehur PA, Stuto A, Fantoli M et al (2008) Outcomes of stapled transanal rectal resection vs. biofeedback for the treatment of outlet obstruction associated with rectal intussusception and rectocele: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum 5:1611–1618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gervaz P, Inan I, Perneger T, Schiffer E, Morel P (2010) A prospective, randomized, single-blind comparison of laparoscopic versus open sigmoid colectomy for diverticulitis. Ann Surg 252:3–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Samaranayake CB, Luo C, Plank AW, Merrie AE, Plank LD, Bissett IP (2010) Systematic review on ventral rectopexy for rectal prolapse and intussusception. Colorectal Dis 12:504–512PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tou S, Brown SR, Malik AI, Nelson RL (2008) Surgery for complete rectal prolapse in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (4):CD001758. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001758.pub2
  10. 10.
    Madiba TE, Baig MK, Wexner SD (2005) Surgical management of rectal prolapse. Arch Surg 140:63–73PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Matzel KE, Heuer S, Zhang W (2008) Rectal prolapse. Abdominal or local approach. Chirurg 79:444–451PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Laubert T, Bader FG, Kleemann M et al. (2012) Outcome analysis of elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic resection rectopexy for rectal prolapse. Int J Colorectal Dis. doi: 10.1007/s00384-011-1395-1
  13. 13.
    Ng SS, Leung KL, Lee JF, Yiu RY, Li JC, Hon SS (2009) Long-term morbidity and oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted anterior resection for upper rectal cancer: ten-year results of a prospective, randomized trial. Dis Colon Rectum 52:558–566PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ashari LH, Lumley JW, Stevenson AR, Stitz RW (2005) Laparoscopically-assisted resection rectopexy for rectal prolapse: ten years’ experience. Dis Colon Rectum 48:982–987PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Johnson E, Stangeland A, Johannessen HO, Carlsen E (2007) Resection rectopexy for external rectal prolapse reduces constipation and anal incontinence. Scand J Surg 96:56–61PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    von Papen M, Ashari LH, Lumley JW, Stevenson AR, Stitz RW (2007) Functional results of laparoscopic resection rectopexy for symptomatic rectal intussusception. Dis Colon Rectum 50:50–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kariv Y, Delaney CP, Casillas S et al (2006) Long-term outcome after laparoscopic and open surgery for rectal prolapse: a case-control study. Surg Endosc 20:35–42PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jorge JM, Yang YK, Wexner SD (1994) Incidence and clinical significance of sigmoidoceles as determined by a new classification system. Dis Colon Rectum 37:1112–1117PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bruch HP, Herold A, Schiedeck T, Schwandner O (1999) Laparoscopic surgery for rectal prolapse and outlet obstruction. Dis Colon Rectum 42:1189–1194PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Laubert T, Kleemann M, Schorcht A et al (2010) Laparoscopic resection rectopexy for rectal prolapse: a single-center study during 16 years. Surg Endosc 24:2401–2406PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Roblick UJ, Bader FG, Jungbluth T, Laubert T, Bruch HP (2011) How to do it-laparoscopic resection rectopexy. Langenbecks Arch Surg 396:851–855PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pescatori M, Spyrou M, Pulvirenti d’Urso A (2006) A prospective evaluation of occult disorders in obstructed defecation using the ‘iceberg diagram’. Colorectal Dis 8:785–789PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bruch H-P, Fischer F, Schiedeck TH, Schwandner O (2004) Defäkationsobstruktion. Chirurg 75:861–870PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Schwandner O, Farke S, Fischer F, Schiedeck TH, Bruch HP (2004) Chirurgische Therapie der Outlet-Obstrudkion bei Sigmoidozelen - Ist die lapaorskopische Operation sicher und komplikationsarm? Coloproctology 26:75–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Thompson JR, Chen AH, Pettit PD, Bridges MD (2002) Incidence of occult rectal prolapse in patients with clinical rectoceles and defecatory dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 187:1494–1499PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Dodi G, Pietroletti R, Milito G, Binda G, Pescatori M (2003) Bleeding, incontinence, pain and constipation after STARR transanal double stapling rectotomy for obstructed defecation. Tech Coloproctol 7:148–153PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Boccasanta P, Venturi M, Stuto A et al (2004) Stapled transanal rectal resection for outlet obstruction: a prospective, multicenter trial. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1285–1296PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Madbouly KM, Abbas KS, Hussein AM (2010) Disappointing long-term outcomes after stapled transanal rectal resection for obstructed defecation. World J Surg 34:2191–2196PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zbar AP, Lienemann A, Fritsch H, Beer-Gabel M, Pescatori M (2003) Rectocele: pathogenesis and surgical management. Int J Colorectal Dis 18:369–384PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Vermeulen J, Lange JF, Sikkenk AC, van der Harst E (2005) Anterolateral rectopexy for correction of rectoceles leads to good anatomical but poor functional results. Tech Coloproctol 9:35–41PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kim M, Reibetanz J, Boenicke L, Germer CT, Jayne D, Isbert C (2012) Quality of life after laparoscopic resection rectopexy. Int J Colorectal Dis 27:489–495PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Orrom WJ, Bartolo DC, Miller R, Mortensen NJ, Roe AM (1991) Rectopexy is an ineffective treatment for obstructed defecation. Dis Colon Rectum 34:41–46PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    D’Hoore A, Vanbeckevoort D, Penninckx F (2008) Clinical, physiological and radiological assessment of rectovaginal septum reinforcement with mesh for complex rectocele. Br J Surg 95:1264–1272PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Oom DM, Gosselink MP, van Wijk JJ, van Dijl VR, Schouten WR (2008) Rectocele repair by anterolateral rectopexy: long-term functional outcome. Colorectal Dis 10:925–930PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Schultz I, Mellgren A, Dolk A, Johansson C, Holmstrom B (2000) Long-term results and functional outcome after Ripstein rectopexy. Dis Colon Rectum 43:35–43PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Marchal F, Bresler L, Ayav A et al (2005) Long-term results of Delorme’s procedure and Orr-Loygue rectopexy to treat complete rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 48:1785–1790PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Portier G, Iovino F, Lazorthes F (2006) Surgery for rectal prolapse: Orr-Loygue ventral rectopexy with limited dissection prevents postoperative-induced constipation without increasing recurrence. Dis Colon Rectum 49:1136–1140PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Gemsenjager E (1996) Internal rectal prolapse: therapy outcome and current status. Schweiz Med Wochenschr German 126:1377–1384Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kellokumpu IH, Vironen J, Scheinin T (2000) Laparoscopic repair of rectal prolapse: a prospective study evaluating surgical outcome and changes in symptoms and bowel function. Surg Endosc 14:634–640PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Tsiaoussis J, Chrysos E, Athanasakis E et al (2005) Rectoanal intussusception: presentation of the disorder and late results of resection rectopexy. Dis Colon Rectum 48:838–844PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Benoist S, Taffinder N, Gould S, Chang A, Darzi A (2001) Functional results two years after laparoscopic rectopexy. Am J Surg 182:168–173PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Vignali A, Di Palo S, Tamburini A, Radaelli G, Orsenigo E, Staudacher C (2005) Laparoscopic vs. open colectomies in octogenarians: a case-matched control study. Dis Colon Rectum 48:2070–2075PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. Laubert
    • 1
  • M. Kleemann
    • 1
  • U. J. Roblick
    • 1
  • C. Bürk
    • 1
  • P. Hildebrand
    • 1
  • J. Lewejohann
    • 1
  • E. Schlöricke
    • 1
  • H.-P. Bruch
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryUniversity Hospital Schleswig–Holstein Campus LübeckLübeckGermany

Personalised recommendations