Advertisement

Techniques in Coloproctology

, Volume 16, Issue 1, pp 61–65 | Cite as

Five-year follow-up of Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation

  • S. Avital
  • R. Inbar
  • E. Karin
  • R. Greenberg
Original Article

Abstract

Background

Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation (DGHAL) was described as lower risk and a less painful alternative to hemorrhoidectomy. We report our experience and 5-year follow-up with this procedure.

Methods

Between May 2003 and December 2004, 100 patients with symptomatic Grade II or III hemorrhoids underwent ultrasound identification and ligation of 6–8 terminal branches of the superior rectal artery above the dentate line by a single surgeon using local, regional, or general anesthesia. There were 42 men and 58 women (mean age 42 years, median duration of symptoms 6/3 years). A 10-point visual analog scale was used for postoperative pain scoring. Surgical and functional outcome was assessed at 6 weeks and 3 and 12 months after surgery, with long-term follow-up by a telephone questionnaire at 5 years after the procedure.

Results

The mean operative time was 19 min. Local anal block combined with intravenous sedation (n = 93) or general or spinal (n = 7) anesthesia was used. Only 5 patients were hospitalized overnight. There was no urinary retention, bleeding, or mortality in the immediate postoperative period. The mean pain score decreased from 2.1 at 2 h postoperatively to 1.3 on the first postoperative day. All patients had complete functional recovery by the third postoperative day. Ninety-six patients completed 12 months of follow-up. Eighty-five of these patients (89%) remained asymptomatic at 12 months, though this number dropped to 67/92 (73%) at 5 years.

Conclusions

Long-term follow-up confirms the effectiveness of the DGHAL procedure for treatment for Grade II hemorrhoids. The DGHAL procedure alone seems less effective for Grade III hemorrhoids.

Keywords

Hemorrhoids Doppler Artery Ligation Follow-up 

Notes

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that no conflict of interest exists.

References

  1. 1.
    Greenberg R, Karin E, Avital S, Skornick Y, Werbin N (2006) First 100 cases with doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation. Dis Colon Rectum 49:485–489PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wałega P, Scheyer M, Kenig J et al (2008) Two-center experience in the treatment of hemorrhoidal disease using Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation: functional results after 1-year follow-up. Surg Endosc 22:2379–2383PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Scheyer M, Antonietti E, Rollinger G, Mall H, Arnold S (2006) Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation. Am J Surg 191:89–91PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Giordano P, Overton J, Madeddu F, Zaman S, Gravante G (2009) Transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization: a systematic review. Dis Colon Rectum 52:1665–1671PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dal Monte PP, Tagariello C, Sarago M et al (2007) Transanal haemorrhoidal dearterialisation: nonexcisional surgery for the treatment of haemorrhoidal disease. Tech Coloproctol 11:333–338PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Giordano P, Nastro P, Davies A, Gravante G (2011) Prospective evaluation of stapled haemorrhoidopexy versus transanal haemorrhoidal dearterialisation for stage II and III haemorrhoids: three-year outcomes. Tech Coloproctol 15:67–73PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Avital S, Itah R, Skornick Y, Greenberg R (2011) Outcome of stapled hemorrhoidopexy versus doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation for Grade III hemorrhoids. Tech Coloproctol 15:267–271PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pol RA, van der Zwet WC, Hoornenborg D et al (2010) Results of 244 consecutive patients with hemorrhoids treated with doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation. Dig Surg 27:279–284PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ratto C, Giordano P, Donisi L, Parello A, Litta F, Doglietto GB (2011) Transanal haemorrhoidal dearterialization (THD) for selected fourth-degree haemorrhoids. Tech Coloproctol 15:191–197PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wilkerson PM, Strbac M, Reece-Smith H, Middleton SB (2008) Doppler-guided haemorrhoidal artery ligation: long-term outcome and patient satisfaction. Colorectal Dis 11:394–400PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Giordano P (2011) Outcome of stapled haemorrhoidopexy versus doppler-guided haemorrhoidal artery ligation for grade III haemorrhoids. Tech Coloproctol 15:257–258PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Aigner F, Bodner G, Conrad F, Mbaka G, Kreczy A, Fritsch H (2004) The superior rectal artery and its branching pattern with regard to its clinical influence on ligation techniques for internal hemorrhoids. Am J Surg 187:102–108PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Aigner F, Bodner G, Gruber H et al (2006) The vascular nature of hemorrhoids. J Gastrointest Surg 10:1044–1050PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Aigner F, Bonatti H, Peer S et al (2008) Vascular considerations for stapled haemorrhoidopexy. Colorectal Dis 12:452–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Faucheron JL, Poncet G, Voirin D, Badic B, Ganger Y (2011) Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation and rectoanal repair (HAL-RAR) for the treatment of Grade IV hemorrhoids: long-term results in 100 consecutive patients. Dis Colon Rectum 54:226–231PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Infantino A, Bellomo R, Dal Monte PP et al (2009) Transanal haemorrhoidal artery echodoppler ligation and anopexy (THD) is effective for II and III degree haemorrhoids: a prospective multicentric study. Colorectal Dis 12:804–809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Karin E, Avital S, Dotan I, Skornick Y, Greenberg R (2012) Doppler guided haemorrhoidal artery ligation in patients with Crohn’s disease. Colorectal Dis 14:111–114Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Surgery ‘A’, Tel Aviv Medical Center and the Sackler Faculty of MedicineTel Aviv UniversityTel AvivIsrael

Personalised recommendations