Advertisement

Techniques in Coloproctology

, Volume 13, Issue 2, pp 157–159 | Cite as

Rectal diversion without colostomy in Fournier’s gangrene

  • O. EstradaEmail author
  • I. Martinez
  • M. Del Bas
  • S. Salvans
  • L. A. Hidalgo
Technical Note

Abstract

Fournier’s gangrene is a potentially fatal necrotizing fasciitis affecting the perineum and genital area. The usual treatment includes prompt surgical debridement and, in many cases, a diverting colostomy. We present two cases of Fournier’s gangrene that were treated with extensive local debridement and rectal diversion with a new device for faecal matter management, avoiding the need for a colostomy.

Key words

Rectal diversion Fournier’s gangrene Decompressing tube 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ravo B, Amato A, Bianco V et al (2002) Complications after stapled hemorrhoidectomy: can they be prevented? Tech Coloproctol 6:83–88PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ravo B (2005) Septic complications after stapled hemorrhoidectomy. J Am Coll Surg 201:155–156PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ersay A, Yilmaz G, Akgun Y et al (2007) Factors affecting mortality of Fournier’s gangrene: review of 70 patients. ANZ J Surg 77:43–48PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Norton KS, Johnson LW, Perry T et al (2002) Management of Fournier’s gangrene: an eleven year retrospective analysis of early recognition, diagnosis, and treatment. Am Surg 68:709–713PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pizzorno R, Bonini F, Donelli A et al (1997) Hyperbaric oxygen therapy in the treatment of Fournier’s disease in 11 male patients. J Urol 158:837–840PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Moorthy K, Rao PP, Supe AN (2000) Necrotising perineal infection: a fatal outcome of ischiorectal fossa abscesses. J R Coll Surg Edinb 45:281–284PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Korkut M, Icoz G, Dayangac M et al (2003) Outcome analysis in patients with Fournier’s gangrene: report of 45 cases. Dis Colon Rectum 46:649–652PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bronder CS, Cowey A, Hill J (2004) Delayed stoma formation in Fournier’s gangrene. Colorectal Dis 6:518–520PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Padmanabhan A, Stern M, Wishin J et al (2007) Clinical evaluation of a flexible fecal incontinence management system. Am J Crit Care 16:384–393PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bordes J, Goutorbe P, Asencio Y et al (2008) A non-surgical device for faecal diversion in the management of perineal burns. Burns 34:840–844PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ravo B (1988) The Coloshield. Dis Colon Rectum 31:579–580PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kosorok P (1995) Colostomy tube: new device for continent colostomy. Dis Colon Rectum 38:760–763PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pescatori M (1997) Use of a rubber tube to protect endoanal sutures. Tech Coloproctol 5:32–35Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Knoop M, Vorwerk T (2003) Protection of rectal anastomoses by transanal decompressive tubing. Tech Coloproctol 7:122PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Page BP, Boyce SA, Deans C et al (2008) Significant rectal bleeding as a complication of a fecal collecting device: report of a case. Dis Colon Rectum 51:1427–1429PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • O. Estrada
    • 1
    Email author
  • I. Martinez
    • 1
  • M. Del Bas
    • 1
  • S. Salvans
    • 1
  • L. A. Hidalgo
    • 1
  1. 1.Surgery Hospital de MataróCerretra de Cirera s/n, MataróBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations