Advertisement

International Journal of Clinical Oncology

, Volume 24, Issue 7, pp 857–862 | Cite as

Oncologic and reproductive outcomes of cystectomy as a fertility-sparing treatment for early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer

  • Hiroaki KajiyamaEmail author
  • Shiro Suzuki
  • Kaoru Niimi
  • Satoshi Tamauchi
  • Michiyasu Kawai
  • Tetsuro Nagasaka
  • Kiyosumi Shibata
  • Fumitaka Kikkawa
Original Article
  • 247 Downloads

Abstract

Background

Fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) has mainly been chosen for young women with ovarian-confined/well-differentiated epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). In general, FSS consists of at least conservation of contralateral ovary and the uterus with a staging surgery. However, information on the clinical outcome in women who underwent cystectomy as a fertility-preserving option is lacking.

Methods

After a central pathological review and search of the medical records from multiple institutions between 1987 and 2015, a total of eight early-stage EOC patients treated with cystectomy as FSS were retrospectively evaluated. Diagnosis and staging were based on International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics criteria (2014). Surgery consisted of uni- or bilateral cystectomy. The oncologic and reproductive outcomes were assessed.

Results

The median age was 29 years (range 26–38 years). The median follow-up time was 103.6 months (range 42.2–218.3 months). The stage was IA in 3, IC1 in 4, and IC3 in one patient. Five patients received adjuvant chemotherapy. After cystectomy, two patients experienced recurrence in the pelvic cavity and bilateral ovaries, respectively. The former patient died of the disease 42 months after cystectomy, and conversely, the latter one was rescued by subsequent radical surgery. Four full-term childbirths were observed in three patients.

Conclusions

Although oophorectomy is considered as an appropriate fertility-preserving operation, cystectomy may be an unavoidable option when it is the only surgical procedure available. It is desirable to verify the utility by accumulating larger numbers of patients through a future registry system.

Keywords

Epithelial ovarian carcinoma Fertility-sparing surgery Cystectomy Oncologic outcome Reproductive outcome 

Abbreviations

EOC

Epithelial ovarian carcinoma

FSS

Fertility-sparing surgery

FIGO

International federation of gynecology and obstetrics

Notes

Acknowledgements

We sincerely thank TOTSG members for collaborating in data collection.

Author contributions

Conceptualization: HK; methodology: HK; validation: FK; formal analysis and investigation: HK; writing—original draft preparation: HK; writing—review and editing: HK, KS; resources: MK, KN, SS, ST, TN; supervision: FK.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A, Cancer Statistics (2017) CA Cancer J Clin 67:7–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kikkawa F, Nawa A, Ino K et al (2006) Nomura S Advances in treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer. Nagoya J Med Sci 68:19–26PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    NCCN Guidelines for Patients: Ovarian Cancer www.nccn.org/patients 2017; National Comprehensive Cancer NetworkGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bozas G, Dimopoulos MA, Kastritis E et al (2006) Bamias A Young age is associated with favorable characteristics but is not an independent prognostic factor in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer: a single institution experience. Oncology 70:265–272CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Duska LR, Chang YC, Flynn CE et al (1999) Nikrui N Epithelial ovarian carcinoma in the reproductive age group. Cancer 85:2623–2629CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rodriguez M, Nguyen HN, Averette HE et al (1994) Sevin BU National survey of ovarian carcinoma XII. Epithelial ovarian malignancies in women less than or equal to 25 years of age. Cancer 73:1245–1250CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Smedley H, Sikora K (1985) Age as a prognostic factor in epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 92:839–842CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yoshikawa N, Kajiyama H, Mizuno M et al (2014) Clinicopathologic features of epithelial ovarian carcinoma in younger vs. older patients: analysis in Japanese women. J Gynecol Oncol 25:118–123CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Satoh T, Hatae M, Watanabe Y et al (2010) Outcomes of fertility-sparing surgery for stage I epithelial ovarian cancer: a proposal for patient selection. J Clin Oncol 28:1727–1732CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kajiyama H, Shibata K, Mizuno M et al (2011) Long-term survival of young women receiving fertility-sparing surgery for ovarian cancer in comparison with those undergoing radical surgery. Br J Cancer 105:1288–1294CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Prat J (2014) Oncology FCoG Staging classification for cancer of the ovary, fallopian tube, and peritoneum. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 124:1–5CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rustin GJ, Vergote I, Eisenhauer E et al (2011) Definitions for response and progression in ovarian cancer clinical trials incorporating RECIST 1.1 and CA 125 agreed by the Gynecological Cancer Intergroup (GCIG). Int J Gynecol Cancer 21:419–423CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fruscio R, Corso S, Ceppi L et al (2013) Colombo N Conservative management of early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer: results of a large retrospective series. Ann Oncol 24:138–144CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hess V, A’Hern R, Nasiri N et al (2004) Gore ME Mucinous epithelial ovarian cancer: a separate entity requiring specific treatment. J Clin Oncol 22:1040–1044CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kajiyama H, Shibata K, Mizuno M et al (2011) Kikkawa F Fertility-sparing surgery in young women with mucinous adenocarcinoma of the ovary. Gynecol Oncol 122:334–338CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kurman RJ, Shih Ie M (2010) The origin and pathogenesis of epithelial ovarian cancer: a proposed unifying theory. Am J Surg Pathol 34:433–443CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Trimbos JB, Parmar M, Vergote I et al (2003) International collaborative ovarian neoplasm trial 1 and adjuvant chemotherapy in ovarian neoplasm trial: two parallel randomized phase III trials of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with early-stage ovarian carcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst 95:105–112CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japan Society of Clinical Oncology 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hiroaki Kajiyama
    • 1
    Email author
  • Shiro Suzuki
    • 1
  • Kaoru Niimi
    • 1
  • Satoshi Tamauchi
    • 1
  • Michiyasu Kawai
    • 2
  • Tetsuro Nagasaka
    • 3
  • Kiyosumi Shibata
    • 4
  • Fumitaka Kikkawa
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Graduate School of MedicineNagoya UniversityNagoyaJapan
  2. 2.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyToyohashi Municipal HospitalToyohashiJapan
  3. 3.Division of Medical Laboratory Sciences, School of Health ScienceNagoya UniversityNagoyaJapan
  4. 4.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyBantane Hospital, Fujita Health UniversityNagoyaJapan

Personalised recommendations