Coadministration of cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents with irinotecan is a risk factor for irinotecan-induced cholinergic syndrome in Japanese patients with cancer
Cholinergic syndrome is an acute adverse event frequently observed in patients administered irinotecan, and can sometimes negatively affect their quality of life. In some manifestations of the syndrome such as bradycardia, careful monitoring of patients is advised. In this study, we retrospectively investigated the risk factors associated with irinotecan-induced cholinergic syndrome in Japanese patients with cancer.
Patients who received irinotecan-based chemotherapy between April 2014 and June 2018 were examined. Patient backgrounds and clinical data during the first cycle of an irinotecan-containing regimen, including cholinergic syndrome manifestation within 24 h after the start of treatment, were collected from medical records. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess the risk of irinotecan-induced cholinergic syndrome.
Among 179 patients administered an irinotecan-containing regimen, 51 experienced cholinergic syndrome after the initiation of treatment. The most common symptom was sweating followed by diarrhea, abdominal pain, lacrimation, and nasal discharge. 42 patients developed symptoms of cholinergic syndrome during their first treatment with irinotecan. Multivariate analyses revealed that the incidences of cholinergic syndrome in patients administered 2 or 3 chemotherapeutic agents; i.e., irinotecan plus 1 or 2 other cytotoxic anticancer drug(s), were significantly higher than that in patients administered irinotecan alone [odds ratio (OR) 4.35, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.5–12, p = 0.0053 and OR 4.50, 95% CI 1.5–14, p = 0.0093, respectively]. The addition of a molecularly targeted drug did not affect the incidence of cholinergic syndrome.
The incidence rate of irinotecan-induced cholinergic syndrome increased concomitantly with the addition of cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents administered.
KeywordsAdverse events Chemotherapeutic agents Cholinergic syndrome Irinotecan Risk factors
The authors would like to thank all the staff members of Showa University Hospital who cooperated in this study.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
All authors have no conflict of interest to declare in association with this study.
- 2.Mathijssen RH, van Alphen RJ, Verweij J et al (2001) Clinical pharmacokinetics and metabolism of irinotecan (CPT-11). Clin Cancer Res 7(8):2182–2194Google Scholar
- 3.Ando Y, Saka H, Ando M et al (2000) Polymorphisms of UDP-glucuronosyltransferase gene and irinotecan toxicity: a pharmacogenetic analysis. Cancer Res 60(24):6921–6926Google Scholar
- 11.Pitot HC, Goldberg RM, Reid JM et al (2000) Phase I dose-finding and pharmacokinetic trial of irinotecan hydrochloride (CPT-11) using a once-every-three-week dosing schedule for patients with advanced solid tumor malignancy. Clin Cancer Res 6(6):2236–2244Google Scholar
- 13.Tsavaris N, Ziras N, Kosmas C et al (2003) Two different schedules of irinotecan (CPT-11) in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma relapsing after a 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin combination. A randomized study. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 52(6):514–519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-003-0659-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Sunakawa Y, Fujita K, Ichikawa W et al (2012) A phase I study of infusional 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin and irinotecan in Japanese patients with advanced colorectal cancer who harbor UGT1A1*1/*1,*1/*6 or *1/*28. Oncology 82(4):242–248. https://doi.org/10.1159/000337225 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Peeters M, Price TJ, Cervantes A et al (2010) Randomized phase III study of panitumumab with fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) compared with FOLFIRI alone as second-line treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 28(31):4706–4713. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2009.27.6055 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Yamazaki K, Nagase M, Tamagawa H et al (2016) Randomized phase III study of bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI and bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (WJOG4407G). Ann Oncol 27(8):1539–1546. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdw206 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Van Cutsem E, Tabernero J, Lakomy R et al (2012) Addition of aflibercept to fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan improves survival in a phase III randomized trial in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer previously treated with an oxaliplatin-based regimen. J Clin Oncol 30(28):3499–3506. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2012.42.8201 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Tabernero J, Yoshino T, Cohn AL et al (2015) Ramucirumab versus placebo in combination with second-line FOLFIRI in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma that progressed during or after first-line therapy with bevacizumab, oxaliplatin, and a fluoropyrimidine (RAISE): a randomised, double-blind, multicentre, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol 16(5):499–508. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(15)70127-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Hironaka S, Ueda S, Yasui H et al (2013) Randomized, open-label, phase III study comparing irinotecan with paclitaxel in patients with advanced gastric cancer without severe peritoneal metastasis after failure of prior combination chemotherapy using fluoropyrimidine plus platinum: WJOG 4007 trial. J Clin Oncol 31(35):4438–4444. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2012.48.5805 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.Muro K, Boku N, Shimada Y et al (2010) Irinotecan plus S-1 (IRIS) versus fluorouracil and folinic acid plus irinotecan (FOLFIRI) as second-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomised phase 2/3 non-inferiority study (FIRIS study). Lancet Oncol 11(9):853–860. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70181-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar