Increased risk of certain second primary malignancies in patients treated for well-differentiated thyroid cancer
- 278 Downloads
The objective was to evaluate the incidence of second primary malignancies (SPMs) in thyroid cancer patients compared to age- and gender-matched controls without thyroid cancer from the general population of the same region.
Tampere and Oulu University Hospitals treated 910 patients with well-differentiated thyroid cancer during 1981–2002. The Finnish cancer registry provided follow-up data for patients and controls (n = 4542) for an average of 16 years. The incidence of invasive malignancies per 10 000 person-years was calculated and compared between patients and controls. The follow-up period ended December 31st, 2011.
Young patients <40 years [Rate Ratio (RR) 1.73, p = 0.037] and patients diagnosed since 1996 (RR 1.51, p = 0.029) had an increased incidence of SPMs. Patients had an increased risk of sarcomas and soft tissue tumours (RR 4.37, p = 0.004) and haematological and lymphatic malignancies (RR 1.87, p = 0.035), especially non-Hodgkin lymphomas (RR 2.78, p = 0.035). The overall incidence of SPMs was not statistically higher in patients (109 SPMs/910 patients vs. 500 SPMs/4542 controls, RR 1.12, p = 0.269). Most patients were radioiodine-treated (81 %). The risk of SPMs with low cumulative radioiodine doses was RR 0.94 (≤3.7 GBq, p = 0.650) and with high doses RR 1.37 (>3.7 GBq, p = 0.143). Cumulative radioiodine dose increased during the study period.
The overall incidence of SPMs was not higher in patients than in controls. The incidence of SPMs in thyroid carcinoma patients was higher in patients <40 years old and patients diagnosed since 1996. The incidence of sarcomas and lymphomas was higher in patients than in controls.
KeywordsThyroid cancer Second cancer Radioiodine Cancer incidence
We would like to thank Adjunct Professor Jarkko Isotalo (University of Helsinki) and Ph.D. Maarit Leinonen (the Finnish Cancer Registry) for their contributions. This study was financially supported by Elna Kaarina Savolainen’s fund allocated for the development of cancer treatment and by the research funding of the Pirkanmaa Hospital District.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 1.Elisei R, Molinaro E, Agate L et al (2010) Are the clinical and pathological features of differentiated thyroid carcinoma really changed over the last 35 years? Study on 4187 patients from a single Italian institution to answer this question. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 95:1516–1527CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 7.Cooper DS, Doherty GM, Haugen BR et al (2009) Revised american thyroid association management guidelines for patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer: the American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines taskforce on thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer. Thyroid 19:1167–1214CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 18.Fritz A, Percy C, Jack A, Shanmugaratnam K, Sobin L, Parkin M et al (2000) International Classification of Diseases for Oncology, 3rd Edition (ICD-O-3), vol 2014. WHO, GenevaGoogle Scholar