Efficacy of intraoperative entire-circumferential frozen section analysis of lumpectomy margins during breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer
- 397 Downloads
Intraoperative frozen section analysis of the surgical margins during breast-conserving surgery (BCS) for breast cancer can reliably achieve clear surgical margins and prevent re-operations. The aim of this study was to assess intraoperative entire-circumferential frozen section analysis (IEFSA) of the lumpectomy margins during BCS.
A total of 1029 patients who underwent BCS with IEFSA between June 2007 and July 2013 were available for assessment. The inner surfaces of the shaved lumpectomy margins were examined as frozen sections during BCS. The margins were defined as positive when the cancer cells were present within 5 mm from the edge of the outermost margins of the specimens.
Out of 1029 patients, 312 patients (30.3 %) had positive margins after the initial lumpectomy and underwent additional resections during BCS. Fourteen patients (1.4 %) underwent mastectomy following the results of additional resections during the first surgery. Of 1015 patients who completed BCS, 60 patients (5.9 %) were found to have positive margins in the final pathology. One patient (0.1 %) underwent re-operation after BCS while the residual diseases of the other 59 patients were judged to be minimal. Of the 312 patients who were judged to have positive margins after the initial lumpectomy with IEFSA, 53 patients (16.9 %) were found to have negative margins in the final pathology. At a median follow-up time of 54.1 months, one patient (0.1 %) had a recurrence of breast cancer in the preserved breast.
IEFSA is useful for preventing the need for re-operation and local recurrence after BCS.
KeywordsBreast-conserving surgery Lumpectomy margin Intraoperative entire-circumferential frozen section analysis Re-operation Local recurrence
We would like to thank the staff members of the Department of Clinical Pathology at our hospital for their technical support.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest with respect to this study.
- 23.Jorns JM, Visscher D, Sabel M et al (2012) Intraoperative frozen section analysis of margins in breast conserving surgery significantly decreases reoperative rates: one-year experience at an ambulatory surgical center. Am J Clin Pathol 138(5):657–669. doi: 10.1309/ajcp4iemxcj1gdts PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 25.Houssami N, Macaskill P, Marinovich ML et al (2014) The association of surgical margins and local recurrence in women with early-stage invasive breast cancer treated with breast-conserving therapy: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 21(3):717–730. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-3480-5 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 26.Moran MS, Schnitt SJ, Giuliano AE et al (2014) Society of Surgical Oncology-American Society for Radiation Oncology consensus guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in stages I and II invasive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.53.3935 Google Scholar
- 31.Freedman G, Fowble B, Hanlon A et al (1999) Patients with early stage invasive cancer with close or positive margins treated with conservative surgery and radiation have an increased risk of breast recurrence that is delayed by adjuvant systemic therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 44(5):1005–1015CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 32.Goldstein NS, Kestin L, Vicini F (2003) Factors associated with ipsilateral breast failure and distant metastases in patients with invasive breast carcinoma treated with breast-conserving therapy. A clinicopathologic study of 607 neoplasms from 583 patients. Am J Clin Pathol 120(4):500–527. doi: 10.1309/8941-vdaj-mky2-gclx CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 41.Liau SS, Cariati M, Noble D et al (2010) Audit of local recurrence following breast conservation surgery with 5-mm target margin and hypofractionated 40-Gray breast radiotherapy for invasive breast cancer. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 92(7):562–568. doi: 10.1308/003588410x12699663903476 PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 42.Livi L, Meattini I, Franceschini D et al (2013) Radiotherapy boost dose-escalation for invasive breast cancer after breast-conserving surgery: 2093 patients treated with a prospective margin-directed policy. Radiother Oncol 108(2):273–278. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2013.02.009 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 44.Lupe K, Truong PT, Alexander C et al (2011) Subsets of women with close or positive margins after breast-conserving surgery with high local recurrence risk despite breast plus boost radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 81(4):e561–e568. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.02.021 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar