Advertisement

International Journal of Clinical Oncology

, Volume 20, Issue 3, pp 480–489 | Cite as

Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with concurrent liposomal-encapsulated doxorubicin, paclitaxel and trastuzumab for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer in clinical practice

  • Joaquín GaviláEmail author
  • Ángel Guerrero
  • Miguel Ángel Climent
  • Aranzazu Fernández
  • Francisco Gozalbo
  • María Carrascosa
  • Josefina Camps
  • Vicente Guillem
  • Amparo Ruiz
Original Article

Abstract

Background

Based on previous results obtained with non-pegylated liposomal-encapsulated doxorubicin (TLC-D99) together with paclitaxel and trastuzumab in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (BC), a similar regimen was evaluated in the neoadjuvant setting in a prospectively selected series of consecutive patients with clinical stage II–III BC. Primary and secondary objectives included the rate of pathologic complete response (pCR), safety, and predictive factors of pCR.

Methods

Patients received six cycles of TLC-D99 (50 mg/m2 every 3 weeks), paclitaxel (80 mg/m2 weekly) and trastuzumab (4 mg/kg initial dose and 2 mg/kg weekly). All patients underwent surgery after treatment. pCR was defined as the absence of invasive cancer cells in the breast and the axilla.

Results

Sixty-two patients with a median age of 46.6 years were analyzed. Stage IIIA was diagnosed in 43.5 % of patients and 14.5 % had inflammatory BC. Conservative surgery was performed in 46.8 % of the patients and pCR was achieved in 63 % (95 % CI 50.5–75.5). Patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-negative tumors presented a significantly higher pCR rate than patients with ER-positive tumors (74.4 vs 43.5 %; P = 0.028). Forty-five patients (72.6 %) completed study treatment and 80.6 % received at least five treatment cycles. No patients developed congestive heart failure and 14.5 % of patients showed a ≥10 % decrease in the left ventricular ejection fraction.

Conclusion

The triple combination therapy assessed is effective and safe, offering a high pCR rate in patients with HER2-positive BC.

Keywords

Antibodies Breast neoplasm Drug therapy Prospective study Treatment outcome 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank HealthCo (Madrid, Spain) for assistance in the preparation of this manuscript. The financial support of this project was provided by Teva Pharma. Editorial assistance was provided by Mary Hines of inScience Communications, Springer Healthcare; this assistance was also funded by Teva Pharma.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Bear HD, Anderson S, Smith RE et al (2006) Sequential preoperative or postoperative docetaxel added to preoperative doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide for operable breast cancer: national surgical adjuvant breast and bowel project protocol B-27. J Clin Oncol 24(13):2019–2027PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fisher B, Brown A, Mamounas E et al (1997) Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on local-regional disease in women with operable breast cancer: findings from national surgical adjuvant breast and bowel project B-18. J Clin Oncol 15(7):2483–2493PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fisher B, Bryant J, Wolmark N et al (1998) Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on the outcome of women with operable breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 16(8):2672–2685PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gianni L, Baselga J, Eiermann W et al (2005) Feasibility and tolerability of sequential doxorubicin/paclitaxel followed by cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil and its effects on tumor response as preoperative therapy. Clin Cancer Res 11(24 pt 1):8715–8721PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mauri D, Pavlidis N, Loannidis JP (2005) Neoadjuvant versus adjuvant systemic treatment in breast cancer: a meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst 97(3):188–194PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rastogi P, Anderson SJ, Bear HD et al (2008) Preoperative chemotherapy: updates of national surgical adjuvant breast and bowel project protocols B-18 and B-27. J Clin Oncol 26(5):778–785PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    van der Hage JA, van de Velde CJ, Julien JP et al (2001) Preoperative chemotherapy in primary operable breast cancer: results from the European organization for research and treatment of cancer trial 10902. J Clin Oncol 19(22):4224–4237PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wolmark N, Wang J, Mamounas E et al (2001) Preoperative chemotherapy in patients with operable breast cancer: 9-year results from National surgical adjuvant breast and bowel project B-18. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 30:96–102PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fernandez-Morales LA, Segui MA, Andreu X et al (2007) Analysis of the pathologic response to primary chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced breast cancer grouped according to estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2 status. Clin Breast Cancer 7(7):559–564PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Huber KE, Carey LA, Wazer DE (2009) Breast cancer molecular subtypes in patients with locally advanced disease: impact on prognosis, patterns of recurrence, and response to therapy. Semin Radiat Oncol 19(4):204–210PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rouzier R, Perou CM, Symmans WF et al (2005) Breast cancer molecular subtypes respond differently to preoperative chemotherapy. Clin Cancer Res 11(16):5678–5685PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Burstein HJ, Harris LN, Gelman R et al (2003) Preoperative therapy with trastuzumab and paclitaxel followed by sequential adjuvant doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide for HER2 overexpressing stage II or III breast cancer: a pilot study. J Clin Oncol 21(1):46–53PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Coudert BP, Arnould L, Moreau L et al (2006) Pre-operative systemic (neo-adjuvant) therapy with trastuzumab and docetaxel for HER2-overexpressing stage II or III breast cancer: results of a multicenter phase II trial. Ann Oncol 17(3):409–414PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Coudert BP, Largillier R, Arnould L et al (2007) Multicenter phase II trial of neoadjuvant therapy with trastuzumab, docetaxel, and carboplatin for human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-overexpressing stage II or III breast cancer: results of the GETN(A)-1 trial. J Clin Oncol 25(19):2678–2684PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pritchard KI, Messersmith H, Elavathil L et al (2008) HER-2 and topoisomerase II as predictors of response to chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 26(5):736–744PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pritchard KI, Shepherd LE, O’Malley FP et al (2006) HER2 and responsiveness of breast cancer to adjuvant chemotherapy. N Engl J Med 354(20):2103–2111PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Buzdar AU, Ibrahim NK, Francis D et al (2005) Significantly higher pathologic complete remission rate after neoadjuvant therapy with trastuzumab, paclitaxel, and epirubicin chemotherapy: results of a randomized trial in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive operable breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 23(16):3676–3685PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Buzdar AU, Valero V, Ibrahim NK et al (2007) Neoadjuvant therapy with paclitaxel followed by 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy and concurrent trastuzumab in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive operable breast cancer: an update of the initial randomized study population and data of additional patients treated with the same regimen. Clin Cancer Res 13(1):228–233PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gianni L, Eiermann W, Semiglazov V et al (2010) Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with trastuzumab followed by adjuvant trastuzumab versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone, in patients with HER2-positive locally advanced breast cancer (the NOAH trial): a randomised controlled superiority trial with a parallel HER2-negative cohort. Lancet 375(9712):377–384PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Batist G, Ramakrishnan G, Rao CS et al (2001) Reduced cardiotoxicity and preserved antitumor efficacy of liposome-encapsulated doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide compared with conventional doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide in a randomized, multicenter trial of metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 19(5):1444–1454PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Harris L, Batist G, Belt R et al (2002) Liposome-encapsulated doxorubicin compared with conventional doxorubicin in a randomized multicenter trial as first-line therapy of metastatic breast carcinoma. Cancer 94(1):25–36PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    O’Brien ME, Wigler N, Inbar M et al (2004) Reduced cardiotoxicity and comparable efficacy in a phase III trial of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin HCl (CAELYX/Doxil) versus conventional doxorubicin for first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol 15(3):440–449PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Cortes J, Di Cosimo S, Climent MA et al (2009) Nonpegylated liposomal doxorubicin (TLC-D99), paclitaxel, and trastuzumab in HER-2-overexpressing breast cancer: a multicenter phase I/II study. Clin Cancer Res 15(1):307–314PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J et al (2009) New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 45(2):228–247PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Chang JCN, Mayer IA, Forero-Torres A et al (2011) TBCRC 006: A multicenter phase II study of neoadjuvant lapatinib and trastuzumab in patients with HER2-overexpressing breast cancer [abstract]. J Clin Oncol 29(15 suppl):505Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Guarneri V, Broglio K, Kau SW et al (2006) Prognostic value of pathologic complete response after primary chemotherapy in relation to hormone receptor status and other factors. J Clin Oncol 24(7):1037–1044PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kuerer HM, Newman LA, Smith TL et al (1999) Clinical course of breast cancer patients with complete pathologic primary tumor and axillary lymph node response to doxorubicin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 17(2):460–469PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tanioka M, Shimizu C, Yonemori K et al (2010) Predictors of recurrence in breast cancer patients with a pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Br J Cancer 103(3):297–302PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Untch M, Fasching PA, Konecny GE et al (2011) Pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus trastuzumab predicts favorable survival in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-overexpressing breast cancer: results from the TECHNO trial of the AGO and GBG study groups. J Clin Oncol 29(25):3351–3357PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Antón A, Ruiz A, Plazaola A, Calvo L et al (2011) Phase II clinical trial of liposomal-encapsulated doxorubicin citrate and docetaxel, associated with trastuzumab, as neoadjuvant treatment in stages II and IIIA HER2-overexpressing breast cancer patients. GEICAM 2003-03 study. Ann Oncol 22(1):74–79PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Baselga J, Bradbury I, Eidtmann H et al (2012) Lapatinib with trastuzumab for HER2-positive early breast cancer (NeoALTTO): a randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 trial. Lancet 379(9816):633–640PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Gianni L, Pienkowski T, Im YH et al (2012) Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant pertuzumab and trastuzumab in women with locally advanced, inflammatory, or early HER2-positive breast cancer (NeoSphere): a randomised multicentre, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 13(1):25–32PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Guarneri V, Frassoldati A, Bottini A et al (2012) Preoperative chemotherapy plus trastuzumab, lapatinib, or both in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive operable breast cancer: results of the randomized phase II CHER-LOB study. J Clin Oncol 30(16):1989–1995PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Untch M, Loibl S, Bischoff J et al (2012) Lapatinib versus trastuzumab in combination with neoadjuvant anthracycline–taxane-based chemotherapy (GeparQuinto, GBG 44): a randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 13(2):135–144PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Untch M, Rezai M, Loibl S et al (2010) Neoadjuvant treatment with trastuzumab in HER2-positive breast cancer: results from the GeparQuattro study. J Clin Oncol 28(12):2024–2031PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Hyams D, Leichman G, Klein P (2009) Phase II trial of neoadjuvant pegylated liposomal doxorubicin with paclitaxel and trastuzumab in patients with operable Her-2-positive breast cancer. Cancer Res. 69 (suppl 24) Abstract 1098Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Schneeweiss A, Chia S, Hickish T (2011) Neoadjuvant pertuzumab and trastuzumab concurrent or sequential with an anthracycline-containing or concurrent with an anthracycline-free standard regimen: a randomized phase II Study (TRYPHAENA). Cancer Res 71:112s Abstract S5–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Lazaridis G, Pentheroudakis G, Pavlidis N (2008) Integrating trastuzumab in the neoadjuvant treatment of primary breast cancer: accumulating evidence of efficacy, synergy and safety. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 66(1):31–41PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Pegram M, Hsu S, Lewis G (1997) Inhibitory effects of combinations of HER2/Neu antibody and chemotherapeutic agents used for treatment of human breast cancers. Oncogene 18(13):2241–2251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Kanter PM, Bullard GA, Ginsberg RA et al (1993) Comparison of the cardiotoxic effects of liposomal doxorubicin (TLC D-99) versus free doxorubicin in beagle dogs. Vivo 7(1):17–26Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Kanter PM, Klaich G, Bullard GA et al (1994) Preclinical toxicology study of liposome encapsulated doxorubicin (TLC D-99) given intraperitoneally to dogs. Vivo 8(6):975–982Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Untch M, Eidtmann H, du Bois A et al (2004) Cardiac safety of trastuzumab in combination with epirubicin and cyclophosphamide in women with metastatic breast cancer: results of a phase I trial. Eur J Cancer 40(7):988–997PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Burris HA 3rd, Hurwitz HI, Dees EC et al (2005) Phase I safety, pharmacokinetics, and clinical activity study of lapatinib (GW572016), a reversible dual inhibitor of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinases, in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic carcinomas. J Clin Oncol 23(23):5305–5313PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Xia W, Gerard CM, Liu L et al (2005) Combining lapatinib (GW572016), a small molecule inhibitor of ErbB1 and ErbB2 tyrosine kinases, with therapeutic anti-ErbB2 antibodies enhances apoptosis of ErbB2-overexpressing breast cancer cells. Oncogene 24(41):6213–6221PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Spector NL, Blackwell K, Hurley J, et al. (2006) EGF103009, a phase II trial of lapatinib monotherapy in patients with relapsed/refractory inflammatory breast cancer (IBC): clinical activity and biologic predictors of response. J Clin Oncol. 24 (suppl 18): Abstract 502Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Storniolo AM, Burris H, Pegram M, et al. (2005) A phase I, open-label study of lapatinib (GW572016) plus trastuzumab; a clinically active regimen. J Clin Oncol. 23 (suppl 16): Abstract 559Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Adams CW, Allison DE, Flagella K et al (2006) Humanization of a recombinant monoclonal antibody to produce a therapeutic HER dimerization inhibitor, pertuzumab. Cancer Immunol Immunother 55(6):717–727PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Agus DB, Akita RW, Fox WD et al (2002) Targeting ligand-activated ErbB2 signaling inhibits breast and prostate tumor growth. Cancer Cell 2(2):127–137PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Agus DB, Gordon MS, Taylor C et al (2005) Phase I clinical study of pertuzumab, a novel HER dimerization inhibitor, in patients with advanced cancer. J Clin Oncol 23(11):2534–2543PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Nahta R, Hung MC, Esteva FJ (2004) The HER-2-targeting antibodies trastuzumab and pertuzumab synergistically inhibit the survival of breast cancer cells. Cancer Res 64(7):2343–2346PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Allison DE, Malik M, Qureshi F (2003) Pharmacokinetics of HER2-targeted rhuMAb 2C4 (pertuzumab) in patients with advanced solid malignancies: phase Ia results. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 22:197 Abstract 790Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Baselga J, Gelmon KA, Verma S et al (2010) Phase II trial of pertuzumab and trastuzumab in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive metastatic breast cancer that progressed during prior trastuzumab therapy. J Clin Oncol 28(7):1138–1144PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Baird RD, Tan DS, Kaye SB (2010) Weekly paclitaxel in the treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 7(10):575–582PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Gianni L, Dafni U, Gelber RD et al (2011) Treatment with trastuzumab for 1 year after adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer: a 4-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 12(3):236–244PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Piccart-Gebhart MJ, Procter M, Leyland-Jones B et al (2005) Trastuzumab after adjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-positive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 353(16):1659–1672PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Buzdar A, Suman VJ, Meric-Bernstam FA, et al. (2013) ACOSOG Z1041 (Alliance): definitive analysis of randomized neoadjuvant trial comparing FEC followed by paclitaxel plus trastuzumab (FEC → P + T) with paclitaxel plus trastuzumab followed by FEC plus trastuzumab (P + T → FEC + T) in HER2 + operable breast cancer [abstract 502]. J Clin Oncol. 31(Suppl)Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Ewer M, Suman VJ, Buzdar A, et al. (2013) ACOSOG Z1041 (Alliance): cardiac events (CE) among those receiving neoadjuvant anthracyclines (A) and taxanes with trastuzumab (T) for HER2 + breast cancer [abstract 526]. J Clin Oncol. 31(Suppl)Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Schneeweiss A, Chia S, Hickish T (2011) Neoadjuvant pertuzumab and trastuzumab concurrent or sequential with an anthracycline-containing or concurrent with an anthracycline-free standard regimen: a randomized phase II Study (TRYPHAENA). Cancer Res 71(suppl 24):112s Abstract nr S5–6Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Sataloff DM, Mason BA, Prestipino AJ et al (1995) Pathologic response to induction chemotherapy in locally advanced carcinoma of the breast: a determinant of outcome. J Am Coll Surg 180(3):297–306PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Chevallier B, Roche H, Olivier JP et al (1993) Inflammatory breast cancer. Pilot study of intensive induction chemotherapy (FEC-HD) results in a high histologic response rate. Am J Clin Oncol 16(3):223–228PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    von Minckwitz G, Kummel S, Vogel P et al (2008) Neoadjuvant vinorelbine–capecitabine versus docetaxel–doxorubicin–cyclophosphamide in early nonresponsive breast cancer: phase III randomized GeparTrio trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 100(8):542–551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Ogston KN, Miller ID, Payne S et al (2003) A new histological grading system to assess response of breast cancers to primary chemotherapy: prognostic significance and survival. Breast 12(5):320–327PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Fisher ER, Wang J, Bryant J et al (2002) Pathobiology of preoperative chemotherapy: findings from the National surgical adjuvant breast and bowel (NSABP) protocol B-18. Cancer 95(4):681–695PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Sinn HP, Schmid H, Junkermann H et al (1994) Histologic regression of breast cancer after primary (neoadjuvant) chemotherapy [in German]. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 54:552–558PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japan Society of Clinical Oncology 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joaquín Gavilá
    • 1
    • 5
    Email author
  • Ángel Guerrero
    • 1
  • Miguel Ángel Climent
    • 1
  • Aranzazu Fernández
    • 1
  • Francisco Gozalbo
    • 2
  • María Carrascosa
    • 3
  • Josefina Camps
    • 4
  • Vicente Guillem
    • 1
  • Amparo Ruiz
    • 1
  1. 1.Medical Oncology ServiceFundación Instituto Valenciano de OncologíaValenciaSpain
  2. 2.Pathological Anatomy ServiceFundación Instituto Valenciano de OncologíaValenciaSpain
  3. 3.Radiation Oncology ServiceFundación Instituto Valenciano de OncologíaValenciaSpain
  4. 4.Surgery ServiceFundación Instituto Valenciano de OncologíaValenciaSpain
  5. 5.Servicio de Oncología MédicaFundación Instituto Valenciano de OncologíaValenciaSpain

Personalised recommendations