Population Ecology

, Volume 58, Issue 3, pp 395–405 | Cite as

Density-dependent reproduction causes winter crashes in a common vole population

  • Adrien Pinot
  • Frédéric Barraquand
  • Edoardo Tedesco
  • Vincent Lecoustre
  • Vincent Bretagnolle
  • Bertrand Gauffre
Original article


Common voles in western France exhibit three-year population cycles with winter crashes after large outbreaks. During the winter of 2011–2012, we monitored survival, reproduction, recruitment and population growth rate of common voles at different densities (from low to outbreak densities) in natura to better understand density dependence of demographic parameters. Between October and April, the number of animals decreased irrespective of initial density. However, the decline was more pronounced when October density was higher (loss of ≈54 % of individuals at low density and 95 % at high density). Using capture-mark-recapture models with Pradel’s temporal symmetry approach, we found a negative effect of density on recruitment and reproduction. In contrast, density had a slightly positive effect on survival indicating that mortality did not drive the steeper declines in animal numbers at high density. We discuss these results in a population cycle framework, and suggest that crashes after outbreaks could reflect negative effects of density dependence on reproduction rather than changes in mortality rates.


CMR Density dependence Microtus arvalis Population cycles Recruitment Survival 



We are especially grateful for the help in the field provided by: Helene Lisse, Ronan Marrec, Marilyn Roncoroni, Mathieu Liaigre, Catherine Michel, Pomme Pinot, Alexandra Scohier, Jean-François Blanc and Samantha Yeo. We thank Laurent Crespin for constructive criticism, and Juliette Bloor for insightful editing and numerous suggestions. We also thank the anonymous reviewers and the editorial board of Population Ecology for their extensive and constructive comments that improved the manuscript. Finally, we thank the nine farmers that agreed to host the study in their fields. Partial funding was supported by EU BiodivERsA project “Ecocycles”. AP was supported by a Ph.D. grant from University Pierre & Marie Curie, Paris, France.

Supplementary material

10144_2016_552_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (866 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 866 kb)


  1. Anderson DR, Burnham KP, White GC (1998) Comparison of Akaike information criterion and consistent Akaike information criterion for model selection and statistical inference from capture-recapture studies. J Appl Stat 25:263–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barraquand F, Pinot A, Yoccoz NG, Bretagnolle V (2014) Overcompensation and phase effects in a cyclic common vole population: between first and second order cycles. J Anim Ecol 83:1367–1378CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Batzli GO, Getz LL, Hurley SS (1977) Suppression of growth and reproduction of microtine rodents by social factors. J Mammal 58:583–591CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Berryman A (2002) Population cycles, cause and analysis. In: Berryman A (ed) Population cycles. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 3–28Google Scholar
  5. Bonnet T, Crespin L, Pinot A, Bruneteau L, Bretagnolle V, Gauffre B (2013) How the common vole copes with modern farming: insights from a capture–mark–recapture experiment. Agric Ecosyst Environ 177:21–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boonstra R (1994) Population cycles in microtines: the senescence hypothesis. Evol Ecol 8:126–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Borchers D (2012) A non-technical overview of spatially explicit capture–recapture models. J Ornithol 152–2:435–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Briner T, Nentwig W, Airoldi JP (2005) Habitat quality of wildflower strips for common voles Microtus arvalis and its relevance for agriculture. Agric Ecosyst Environ 105:173–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brügger A, Netwig W, Airoldi JP (2010) The burrow system of the common vole. Mammalia 74:311–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference, 2nd edn. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Champlin AK (1971) Suppression of estrus in grouped mice: the effects of various densities and the possible nature of the stimulus. J Reprod Fertil 27:233–241CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Choquet R, Lebreton JD, Gimenez O, Reboulet AM, Pradel R (2009) UCARE: utilities for performing goodness of fit tests and manipulating capture-recapture data. Ecography 32:1071–1074CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dolby A (2009) Breeding suppression between two unrelated and initially unfamiliar females occurs with or without social tolerance in common voles (Microtus arvalis). J Ethol 27:299–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ergon T, Lambin X, Stenseth NC (2001a) Life-history traits of voles in a fluctuating population respond to the immediate environment. Nature 411:1043–1045CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Ergon T, MacKinnon JL, Stenseth NC, Boonstra R, Lambin X (2001b) Mechanisms for delayed density-dependent reproductive trait in field voles, Microtus agrestis: the importance of inherited environmental effects. Oikos 95:185–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ergon T, Speakman JR, Scantlebury M, Cavanagh R, Lambin X (2004) Optimal body size and energy expenditure during winter: why are voles smaller in declining populations? Am Nat 163:442–457CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Ergon T, Ergon R, Begon M, Telfer S, Lambin X (2011) Delayed density-dependent onset of spring reproduction in a fluctuating population of field voles. Oikos 120:934–940CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gauffre B, Estoup A, Bretagnolle V, Cosson JF (2008) Spatial genetic structure of a small rodent in a heterogeneous landscape. Mol Ecol 17:4619–4629CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Gilg O (2002) The summer decline of the collared lemming, Dicrostonyx groenlandicus, in high arctic Greenland. Oikos 99:499–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Goswami VR, Getz LL, Hostetler JA, Ozgul A, Oli MK (2011) Synergistic influences of phase, density, and climatic variation on the dynamics of fluctuating populations. Ecology 92:1680–1690CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Haapakoski M, Sundell J, Ylönen H (2012) Predation risk and food: opposite effects on overwintering survival and onset of breeding in a boreal rodent. J Anim Ecol 81:1183–1192CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Hansen T, Stenseth NC, Henttonen H (1999) Multiannual vole cycles and population regulation during long winters: an analysis of seasonal density dependence. Am Nat 154:129–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hanski I, Hansson L, Henttonen H (1991) Specialist predators, generalist predators and the microtine rodent cycle. J Anim Ecol 60:353–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hanski I, Henttonen H, Korpimäki E, Oksanen L, Turchin P (2001) Small-rodent dynamics and predation. Ecology 82:1505–1520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jánová E, Heroldova M, Nesvadbova J, Bryja J, Tkadlec E (2003) Age variation in fluctuating population of the common vole. Oecologia 137:527–532CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Klemola T, Koivula M, Korpimäki E, Norrdahl K (1997) Small mustelid predation slows growth of Microtus voles: a predator reduction experiment. J Anim Ecol 66:607–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Korpimäki E (1993) Regulation of multiannual vole cycles by density-dependent avian and mammalian predation. Oikos 66:359–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Korpimäki E, Norrdahl K (1998) Experimental reduction of predator reverses the crash phase of the small-rodent cycles. Ecology 79:2448–2455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Korpimäki E, Norrdahl K, Klemola T, Pettersen P, Stenseth NC (2002) Dynamic effects of predators on cyclic voles: field experimentation and model extrapolation. Proc R Soc B 269:991–997CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Krebs CJ (1996) Population cycles revisited. J Mammal 77:8–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Krebs CJ (2011) Of lemmings and snowshoe hares: the ecology of northern Canada. Proc R Soc B 278:481–489CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Krebs CJ (2013) Population fluctuations in rodents. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Krebs CJ, Myers JH (1974) Population cycles in small mammals. Adv Ecol Res 8:268–400Google Scholar
  34. Laake JL, Rexstad EA (2007) RMark. Appendix C. In: Cooch EG, White GC (eds) Program MARK: a gentle introduction, 14th edn. Accessed 1 Oct 2011
  35. Lambin X, Bretagnolle V, Yoccoz NG (2006) Vole population cycles in northern and southern Europe: is there a need for different explanations for single pattern? J Anim Ecol 75:340–349CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Le Quilliec P, Croci S (2006) Piégeage de micromammifères: une nouvelle boîte-dortoir pour le piège non vulnérant INRA. Le cahier des Techniques INRA, Numéro Spécial sur les Méthodes et outils pour l’observation et l’évaluation des milieux forestiers, prairiaux et aquatiques (in French)Google Scholar
  37. Łomnicki A (1995) Why do populations of small rodents cycle? A new hypothesis with numerical model. Evol Ecol 9:64–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ma W, Miao Z, Novotny MV (1998) Role of the adrenal gland and adrenal-mediated chemosignals in suppression of estrus in the house mouse: the Lee-Boot effect revisited. Biol Reprod 59:1317–1320CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Marchlewska-Koy A (1997) Sociogenic stress and rodent reproduction. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 21:699–703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Martinet L, Meunier M, Bureau P (1967) Cycle saisonnier de reproduction du campagnol des champs (Microtus arvalis). Annales de biologie animale, biochimie, biophysique 7:245–259 (in French) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mysterud A, Barton KA, Jedrzejewska B, Krasinski ZA, Niedzialkowska M, Kamler JK, Yoccoz NG, Stenseth NC (2007) Population ecology and conservation of endangered megafauna: the case of European bison in Białowieża primeval forest, Poland. Anim Conserv 10:77–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Nichols JD (1992) Capture–recapture models: using marked animals to study population dynamics. Bioscience 42:94–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Nichols JD, Hines EJ (2002) Approaches for the direct estimation of lambda, and demographic contributions to lambda, using capture-recapture data. J Appl Stat 29:539–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Nichols JD, Pollock KH (1983) Estimation methodology in contemporary small mammal capture-recapture. J Mammal 64:253–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Norrdahl K, Korpimäki E (1995) Mortality factors in a cyclic vole population. Proc R Soc B 261:49–53CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Oksanen L, Oksanen T (1992) Long-term microtine dynamics in north Fennoscandian tundra: the vole cycle and the lemming chaos. Ecography 15:226–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pinot A, Gauffre B, Bretagnolle V (2014) The interplay between seasonality and density: consequences for female breeding decisions in a small cyclic herbivore. BMC Ecol 14:17CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. Pradel R (1996) Utilization of capture–mark–recapture for the study of recruitment and population growth rate. Biometrics 52:703–709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. R Development Core Team (2009) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0.
  50. Reynolds JJ, Sherratt JA, White A, Lambin X (2013) A comparison of the dynamical impact of seasonal mechanisms in a herbivore–plant defense system. Theor Ecol 6:225–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sheriff MJ, Krebs CJ, Boonstra R (2009) The sensitive hare: sublethal effects of predator stress on reproduction in snowshoe hares. J Anim Ecol 78:1249–1258CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Singleton GR, Leirs H, Hinds LA, Zhang Z (1999) Ecologically-based management of rodent pests—re-evaluating our approach to an old problem. Ecologically-based Management of Rodent Pests. Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR), Canberra, pp 17–29Google Scholar
  53. Smith M, White A, Lambin X, Sherratt J, Begon M (2006) Delayed density-dependent season length alone can lead to rodent population cycles. Am Nat 167:695–704CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Stenseth NC (1999) Population cycles in voles and lemmings: density dependence and phase dependence in a stochastic world. Oikos 87:427–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Stenseth NC, Gustafsson TO, Hansson L, Ugland KI (1985) On the evolution of reproductive rates in microtine rodents. Ecology 66:1795–1808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Taylor RA, White A, Sherratt JA (2013) How do variations in seasonality affect population cycles? Proc R Soc B 280:20122714CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  57. Tkadlec E (1997) Early age of vaginal opening in common vole (Microtus arvalis). Folia Zool 46:1–7Google Scholar
  58. Tkadlec E, Zejda J (1995) Precocious breeding in female common voles and its relevance for rodent fluctuations. Oikos 73:231–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Tkadlec E, Zejda J (1998) Small rodent population fluctuations: the effects of age structure and seasonality. Evol Ecol 12:191–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Turchin P (2003) Complex population dynamics: a theoretical/empirical synthesis. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  61. Turchin P, Ostfeld RS (1997) Effects of density and season on the population rate of change in the meadow vole. Oikos 78:355–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. White GC, Burnham PK (1999) Program MARK: survival estimation from populations of marked animals. Bird Study 46:120–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Whittingham MJ, Stephens PA, Bradbury RB, Freckleton RP (2006) Why do we still use stepwise modeling in ecology and behaviour? J Anim Ecol 75:1182–1189CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Yoccoz NG, Ims RA (1999) Demography of small mammals in cold regions: the importance of environmental variability. Ecol Bull 47:137–144Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society of Population Ecology and Springer Japan 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Adrien Pinot
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Frédéric Barraquand
    • 3
    • 4
  • Edoardo Tedesco
    • 1
    • 3
  • Vincent Lecoustre
    • 1
    • 3
  • Vincent Bretagnolle
    • 1
    • 3
  • Bertrand Gauffre
    • 1
    • 3
    • 5
  1. 1.CEBC, UMR 7372CNRS - Université de La RochelleVilliers en BoisFrance
  2. 2.UR0874 Grassland Ecosystem Research Unit, INRA-UREPClermont-FerrandFrance
  3. 3.LTER “Plaine & Val de Sèvre”, CNRS-CEBCBeauvoir sur NiortFrance
  4. 4.Department of Arctic and Marine BiologyUniversity of TromsøTromsøNorway
  5. 5.INRA, USC 1339 (CEBC)Beauvoir sur NiortFrance

Personalised recommendations