Advertisement

Population Ecology

, Volume 57, Issue 4, pp 625–636 | Cite as

Evaluating the influence of diet-related variables on breeding performance and home range behaviour of a top predator

  • Rui Lourenço
  • Maria del Mar Delgado
  • Letizia Campioni
  • Erkki Korpimäki
  • Vincenzo Penteriani
Original article

Abstract

Diet composition is linked to reproductive performance directly or indirectly by other life-history traits, including home range behaviour. The relationships between prey abundance, diet and individual fitness have often been explored. However, these relationships are complex and difficult to disentangle, especially in vertebrate top predators. Here, we present the results of a long-term study using multi-model inference procedures to elucidate the influence of diet-related variables on breeding parameters and home range behaviour of a top predator, the eagle owl Bubo bubo. Superpredation, diet diversity, rat biomass and rabbit mean weight were the most important variables when analysing reproductive parameters, suggesting that less diverse diets with greater rabbit biomass percentage may benefit reproductive performance, whereas rat biomass percentage is apparently associated with greater variation of breeding success. Earlier laying dates seem to be associated with the consumption, on average, of smaller rabbits. On the other hand, edge density was the most relevant factor determining the variation in home range behaviour, with individual characteristics, such as age and sex, also being important. Although the relative importance of the diet-related variables was generally low, mean weight of alternative prey, diet diversity and rabbit biomass also helped to explain home range parameters. In an optimal foraging context, centred on the abundance of the main prey species, our results suggest that when rabbits are less available eagle owls may increase home range size in order to obtain alternative prey, increasing at the same time their dietary diversity, which may also require higher movement speed.

Keywords

Diet diversity Foraging theory Optimal diet Predator–prey relationships Prey size variation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the comments of David Serrano and two anonymous reviewers which improved a previous version of the manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. The Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (CGL2012–33240; FEDER co-financing) funded this study. R.L. (BPD/78241/2011) and L.C. (BPD/89904/2012) were supported by post-doctoral grants from Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (Portugal POPH/QREN). We trapped eagle owls under Junta de Andalucía-Consejería Medio Ambiente authorizations (SCFFS-AFR/GGG RS-260/02; SCFFS-AFR/CMM RS-1904/02), ensuring the welfare of all involved animals. All authors have expressed their explicit consent for the publication of this study.

Supplementary material

10144_2015_506_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (144 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 144 kb)

References

  1. Barton K (2013) MuMIn: multi-model inference. R package version 1.9.5. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=MuMIn. Accessed 30 Oct 2013
  2. Bivand RS, Pebesma E, Gomez-Rubio V (2013) Applied spatial data analysis with R, 2nd edn. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bjørnstad ON (2012) ncf: spatial nonparametric covariance functions. R package version 1.1-4. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ncf Accessed 30 Oct 2013
  4. Brown ME (1996) Assessing body condition in birds. Curr Ornithol 13:67–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference. A practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd edn. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Campioni L, Delgado MM, Lourenço R, Bastianelli G, Fernández N, Penteriani V (2013) Individual and spatio-temporal variations in the home range behaviour of a long-lived, territorial species. Oecologia 172:371–385CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Delgado MM, Penteriani V, Nams O (2009) How fledglings explore surroundings from fledging to dispersal. A case study with eagle owls Bubo bubo. Ardea 97:7–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Delibes-Mateos M, Redpath SM, Angulo E, Ferreras P, Villafuerte R (2007) Rabbits as a keystone species in southern Europe. Biol Conserv 137:149–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Delibes-Mateos M, Farfán MA, Olivero J, Vargas JM (2010) Land-use changes as a critical factor for long-term wild rabbit conservation in the Iberian Peninsula. Environ Conserv 37:169–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Díaz-Ruiz F, Delibes-Mateos M, García-Moreno JL, López-Martín JM, Ferreira C, Ferreras P (2013) Biogeographical patterns in the diet of an opportunistic predator: the red fox Vulpes vulpes in the Iberian Peninsula. Mamm Rev 43:59–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Donázar JA, Ceballos O (1989) Selective predation by eagle owls Bubo bubo on rabbits Oryctolagus cuniculus: age and sex preferences. Ornis Scand 20:117–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dormann CF, McPherson JM, Araújo MB, Bivand R, Bolliger J, Carl G, Davies RG, Hirzel A, Jetz W, Kissling D, Kühn I, Ohlemüller R, Peres-Neto PR, Peineking B, Schröder B, Schurr FM, Wilson R (2007) Methods to account for spatial autocorrelation in the analysis of species distributional data: a review. Ecography 30:609–628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dupuy G, Giraudoux P, Delattre P (2009) Numerical and dietary responses of a predator community in a temperate zone of Europe. Ecography 32:277–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Elkie P, Rempel R, Carr (1999) Patch analyst user’s manual: a tool for quantifying landscape structure. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources Northwest Science and Technology. http://flash.lakeheadu.ca/_rrempe/patch/. Accessed 06 Jun 2011
  15. Fernández M, Oria J, Sánchez R, González LM, Margalida A (2009) Space use of adult Spanish imperial eagles Aquila adalberti. Acta Ornithol 44:17–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fernandez-de-Simon J, Díaz-Ruiz F, Cirilli F, Sánchez F, Villafuerte R, Delibes-Mateos M, Ferreras P (2011) Towards a standardized index of European rabbit abundance in Iberian Mediterranean habitats. Eur J Wildlife Res 57:1091–1100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gil-Sánchez JM, Valenzuela G, Sánchez JF (1999) Iberian wild cat Felis silvestris tartessia predation on rabbit Oryctolagus cuniculus: functional response and age selection. Acta Theriol 44:421–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Godinho S, Mestre F, Ferreira JP, Machado R, Santos P (2013) Effectiveness of habitat management in the recovery of low-density populations of wild rabbit. Eur J Wildl Res 59:847–858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Griffiths R, Double MC, Orr K, Dawson RJG (1998) A DNA test to sex most birds. Mol Ecol 7:1071–1075CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Herrera CM, Hiraldo F (1976) Food-niche and trophic relationships among European owls. Ornis Scand 7:29–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hiraldo F, Andrada J, Parreño FF (1975) Diet of the eagle owl (Bubo bubo) in Mediterranean Spain. Doñana Acta Vertebr 2:161–177Google Scholar
  22. Hooge PN, Eichenlaub B (2000) Animal movement extension to ArcView, version 2.0.3. Biological Science Centre, US Geological Survey, Anchorage, Alaska. http://alaska.usgs.gov/science/biology/spatial/gistools/index.php Accessed 06 Jun 2014
  23. Janes SW (1984) Influences of territory composition and interspecific competition on red-tailed hawk reproductive success. Ecology 65:862–870CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Katzner TE, Bragin EA, Knick ST, Smith AT (2005) Relationship between demographics and diet specificity of imperial eagles Aquila heliaca in Kazakhstan. Ibis 147:576–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kenward R (1982) Goshawk hunting behaviour, and range size as a function of food and habitat availability. J Anim Ecol 51:69–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Korpimäki E (1986) Diet variation, hunting habitat and reproductive output of the kestrel Falco tinnunculus in the light of the optimal diet theory. Ornis Fenn 63:84–90Google Scholar
  27. Korpimäki E (1992a) Fluctuating food abundance determines the lifetime reproductive success of male Tengmalm’s owls. J Anim Ecol 61:103–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Korpimäki E (1992b) Diet composition, prey choice, and breeding success of long-eared owls: effects of multiannual fluctuations in food abundance. Can J Zool 70:2373–2381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Korpimäki E, Hakkarainen H (1991) Fluctuating food supply affects the clutch size of Tengmalm’s owl independent of laying date. Oecologia 85:543–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Korpimäki E, Norrdahl K (1989) Predation of Tengmalm’s owls: numerical responses, functional responses and dampening impact on population fluctuations of microtines. Oikos 54:154–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Korpimäki E, Norrdahl K (1991) Numerical and functional responses of kestrels, short-eared owls, and long-eared owls to vole densities. Ecology 72:814–826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Korpimäki E, Sulkava S (1987) Diet and breeding performance of Ural owls Strix uralensis under fluctuating food conditions. Ornis Fenn 64:57–66Google Scholar
  33. Korpimäki E, Wiehn J (1998) Clutch size of kestrels: seasonal decline and experimental evidence for food limitation under fluctuating food conditions. Oikos 83:259–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Korpimäki E, Huhtala K, Sulkava S (1990) Does the year to year variation in the diet of eagle and Ural owls support the alternative prey hypothesis? Oikos 58:47–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lourenço R (2006) The food habits of Eurasian eagle-owls in southern Portugal. J Raptor Res 40:297–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lourenço R, Santos SM, Rabaça JE, Penteriani V (2011) Superpredation patterns in four large European raptors. Popul Ecol 53:175–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. MacArthur RH, Pianka ER (1966) On optimal use of a patchy environment. Am Nat 100:603–609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Marchesi L, Sergio F, Pedrini P (2002) Costs and benefits of breeding in human-altered landscapes for the eagle owl Bubo bubo. Ibis 144:E164–E177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Marchetti K, Price T (1989) Differences in the foraging of juvenile and adult birds—the importance of developmental constraints. Biol Rev 64:51–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Margalida A, Benítez JR, Sánchez-Zapata JA, Ávila E, Arenas R, Donázar JA (2012) Long-term relationship between diet breadth and breeding success in a declining population of Egyptian vultures Neophron percnopterus. Ibis 154:184–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Marti CM, Korpimäki E, Jaksic FM (1993) Trophic structure of raptor communities: a three-continent comparison and synthesis. Curr Ornithol 10:47–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Martínez JE, Calvo JF (2001) Diet and breeding success of eagle owl in southeastern Spain: effect of rabbit haemorrhagic disease. J Raptor Res 35:259–262Google Scholar
  43. Martínez JA, Zuberogoitia I (2001) The response of the eagle owl (Bubo bubo) to an outbreak of the rabbit haemorrhagic disease. J Ornithol 142:204–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Martínez JA, Zuberogoitia I, Alonso R (2002) Rapaces nocturnas: guía para la identificación de la edad y el sexo en las estrigiformes ibéricas. Monticola ediciones, Madrid (in Spanish)Google Scholar
  45. Moleón M, Sánchez-Zapata JA, Real J, García-Charton JA, Gil-Sánchez JM, Palma L, Bautista J, Bayle P (2009) Large-scale spatio-temporal shifts in the diet of a predator mediated by an emerging infectious disease of its main prey. J Biogeogr 36:1502–1515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Moleón M, Sánchez-Zapata JA, Gil-Sánchez JM, Ballesteros-Duperón E, Barea-Azcón JM, Virgós E (2012) Predator-prey relationships in a Mediterranean vertebrate system: Bonelli’s eagles, rabbits and partridges. Oecologia 168:679–689CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Moreno S, Villafuerte R (1995) Traditional management of scrubland for the conservation of rabbits Oryctolagus cuniculus and their predators in Doñana national park, Spain. Biol Conserv 73:81–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Moreno S, Villafuerte R, Delibes M (1996) Cover is safe during the day but dangerous at night: the use of vegetation by European wild rabbits. Can J Zool 74:1656–1660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Newton I, Marquiss M (1984) Seasonal trend in the breeding performance of sparrowhawks. J Anim Ecol 53:809–829CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ontiveros D, Pleguezuelos JM, Caro J (2005) Prey density, prey detectability and food habits: the case of Bonelli’s eagle and the conservation measures. Biol Conserv 123:19–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Penteriani V, Delgado MM (2008) Brood-switching in eagle owl Bubo bubo fledglings. Ibis 150:816–819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Penteriani V, Gallardo M, Roche P (2002) Landscape structure and food supply affect eagle owl (Bubo bubo) density and breeding performance: a case of intra-population heterogeneity. J Zool 257:365–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Penteriani V, Delgado MM, Maggio C, Aradis A, Sergio F (2005) Development of chicks and predispersal behaviour of young in the eagle owl Bubo bubo. Ibis 147:155–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Penteriani V, Delgado MM, Bartolommei P, Maggio C, Alonso-Alvarez C, Holloway GJ (2008) Owls and rabbits: predation against substandard individuals of an easy prey. J Avian Biol 39:215–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Penteriani V, Delgado MM, Campioni L, Lourenço R (2010) Moonlight makes owls more chatty. PLoS one 5(1):e8696PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Penteriani V, Rutz C, Kenward R (2013) Hunting behaviour and breeding performance of northern goshawks Accipiter gentilis, in relation to resource availability, sex, age and morphology. Naturwissenschaften 100:935–942CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Pérez-García JM, Sánchez-Zapata JA, Botella F (2012) Distribution and breeding performance of a high-density eagle owl Bubo bubo population in southeast Spain. Bird Study 59:22–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Pérez-Mellado V (1980) Alimentación del búho real (Bubo bubo L.) en España central. Ardeola 25:93–112 (in Spanish) Google Scholar
  59. Perry G, Pianka ER (1997) Animal foraging: past, present and future. Trends Ecol Evol 12:360–364CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Pinheiro JC, Bates DM (2000) Mixed-effects models in S and S-PLUS. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. R Core Team (2013) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/. Accessed 30 Oct 2013
  62. Santangeli A, Hakkarainen H, Laaksonen T, Korpimäki E (2012) Home range size is determined by habitat composition but feeding rate by food availability in male Tengmalm’s owls. Anim Behav 83:1115–1123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Schoener TW (1971) Theory of feeding strategies. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 2:369–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Serrano D (2000) Relationship between raptors and rabbits in the diet of eagle owls in southwestern Europe: competition removal or food stress? J Raptor Res 34:305–310Google Scholar
  65. Sih A, Christensen B (2001) Optimal diet theory: when does it work, and when and why does it fail? Anim Behav 61:379–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Silverman BW (1986) Density estimation for statistics and data analysis. Monographs on statistics and applied probability. Chapman and Hall, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Soriguer RC (1981a) Estructuras de sexos y edades en una población de conejos (Oryctolagus cuniculus L.) de Andalucía occidental. Doñana Acta Vertebrata 8:225–236 (in Spanish) Google Scholar
  68. Soriguer RC (1981b) Biología y dinamica de una población de conejos (Oryctolagus cuniculus L.) en Andalucia occidental. Doñana Acta Vertebrata 8–3 (special issue) (in Spanish)Google Scholar
  69. Steenhof K, Kochert MN (1988) Dietary responses of three raptor species to changing prey densities in a natural environment. J Anim Ecol 57:37–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Terraube J, Arroyo B, Madders M, Mougeot F (2011) Diet specialisation and foraging efficiency under fluctuating vole abundance: a comparison between generalist and specialist avian predators. Oikos 120:234–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Virgós E, Llorente M, Cortés Y (1999) Geographical variation in genet (Genetta genetta L.) diet: a literature review. Mamm Rev 29:119–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Warnes GR, Bolker B, Bonebakker L, Gentleman R, Liaw WHA, Lumley T, Maechler M, Magnusson A, Moeller S, Schwartz M, Venables B (2013) gplots: Various R programming tools for plotting data. R package version 2.11.3. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=gplots. Accessed 30 Oct 2013
  73. Watson J (1997) The golden eagle. T. and A.D Poyser, LondonGoogle Scholar
  74. Werner EE, Hall DJ (1974) Optimal foraging and the size selection of prey by the bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus). Ecology 55:1042–1052CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Whitfield DP, Reid R, Haworth PF, Madders M, Marquiss M, Tingay R, Fielding AH (2009) Diet specificity is not associated with increased reproductive performance of golden eagles Aquila chrysaetos in western Scotland. Ibis 151:255–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Worton BJ (1989) Kernel methods for estimating the utilization distribution in home range studies. Ecology 70:164–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Wunderle JM (1991) Age-specific foraging proficiency in birds. Curr Ornithol 8:273–324Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society of Population Ecology and Springer Japan 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Labor-Laboratory of Ornithology, Instituto de Ciências Agrárias e Ambientais MediterrânicasUniversidade de Évora-Núcleo da MitraÉvoraPortugal
  2. 2.Department of Conservation BiologyEstación Biológica de Doñana, CSICSevilleSpain
  3. 3.Metapopulation Research Group, Department of BiosciencesUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland
  4. 4.MARE, Marine and Environmental Sciences CentreISPA Instituto UniversitárioLisbonPortugal
  5. 5.Section of Ecology, Department of BiologyUniversity of TurkuTurkuFinland
  6. 6.Research Unit of Biodiversity (UMIB, UO-CSIC-PA)Oviedo University-Campus MieresMieresSpain

Personalised recommendations