Species versus genotypic diversity of a nitrogen-fixing plant functional group in a metacommunity
- 212 Downloads
Exploring species and genetic diversity interactions provides new opportunities for furthering our understanding of the ecology and evolution of population and community dynamics, and for predicting responses of ecosystems to environmental change. Theory predicts that species diversity within communities and genetic diversity within populations will covary positively, because either species and genetic diversity interact synergistically or they respond in parallel fashion to common habitat conditions. We tested the hypothesis of positive covariation between species and genotypic diversity in a metacommunity of the species-rich southwest Australian flora. We hypothesised that the connection between genotypic diversity and species diversity is strong within functional groups, but weak or non-existent if the species considered extend beyond the functional group. We show that allelic richness of Daviesia triflora, an ant-dispersed pea, covaries positively with the species richness of six co-occurring nitrogen-fixing legume species. No pattern can be detected between allelic richness of D. triflora and species richness of ant-dispersed species when four non-legumes are added. We also show that genetic diversity of D. triflora is not governed by the same environmental factors that determine the presence of a group of large-shrub/small-tree species in the same metacommunity. This study shows that species and genetic diversity covariation are more likely to be confined to within, rather than between, plant functional groups.
KeywordsFunctional group Legume Microsatellite Metacommunity South-West Australian Floristic Region
This is contribution CEDD30-2008 of the Centre for Ecosystem Diversity and Dynamics, Curtin University. We thank the Australian Research Council for funds (DP0556767) and Alex Devine for field assistance.
- He T, Lamont BB (2009) High microsatellite genetic diversity fails to predict greater population resistance to extreme drought. Conserv Genet. doi: 10.1007/s10592-009-9971-4
- Houston TF (2000) Native bees on wildflowers in Western Australia. A synopsis of bee visitation of wildflowers based on the bee collection of the Western Australian Museum. Special publication no. 2, Western Australian Insect Study Society, PerthGoogle Scholar
- Lamont BB (1995) Mineral nutrient relations in mediterranean regions of California, Chile and Australia. In: Arroya MT, Zedler PH, Fox MD (eds) Ecology and biogeography of mediterranean ecosystems in Chile, California and Australia. Springer, New York, pp 211–235Google Scholar
- Law R (1985) Evolution in a mutualistic environment. In: Boucher DH (ed) The biology of mutualism: ecology and evolution. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 145–170Google Scholar
- Milewski AV, Bond WJ (1982) Convergence of myrmecochory in mediterranean Australia and South Africa. In: Buckley RC (ed) Ant-plant interactions in Australia. Junk, The Hague, pp 84–98Google Scholar
- Orians GH, Paine RT (1983) Convergent evolution at the community level. In: Futuyma DJ, Slatkin M (eds) Coevolution. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, pp 431–458Google Scholar
- Parker MA, Spoerke JM (1998) Geographic structure of lineage associations in a plant-bacterial mutualism. J Evol Biol 11:549–562Google Scholar
- Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Chase MW, Mort ME, Albach DC, Zanis M, Savolainen V, Hahn WH, Hoot SB, Fay MF, Axtell M, Swensen SM, Prince LM, Kress WJ, Nixon KC, Farris JS (2000) Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from 18S rDNA. rbcL, and atpB sequences. Bot J Linn Soc 133:381–461Google Scholar