Population Ecology

, Volume 51, Issue 4, pp 471–479

Subsampling photographic capture-recapture data of tigers (Panthera tigris) to minimize closure violation and improve estimate precision: a case study

  • Abishek Harihar
  • Bivash Pandav
  • Surendra Prakash Goyal
Original Article

Abstract

Most studies using photographic capture-recapture methodology estimate parameters of interest with ecological and sampling uncertainties. However, the effect of sampling effort on assumption violation and estimate precision has seldom been described using empirical data in studies estimating population size of tigers (Panthera tigris tigris). In this study, we evaluate the influence of trap effort (trap area, mean cell area and trap density) on the assumption of geographic closure and their relationship with estimated capture probability. We do this by subsampling capture histories obtained for tigers from 30 trapping stations within the Chilla range of Rajaji National Park, India. We assessed the importance of trapping effort on geographic closure by estimating fidelity (\( \overset{\lower0.5em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\frown}$}}{F} \)) and immigration (\( \overset{\lower0.5em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\frown}$}}{f} \)) under the Pradel model. Estimate precision (CV% [\( \hat{N} \)]) was evaluated based on estimates of capture probability (\( \hat{p} \)). Results of the Pradel analysis suggested that larger trap area (TA) ensured geographic closure, while high trap densities (TD) exhibited sex-specific heterogeneity in recapture probabilities p. Simulation results suggested a significant positive correlation between estimates of (\( \hat{p} \)) and TD. With increase in estimated capture probability, estimate precision (CV% [\( \hat{N} \)]) also improved sharply. Comparison of prior studies towards optimizing sampling strategies is often compromised due to the difference in scale and methods of sampling. Therefore, we urge that subsampling within a dataset as illustrated in our study may prove to be an advantageous step towards standardizing photographic capture-recapture sampling methodology for management objectives.

Keywords

Capture probability Fidelity Immigration Pradel model Trap area Trap density 

References

  1. Boulanger J, McLellan BN (2001) Closure violation bias in DNA based mark-recapture population estimates of grizzly bears. Can J Zool 79:642–651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boulanger J, White GC, McLellan BN, Woods JG, Proctor MF, Himmer S (2002) A meta-analysis of grizzly bear DNA mark–recapture projects in British Columbia. Ursus 13:137–152Google Scholar
  3. Brassel KE, Reif D (1979) A procedure to generate Thiessen polygons. Geogr Anal 325:31–36Google Scholar
  4. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (1998) Model selection and inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Chauhan DS, Harihar A, Goyal SP, Qureshi Q, Lal PR, Mathur VB (2005) Estimating tiger population using camera traps in Ranthambore National Park. Wildlife Institute of India, DehradunGoogle Scholar
  6. Chauhan DS, Singh R, Mishra S, Dadda T, Goyal SP (2006) Estimation of tiger population in an intensive study area of Pakke Tiger Reserve, Arunachal Pradesh. Wildlife Institute of India, DehradunGoogle Scholar
  7. Cormack RM (1964) Estimates of survival from the sightings of marked animals. Biometrika 51:429–438Google Scholar
  8. Efford M (2004) Density estimation in live-trapping studies. Oikos 106:598–610. doi:10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.13043.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gittleman JL, Harvey PH (1982) Carnivore home range size, metabolic needs and ecology. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 10:57–63. doi:10.1007/BF00296396 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Harihar A, Pandav B, Goyal SP (2008) Responses of tiger (Panthera tigris) and their prey to removal of anthropogenic influences in Rajaji National Park, India. Eur J Wildl Res. doi:10.1007/s10344-008-0219-2
  11. Johnsingh AJT, Ramesh K, Qureshi Q, David A, Goyal SP, Rawat GS, Rajapandian K, Prasad S (2004) Conservation status of tiger and associated species in the Terai Arc Landscape. Wildlife Institute of India, DehradunGoogle Scholar
  12. Johnson A, Vongkhamheng C, Hedemark M, Saithongdam T (2006) Effects of human-carnivore conflict on tiger (Panthera tigris) and prey populations in Lao PDR. Anim Conserv 9:421–430. doi:10.1111/j.1469-1795.2006.00049.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jolly GM (1965) Explict estimates from capture-recapture data with both death and immigration: stochastic model. Biometrika 52:225–247PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Karanth KU (1995) Estimating tiger Panthera tigris populations from camera-trapping data using capture-recapture models. Biol Conserv 71:333–338. doi:10.1016/0006-3207(94)00057-W CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Karanth KU, Kumar NS (2003) Distribution and dynamics of tiger and prey populations in Maharashtra, India. Centre for Wildlife Studies, BangaloreGoogle Scholar
  16. Karanth KU, Nichols JD (1998) Estimation of tiger densities using photographic captures and recaptures. Ecology 79:2852–2862CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Karanth KU, Nichols JD (2000) Ecological status and conservation of tigers in India. Centre for Wildlife Studies, BangaloreGoogle Scholar
  18. Karanth KU, Nichols JD (2002) Monitoring tigers and their prey: a manual for researchers, managers and conservationists in tropical Asia. Centre for Wildlife Studies, BangaloreGoogle Scholar
  19. Karanth KU, Stith BM (1999) Prey depletion as a critical determinant of tiger densities. In: Seidensticker J, Christie S, Jackson P (eds) Riding the tiger: tiger conservation in human-dominated landscapes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 100–113Google Scholar
  20. Karanth KU, Sunquist ME (2000) Behavioural correlates of predation by tiger Panthera tigris, leopard Panthera pardus and dhole Cuon alpinus in Nagarahole, India. J Zool (Lond) 250:255–265. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.2000.tb01076.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Karanth KU, Chundawat RS, Nichols JD, Kumar NS (2004) Estimation of tiger densities in the tropical dry forests of Panna, Central India, using photographic capture-recapture sampling. Anim Conserv 7:285–290. doi:10.1017/S1367943004001477 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Karanth KU, Nichols JD, Kumar NS, Hines JE (2006) Assessing tiger population dynamics using photographic capture-recapture sampling. Ecology 87:2925–2937. doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[2925:ATPDUP]2.0.CO;2 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kawanishi K, Sunquist ME (2004) Conservation status of tigers in a primary rainforest of Peninsular Malaysia. Biol Conserv 120:329–344. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2004.03.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kostyrya AV, Belozor AA (2002) Report on a camera trapping survey of tigers in Ussuriski Zapovednik and adjacent territory for winter and summer 2002. Vladivostok (in Russian)Google Scholar
  25. Linkie M, Haidirb IA, Nugrohoc A, Dinatac Y (2008) Conserving tigers Panthera tigris in selectively logged Sumatran forests. Biol Conserv 141:2410–2415. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2008.07.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lynam AJ, Laidlaw R, Shaharuddin W, Noordin W, Elagupillay S, Bennett EL (2007) Assessing the conservation status of the tiger Panthera tigris at priority sites in Peninsular Malaysia. Oryx 41:454–462. doi:10.1017/S0030605307001019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lynam AJ, Rabinowitz A, Myint T, Maung M, Latt KW, Po SHT (2008) Estimating abundance with sparse data: tigers in northern Myanmar. Popul Ecol. doi:10.1007/s10144-008-0093-5
  28. McDougal C (1977) The face of the tiger. Rivington Books, LondonGoogle Scholar
  29. Miquelle DG, Smirnov EN, Merrill TW, Myslenkov AE, Quigley HB, Hornocker MG, Schleyer B (1999) Hierarchical spatial analysis of Amur tiger relationships to habitat and prey. In: Seidensticker J, Christie S, Jackson P (eds) Riding the tiger: tiger conservation in human-dominated landscapes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 71–99Google Scholar
  30. O’Brien TG, Kinnaird MF, Wibisono HT (2003) Crouching tigers, hidden prey: Sumatran tiger and prey populations in a tropical forest landscape. Anim Conserv 6:131–139. doi:10.1017/S1367943003003172 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Otis DL, Burnham KP, White GC, Anderson DR (1978) Statistical inference from capture data of closed populations. Wildl Monogr 62:1–135Google Scholar
  32. Pledger S (2000) Unified maximum likelihood estimates for closed capture-recapture models for mixtures. Biometrics 56:434–442. doi:10.1111/j.0006-341X.2000.00434.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pollock KH, Nichols JD, Brownie C, Hines JE (1990) Statistical inference for capture-recapture experiments. Wildl Monogr 107:1–97Google Scholar
  34. Pradel R (1996) Utilization of mark—recapture for the study of recruitment and population growth rate. Biometrics 52:703–709. doi:10.2307/2532908 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Schaller GB (1967) The deer and the tiger. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  36. Seber GAF (1965) A note on the multiple recapture census. Biometrika 52:249–259PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Sharma R (2005) Evaluating tiger (Panthera tigris) population estimation approaches in a high density area in Kanha Tiger Reserve. M.Sc.Thesis/Dissertation, Saurashtra University, RajkotGoogle Scholar
  38. Simcharoen S, Pattanavibool A, Karanth KU, Nichols JD, Kumar NS (2007) How many tigers Panthera tigris are there in Huai Kha Khaeng Wildlife Sanctuary, Thailand? An estimate using photographic capture–recapture sampling. Oryx 41:447–453. doi:10.1017/S0030605307414107 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Smith JLD (1993) The role of dispersal in structuring the Chitwan tiger population. Behaviour 124:165–195. doi:10.1163/156853993X00560 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Smith JLD, McDougal C, Sunquist ME (1987) Female land tenure system in tigers. In: Tilson RL, Seal US (eds) Tigers of the world. Noyes Publications, New Jersey, pp 97–109Google Scholar
  41. Sunquist ME (1981) Social organization of tigers Panthera tigris in Royal Chitwan National Park, Nepal. Smithson Contrib Zool 336:1–98Google Scholar
  42. Wegge P, Pokheral C, Jnawali SR (2004) Effects of trapping effort and trap shyness on estimates of tiger abundance from camera trap studies. Anim Conserv 7:251–256. doi:10.1017/S1367943004001441 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. White GC, Burnham KP (1999) Program MARK: survival estimation from populations of marked animals. Bird Study 46:120–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. White GC, Anderson DR, Burnham KP, Otis DL (1982) Capture recapture and removal methods for sampling closed populations. LA-8787-NERP, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los AlamosGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society of Population Ecology and Springer 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Abishek Harihar
    • 1
  • Bivash Pandav
    • 1
    • 2
  • Surendra Prakash Goyal
    • 1
  1. 1.Wildlife Institute of IndiaDehradunIndia
  2. 2.WWF-International, C/o, WWF-Nepal ProgramKathmanduNepal

Personalised recommendations