Advertisement

Population Ecology

, Volume 50, Issue 4, pp 329–342 | Cite as

An intercontinental comparison of the dynamic behavior of mast seeding communities

  • Dave Kelly
  • Walter D. Koenig
  • Andrew M. Liebhold
Special Feature: Review Spatial Population Synchrony

Abstract

Cases of mast seeding, involving highly variable seed production synchronized over large geographic areas, provide dramatic examples of resource pulses that have been documented for most major world land masses. Here, we compare the dynamic behavior of two of these systems, with the goal of understanding differences in the long-term consequences of masting events to their respective communities. Responses to mast events in deciduous oak forests in eastern North America are characteristically complex and of low resilience. That is, each event produces long-lasting cascading effects in the community, ultimately influencing not only seed consumers such as rodents and deer, but also the parasites and prey of those consumers, diseases transmitted by those parasites, and outbreaks of insect herbivores. In contrast, despite more extreme resource pulsing in New Zealand Nothofagus forests, responses to mast events there are less complex and more resilient, i.e., producing only short-term (<2 years), smoothly damped, numerical responses by a few species, except after (rare) ‘double-mast’ events in consecutive years. A detailed examination of the two systems suggests some tentative explanations for the strongly contrasting dynamics of these systems. Firstly, the higher number of species involved in North America seems to reduce resilience by increasing food chain length, lags, and alternative prey, all of which increase the dynamic complexity compared with that in New Zealand. Secondly, lack of a shared evolutionary history among species did not necessarily reduce resilience. Some exotic species showed well-damped fluctuations (e.g., stoats (Mustela erminea L.) in New Zealand), while other exotics showed complex dynamics (e.g., gypsy moths (Lymantria dispar L.) in North America). Thirdly, recent extinctions of species such as the passenger pigeon (Ectopistes migratorius L.), once the dominant acorn predator in eastern North American forests, have likely produced qualitative changes in system dynamics in both communities. Fourthly, the North American community has more lags and hysteresis, which probably contribute to the greater dynamic complexity in eastern North America than in New Zealand Nothofagus forests. However, positive feedback loops present in North America seem to have little influence on system dynamics. Because the massive perturbations induced by masting events are major recurring challenges to an ecosystem, disentangling the causes of different system responses is likely to lead us to a better understanding of ecosystem function, resilience and stability.

Keywords

Ecosystem stability Nothofagus Predator satiation Pulsed resources Quercus Seed predation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank C.M. (Kim) King, Wendy Ruscoe, Ken Schmidt, and Louie Yang for their helpful comments. Support came from the N Z Foundation for Research, Science and Technology’s OBI ‘Ecosystems Resilience’ and the Royal Society of New Zealand’s Marsden Fund grant UOC0403 (DK), and from the National Science Foundation and the Integrated Hardwoods Range Management Program (WDK).

References

  1. Abrahamson WG, Layne JN (2002) Relation of ramet size to acorn production in five oak species of xeric upland habitats in south-central Florida. Am J Bot 89:124–131. doi: 10.3732/ajb.89.1.124 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abrams MD (1992) Fire and the development of oak forests. BioScience 42:346–353. doi: 10.2307/1311781 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alley JC, Berben PH, Dugdale JS, Fitzgerald BM, Knightbridge PI, Meads MH et al (2001) Responses of litter-dwelling arthropods and house mice to beech seeding in the Orongorongo Valley, New Zealand. J R Soc N Z 31:425–452Google Scholar
  4. Beggs JR (1999) Comparison of the quality of red and silver beech (Nothofagus) seeds in Nelson Lakes National Park, New Zealand. N Z J Bot 37:495–501Google Scholar
  5. Beggs JR, Wilson PR (1991) The Kaka Nestor meridionalis meridionalis, a New Zealand parrot endangered by introduced wasps and mammals. Biol Conserv 56:23–38. doi: 10.1016/0006-3207(91)90086-O CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blockstein DE (1998) Lyme disease and the passenger pigeon? Science 279:1831. doi: 10.1126/science.279.5358.1831c PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blockstein DE, Tordoff H (1985) Gone forever: a contemporary look at the extinction of the passenger pigeon. Am Birds 39:845–851Google Scholar
  8. Boutin S, Dhondt AA, Wauters LA, Tosi G, Humphries MM, McAdam A (2007) Anticipatory reproduction and population growth in seed predators feeding on pulsed resources. Science 314:1928–1930. doi: 10.1126/science.1135520 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brockerhoff EG, Kenis M (1997) Oviposition, life cycle, and parasitoids of the spruce cone maggot, Strobilomyia anthracian (Diptera: Anthomyiidae), in the Alps. Bull Entomol Res 87:555–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bucher EH (1992) The causes of extinction of the passenger pigeon. In: Power DM (ed) Current ornithology, vol 9. Plenum Press, New York, pp 1–36Google Scholar
  11. Campbell RW, Sloan RJ (1977) Natural regulation of innocuous gypsy moth populations. Environ Entomol 6:315–322Google Scholar
  12. Choquenot D, Ruscoe WA (2000) Mouse population eruptions in New Zealand forests: the role of population density and seedfall. J Anim Ecol 69:1058–1070. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2656.2000.00462.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Curran LM, Leighton M (2000) Vertebrate responses to spatiotemporal variation in seed production of mast-fruiting Dipterocarpaceae. Ecol Monogr 70:101–128Google Scholar
  14. Curran LM, Caniago I, Paoli BD, Astianti D, Kusneti M, Leighton M et al (1999) Impact of El Niño and logging on canopy tree recruitment in Borneo. Science 286:2184–2188. doi: 10.1126/science.286.5447.2184 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Diamond SJ, Giles RH (2000) Hard mast production before and after the chestnut blight. South J Appl For 24:196–201Google Scholar
  16. Dilks PJ, Williams M, Pryde M, Fraser I (2003) Large scale stoat control to protect mohua (Mohoua ochrocephala) and kaka (Nestor meridionalis) in the Eglinton Valley, Fiordland, New Zealand. N Z J Ecol 27:1–9Google Scholar
  17. Efford MG, Fitzgerald BM, Karl BJ, Berben PH (2006) Population dynamics of the ship rat Rattus rattus L. in the Orongorongo Valley, New Zealand. N Z J Ecol 33:273–297Google Scholar
  18. Elkinton JS, Liebhold AM (1990) Population dynamics of gypsy moth in North America. Annu Rev Entomol 35:571–596Google Scholar
  19. Elkinton JS, Healy WM, Buonaccorsi JP, Boettner GH, Hazzard A, Liebhold AM et al (1996) Interactions among gypsy moths, white-footed mice, and acorns. Ecology 77:2332–2342. doi: 10.2307/2265735 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Elliott GP (1996) Productivity and mortality of mohua (Mohoua ochrocephala). N Z J Zool 23:229–237Google Scholar
  21. Elliott GP, Dilks PJ, O’Donnell CFJ (1996) The ecology of yellow-crowned parakeets (Cyanoramphus auriceps) in Nothofagus forest in Fiordland, New Zealand. N Z J Zool 23:249–265Google Scholar
  22. Ellsworth JW, McComb BC (2003) Potential effects of passenger pigeon flocks on the structure and composition of presettlement forests of Eastern North America. Conserv Biol 17:1548–1558. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2003.00230.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fitzgerald BM, Daniel MJ, Fitzgerald AE, Karl BJ, Meads MJ, Notman PR (1996) Factors affecting the numbers of house mice (Mus musculus) in hard beech (Nothofagus truncata) forest. J R Soc N Z 26:237–249Google Scholar
  24. Fitzgerald BM, Efford MG, Karl BJ (2004) Breeding of house mice and the mast seeding of southern beeches in the Orongorongo Valley, New Zealand. N Z J Ecol 31:167–184Google Scholar
  25. Gansner DA, Herrick OW, DeBald PS, Acciavatti RE (1983) Changes in forest condition associated with gypsy moth. J For 81:155–157Google Scholar
  26. Gschwantner T, Hock G, Schopf A (2002) Impact of predators on artificially augmented populations of Lymantria dispar L. pupae (Lep., Lymantriidae). J Appl Entomol 126:66–73. doi: 10.1046/j.1439-0418.2002.00626.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Grimm V, Wissel C (1997) Babel, or the ecological stability discussions: an inventory and analysis of terminology and a guide for avoiding confusion. Oecologia 109:323–334. doi: 10.1007/s004420050090 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hogg AG, Higham TFG, Lowe DJ, Palmer JG, Reimer PJ, Newnham RM (2003) A wiggle-match date for Polynesian settlement of New Zealand. Antiquity 77:116–125Google Scholar
  29. Holling CS (1973) Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 4:1–23. doi: 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Holt RD (2008) Theoretical perspectives on resource pulses. Ecology 89:671–681. doi: 10.1890/07-0348.1 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jaksic FM, Lima M (2003) Myths and facts on ratadas: bamboo blooms, rainfall peaks and rodent outbreaks in South America. Aust Ecol 28:237–251. doi: 10.1046/j.1442-9993.2003.01271.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Janzen DH (1971) Seed predation by animals. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 2:465–492. doi: 10.1146/annurev.es.02.110171.002341 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Johnson DM, Liebhold AM, Bjørnstad ON, McManus ML (2005) Circumpolar variation in periodicity and synchrony among gypsy moth populations. J Anim Ecol 74:882–892. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2005.00980.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Johnson DM, Liebhold AM, Bjørnstad O (2006) Geographical variation in the periodicity of gypsy moth outbreaks. Ecography 29:367–374. doi: 10.1111/j.2006.0906-7590.04448.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jones CG, Ostfeld RS, Richard MP, Schauber EM, Wolff JO (1998) Chain reactions linking acorns to gypsy moth outbreaks and Lyme disease risk. Science 279:1023–1026. doi: 10.1126/science.279.5353.1023 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kelly D, Sork VL (2002) Mast seeding in perennial plants: why, how, where? Annu Rev Ecol Syst 33:427–447. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.33.020602.095433 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kelly D, Harrison AL, Lee WG, Payton IJ, Wilson PR, Schauber EM (2000) Predator satiation and extreme mast seeding in 11 species of Chionochloa (Poaceae). Oikos 90:477–488. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.900306.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kelly D, Hart DE, Allen RB (2001) Evaluating the wind-pollination benefits of mast seeding. Ecology 82:117–126Google Scholar
  39. Kelly D, Brindle C, Ladley JJ, Robertson AW, Maddigan FW, Butler J et al (2005) Can stoat (Mustela erminea) trapping increase bellbird (Anthornis melanura) populations and benefit mistletoe (Peraxilla tetrapetala) pollination? N Z J Ecol 29:69–82Google Scholar
  40. King CM (1982) Age structure and reproduction in feral New Zealand populations of the house mouse (Mus musculus), in relation to seedfall of southern beech. N Z J Ecol 9:467–479Google Scholar
  41. King CM (1983) The relationships between beech (Nothofagus sp.) seedfall and populations of mice (Mus musculus), and the demographic and dietary responses of stoats (Mustela erminea) in three New Zealand forests. J Anim Ecol 52:141–166. doi: 10.2307/4593 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. King CM (2002) Cohort variation in the life-history parameters of stoats Mustela erminea in relation to fluctuating food resources: a challenge to boreal ecologists. Acta Theriol (Warsz) 47:225–244Google Scholar
  43. King CM (2005) Handbook of New Zealand mammals, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  44. King CM, Moller H (1997) Distribution and response of rats Rattus rattus, R. exulans to seedfall in New Zealand beech forests. Pac Conserv Biol 3:143–155Google Scholar
  45. King CM, Powell RA (2007) The natural history of weasels and stoats: ecology, behavior, and management, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  46. King CM, Innes JG, Flux M, Kimberley MO, Leathwick JR, Williams DS (1996) Distribution and abundance of mammals in relation to habitat in Pureora Forest Park. N Z J Ecol 20:215–240Google Scholar
  47. King CM, White PCL, Purdey DC, Lawrence B (2003) Matching productivity to resource availability in a small predator, the stoat (Mustela erminea). Can J Zool 81:662–669. doi: 10.1139/z03-042 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Koenig WD, Benedict LS (2002) Size, insect parasitism, and energetic value of acorns stored by acorn woodpeckers. Condor 104:539–547. doi: 10.1650/0010-5422(2002)104[0539:SIPAEV]2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Koenig WD, Knops JMH (1997) Patterns of geographic synchrony in growth and reproduction of oaks within California and beyond. In: Pillsbury NH, Verner J, Tietje WD (eds) Proceedings of the Symposium on Oak Woodlands: ecology, management, and urban interface issues. Pacific SW Forest & Range Exp. Stn Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-160. San Luis Obispo, CA, pp 101–108Google Scholar
  50. Koenig WD, Knops JMH (2000) Patterns of annual seed production by northern hemisphere trees: a global perspective. Am Nat 155:59–69. doi: 10.1086/303302 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Koenig WD, Mumme RL, Carmen WJ, Stanback MT (1994) Acorn production by oaks in central coastal California: variation in and among years. Ecology 75:99–109. doi: 10.2307/1939386 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Koenig WD, Knops JMH, Carmen WJ, Stanback MT (1999) Spatial dynamics in the absence of dispersal: acorn production by oaks in central coastal California. Ecography 22:499–506Google Scholar
  53. Koenig WD, Kelly D, Sork VL, Duncan RP, Elkinton JS, Peltonen MS et al (2003) Dissecting components of population-level variation in seed production, and the evolution of masting. Oikos 102:581–591. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.12272.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Kolesik P, Sarfati M, Brockerhoff EG, Kelly D (2007) Description of Eucalyptodiplosis chionochloae sp. nov., a cecidomyiid feeding on inflorescences of Chionochloa (Poaceae) in New Zealand. N Z J Zool 34:107–115Google Scholar
  55. Lane RS, Quistad GB (1998) Borreliacidal factor in the blood of the western fence lizard (Sceloporus occidentalis). J Parasitol 84:29–34. doi: 10.2307/3284524 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Liebhold AM, Higashiura Y, Unno A (1998) Forest type affects predation on gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) pupae in Japan. Environ Entomol 27:858–862Google Scholar
  57. Liebhold AM, Elkinton JS, Williams D, Muzika R-M (2000) What causes outbreaks of the gypsy moth in North America? Popul Ecol 42:257–266. doi: 10.1007/PL00012004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Liebhold AM, Koenig WD, Bjørnstad O (2004) Spatial synchrony in population dynamics. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 35:467–490. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132516 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. McKone MJ, Thom AL, Kelly D, Cone AJ (2001) Phenology and identification of two flies (Chloropidae: Diplotoxa similis Cecidomyiidae: undescribed species) that feed in the inflorescences of Chionochloa pallens (Poaceae). N Z J Zool 28:89–101Google Scholar
  60. McShea WJ (2000) The influence of acorn crops on annual variation in rodent and bird populations within oak dominated forests. Ecology 81:228–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. McShea WJ, Schwede G (1993) Variable acorn crops: responses of white-tailed deer and other mast consumers. J Mammal 74:999–1006. doi: 10.2307/1382439 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. McWilliams WH, O’Brian GC, Reese GC, Waddell KL (2002) Distribution and abundance of oaks in North America. In: McShea WJ, Healy WM (eds) Oak forest ecosystems. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, pp 13–33Google Scholar
  63. Monks A, Kelly D (2006) Testing the resource matching hypothesis in the mast seeding tree Nothofagus truncata (Fagaceae). Aust Ecol 31:366–375. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9993.2006.01565.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Murphy EC, Dowding JE (1995) Ecology of the stoat in Nothofagus forest: home range, habitat use and diet at different stages of the beech mast cycle. N Z J Ecol 19:97–109Google Scholar
  65. Murua R, Gonzalez LA, Gonzalez M, Jofre YC (1996) Flowering effects of the shrub Chusquea quila Kunth (Poaceae) on demography of rodent populations of the temperate rain forest in southern Chile. Bol Soc Biol Concepcion 67:37–42Google Scholar
  66. Nakajima H (1992) Sensitivity and stability of flow networks. Ecol Model 62:123–133. doi: 10.1016/0304-3800(92)90085-S CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. O’Donnell CFJ (1996a) Monitoring mohua (yellowhead) populations in the South Island, New Zealand, 1983–1993. N Z J Zool 23:221–228Google Scholar
  68. O’Donnell CFJ (1996b) Predators and the decline of New Zealand forest birds: an introduction to the hole-nesting bird and predator programme. N Z J Zool 23:213–219Google Scholar
  69. O’Donnell CFJ, Dilks PJ, Elliott GP (1996) Control of a stoat (Mustela erminea) population irruption to enhance mohua (yellowhead) (Mohoua ochrocephala) breeding success in New Zealand. N Z J Zool 23:279–286Google Scholar
  70. Ostfeld RS, Keesing F (2000) Pulsed resources and community dynamics of consumers in terrestrial ecosystems. Trends Ecol Evol 15:232–237. doi: 10.1016/S0169-5347(00)01862-0 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Ostfeld RS, Lewin N, Schnurr J, Canham CD, Pickett STA (1994) The roles of small rodents in creating patchiness. Pol Ecol Stud 20:265–276Google Scholar
  72. Ostfeld RS, Jones CG, Wolff JO (1996) Of mice and mast: ecological connections in eastern deciduous forests. BioScience 46:323–330. doi: 10.2307/1312946 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Powell RA, King CM (1997) Variation in body size, sexual dimorphism and age-specific survival in stoats, Mustela erminea (Mammalia: Carnivora), with fluctuating food supplies. Biol J Linn Soc Lond 62:165–194. doi: 10.1006/bijl.1996.0154 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Pryde MA, O’Donnell CFJ, Barker RJ (2005) Factors influencing survival and long-term population viability of New Zealand long-tailed bats (Chalinolobus tuberculatus): implications for conservation. Biol Conserv 126:175–185. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2005.05.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Purdey DC, King CM, Lawrence B (2004) Age structure, dispersion and diet of a population of stoats (Mustela erminea) in southern Fiordland during the decline phase of the beechmast cycle. N Z J Zool 31:205–225Google Scholar
  76. Richardson SJ, Allen RB, Whitehead D, Carswell FE, Ruscoe WA, Platt KH (2005) Climate and net carbon availability determine temporal patterns of seed production by Nothofagus. Ecology 86:972–981. doi: 10.1890/04-0863 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Ruscoe WA, Choquenot D, Heyward R, Yockney I, Young N, Drew K (2003) Seed production, predators and house mouse population eruptions in New Zealand beech forests. In: Singleton GR, Hinds LA, Krebs CJ, Spratt DM (eds) Rats, mice and people: rodent biology and management. Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  78. Ruscoe WA, Elkinton JS, Choquenot D, Allen RB (2005) Predation of beech seed by mice: effects of numerical and functional responses. J Anim Ecol 74:1005–1019. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2005.00998.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Ruscoe WA, Norbury G, Choquenot D (2006) Trophic interactions among native and introduced animal species. In: Allen RB, Lee WG (eds) Biological invasions in New Zealand. Springer, Berlin, pp 247–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Satake A, Bjornstad ON, Kobro S (2004) Masting and tropic cascades: interplay between rowan trees, apple fruit moth, and their parasitoid in southern Norway. Oikos 104:540–550. doi: 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.12694.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Schauber EM, Kelly D, Turchin P, Simon C, Lee WG, Allen RB et al (2002) Synchronous and asynchronous masting by 18 New Zealand plant species: the role of temperature cues and implications for climate change. Ecology 83:1214–1225Google Scholar
  82. Schmidt KA, Ostfeld RS (2003) Songbird populations in fluctuating environments: nest predator responses to pulsed resources. Ecology 84:406–415. doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(2003)084[0406:SPIFEP]2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Schmidt KA, Ostfeld RS (2008) Numerical and behavioral effects within a pulse-driven system: consequences for direct and indirect interactions among shared prey. Ecology 89:635–646. doi: 10.1890/07-0199.1 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Schorger A (1955) The passenger pigeon. University of Wisconsin Press, MadisonGoogle Scholar
  85. Shimada T, Saitoh T (2006) Re-evaluation of the relationship between rodent populations and acorn masting: a review from the aspect of nutrients and defensive chemicals in acorns. Popul Ecol 48:341–352. doi: 10.1007/s10144-006-0012-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Silvertown JW (1980) The evolutionary ecology of mast seeding in trees. Biol J Linn Soc Lond 14:235–250. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1980.tb00107.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Sork VL, Bramble J, Sexton O (1993) Ecology of mast-fruiting in three species of North American deciduous oaks. Ecology 74:528–541. doi: 10.2307/1939313 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. van Nes EH, Scheffer M (2004) Large species shifts triggered by small forces. Am Nat 164:255–266. doi: 10.1086/422204 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Vandermast DB, Van Lear DH (2002) Riparian vegetation in the southern Appalachian mountains (USA) following chestnut blight. For Ecol Manage 155:97–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Wang G, Wolff JO, Vessey SH, Slade NA, Witham JW, Merritt JF, et al. Comparative population dynamics of Peromyscus leucopus in North America: influences of climate, food, and density dependence. Popul Ecol (in press). doi: 10.1007/s10144-008-0094-4
  91. Wardle JA (1984) The New Zealand beeches: ecology, utilization and management. New Zealand Forest Service, ChristchurchGoogle Scholar
  92. Watts WA (1979) Late Quaternary vegetation of the central Appalachian and New Jersey coastal plain. Ecol Monogr 49:427–469. doi: 10.2307/1942471 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. White PCL, King CM (2006) Predation on native birds in New Zealand beech forests: the role of functional relationships between stoats Mustela erminea and rodents. Ibis 148:765–771. doi: 10.1111/j.1474-919X.2006.00579.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. White TCR (2007) Mast seeding and mammal breeding: can a bonanza food supply be anticipated? N Z J Zool 34:179–183Google Scholar
  95. Wilmshurst JM, Anderson AJ, Higham TFG, Worthy TH (2008) Dating the late prehistoric dispersal of Polynesians to New Zealand using the commensal Pacific rat. Proc Natl Acad Sci 105:7676–7680PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Wilson PR, Karl BJ, Toft RJ, Beggs JR, Taylor RH (1998) The role of introduced predators and competitors in the decline of kaka (Nestor meridionalis) populations in New Zealand. Biol Conserv 83:175–185. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3207(97)00055-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Wittmer HU, Powell RA, King CM (2007) Understanding contributions of cohort effects to variation in population growth of fluctuating populations. J Anim Ecol 76:946–956. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2007.01274.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Wolff JO (1996) Population fluctuations of mast-eating rodents are correlated with production of acorns. J Mammal 77:850–856. doi: 10.2307/1382690 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Worthy TH, Holdaway RN (2002) The lost world of the moa. Indiana University Press, BloomingtonGoogle Scholar
  100. Yang LH, Bastow JL, Spence KO, Wright AN (2008) What can we learn from resource pulses? Ecology 89:621–634. doi: 10.1890/07-0175.1 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society of Population Ecology and Springer 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dave Kelly
    • 1
  • Walter D. Koenig
    • 2
    • 4
  • Andrew M. Liebhold
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Biological SciencesUniversity of CanterburyChristchurchNew Zealand
  2. 2.Hastings ReservationUniversity of California BerkeleyCarmel ValleyUSA
  3. 3.Northern Research StationMorgantownUSA
  4. 4.Laboratory of Ornithology and Department of Neurobiology and BehaviorCornell UniversityIthacaUSA

Personalised recommendations