Resource-dependent reproductive adjustment and the stability of consumer-resource dynamics
- 106 Downloads
This study explored a consumer-resource model including reproductive and nonreproductive subpopulations of the consumer to consider whether resource-dependent reproductive adjustment by the consumer would stabilize consumer-resource dynamics. The model assumed that decreasing (increasing) resource availability caused reproductive suppression (facilitation), and that the reproductive consumer had a higher mortality rate than the nonreproductive one (i.e., a trade-off between reproduction and survival). The model predicted that the variability would be reduced when the consumer had a strong tendency to suppress reproduction in response to low resource availability or when the cost of reproduction was high, although consumer extinction became more likely. Furthermore, when the consumer-resource dynamics converged to limit cycles, reproductive adjustment enhanced the long-term average of the consumer density. It was also predicted that if reproductive suppression enhanced resource consumption efficiency (i.e., a trade-off between reproduction and foraging), then it would destabilize the system by canceling the stabilizing effect of the reproductive adjustment itself. These results suggest that it is necessary not only to identify the costs of reproduction, but also to quantify the changes in individual-level performances due to reproduction in order to understand the ecological consequences of reproductive adjustment.
KeywordsBreeding suppression Phenotypic plasticity Population cycle Prey–predator interaction Reproductive strategy
We thank three anonymous referees for their valuable comments. This research was financially supported in part by the Global COE Program A06 to Kyoto University. TN was also supported by a Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Research Fellowship for Young Scientists (1702360).
- Caswell H (1989) Matrix population models: construction, analysis, and interpretation. Sinauer, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
- Clutton-Brock TH (1988) Reproductive success. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
- Clutton-Brock TH, Guiness FE, Albon SD (1982) Red deer: behavior and ecology of two sexes. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
- De Neve L, Soler JJ, Soler M, Pérez-Contreras T, Martín-Vivaldi M, Martínez JG (2004) Effects of a food supplementation experiment on reproductive investment and a post-mating sexually selected trait in magpies Pica pica. J Avian Biol 35:246–251. doi: 10.1111/j.0908-8857.2004.03162.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Klemetsen A, Amundsen PA, Dempson JB, Jonsson B, Jonsson N, O’Connell MF, Mortensen E (2003) Atlantic salmon Salmo salar L., brown trout Salmo trutta L. and Arctic charr Salvelinus alpinus (L.): a review of aspects of their life histories. Ecol Freshw Fish 12:1–59. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0633.2003.00010.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Murdoch WW, Briggs CJ, Nisbet RM (2003) Consumer-resource dynamics. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
- Ohgushi T (1998) Bottom-up population regulation of a herbivorous lady beetle: an evolutionary perspective. In: Dempster JP, McLean IFG (eds) Insect populations in theory and in practice. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 367–390Google Scholar
- Ohgushi T, Craig TP, Price PW (2007) Ecological communities: plant mediation in indirect interaction webs. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- de Roos AM (1997) A gentle introduction to physiologically structured population models. In: Tuljapurkar S, Caswell H (eds) Structured-population models in marine, terrestrial, and freshwater systems. Chapman & Hall, New York, pp 119–204Google Scholar
- Stearns SC (1992) The evolution of life histories. University of Oxford Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar