Population Ecology

, Volume 49, Issue 3, pp 191–200

Robustness and uncertainty in estimates of butterfly abundance from transect counts

  • Kevin Gross
  • Eric J. Kalendra
  • Brian R. Hudgens
  • Nick M. Haddad
Original Article


Many butterfly populations are monitored by counting the number of butterflies observed while walking transects during the butterfly’s flight season. Methods for estimating population abundance from these transect counts are appealing because they allow rare populations to be monitored without capture–recapture studies that could harm fragile individuals. An increasingly popular method for estimating abundance from transect counts relies on strong assumptions about the counting process and the processes that govern butterfly population dynamics. Here, we study the statistical performance of this method when underlying model assumptions are violated. We find that estimates of population size are robust to departures from underlying model assumptions, but that the uncertainty in these estimates (i.e., confidence intervals) is substantially underestimated. Alternative bootstrap and Bayesian methods provide better measures of the uncertainty in estimated population size, but are conditional upon knowledge of butterfly detectability. Because of these requirements, a mixed approach that combines data from small capture–recapture studies with transect counts strikes the best balance between accurate monitoring and minimal injury to individuals. Our study is motivated by monitoring studies for St. Francis satyr (Neonympha mitchelli francisci), a rare and relatively immobile butterfly occurring only in the sandhills region of south-central North Carolina, USA.


Abundance Bayesian statistics Estimation Parametric bootstrap Population monitoring 


  1. Boughton DA (2000) The dispersal system of a butterfly: a test of source–sink theory suggests the intermediate-scale hypothesis. Am Nat 156:131–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brown JA, Boyce MS (1998) Line transect sampling of Karner blue butterflies (Lycaeides melissa samuelis). Env Ecol Stat 5:81–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Buckland ST, Anderson DR, Burnham KP, Laake JL, Borchers DL, Thomas L (2001) Introduction to distance sampling—estimating abundance of biological populations. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  4. Efron B, Tibshirani RJ (1993) An introduction to the bootstrap. Chapman & Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. Gelman A, Rubin DB (1992) Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences. Stat Sci 7:457–511Google Scholar
  6. Haddad NM, Kuefler D, Hudgens BR (2005) Monitoring protocal for St. Francis’ satyr: final report for the 2004 field season. Report to the Department of Defense. NC State University, Raleigh, NCGoogle Scholar
  7. Manly BFJ (1974) Estimation of stage-specific survival rates and other parameters for insect populations developing through several stages. Oecologia 15:277–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Mattoni R, Longcore T, Zonneveld C, Novotny V (2001) Analysis of transect counts to monitor population size in endangered insects. J Insect Conserv 5:197–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. McCullach P, Nelder JA (1989) Generalized linear models, 2nd edn. Chapman & Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. Murphy DD (1988) Are we studying our endangered butterflies to death? J Res Lep 26:236–239Google Scholar
  11. Parshall DK, Kral TW (1989) A new subspecies of Neonympha mitchelli (French) (Satyridae) from North Carolina. J Lep Soc 43:114–119Google Scholar
  12. Pollard E (1977) A method for assessing change in the abundance of butterflies. Biol Conserv 12:115–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Pollard E, Yates TJ (1993) Monitoring butterflies for ecology and conservation. Chapman & Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  14. Pollard E, Elias DO, Skelton MJ, Thomas JA (1975) A method of assessing the abundance of butterflies in Monks wood national nature reserve in 1973. Entomol Gaz 26:79–88Google Scholar
  15. Pollock KH, Nichols JD, Simons TR, Farnsworth GL, Bailey LL, Sauer JR (2002) Large scale wildlife monitoring studies: statistical methods for design and analysis. Environmetrics 13:105–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Rothery P, Roy DB (2001) Application of generalized additive models to butterfly transect count data. J Appl Stat 28:897–909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Singer MC, Wedlake P (1981) Capture does affect probability of recapture in a butterfly species. Ecol Entomol 6:215–216Google Scholar
  18. Thomas JA (1983) A quick method for estimating butterfly numbers during surveys. Biol Conserv 27:195–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Thomas JA (2005) Monitoring change in the abundance and distribution of insects using butterflies and other indicator groups. Philos Trans R Soc B 360:357Google Scholar
  20. Wedderburn RWM (1974) Quasi-likelihood functions, generalized linear models and the Gauss–Newton method. Biometrika 61:439–447Google Scholar
  21. Zonneveld C (1991) Estimating death rates from transect counts. Ecol Entomol 16:115–121Google Scholar
  22. Zonneveld C, Longcore T, Mulder C (2003) Optimal schemes to detect the presence of insect species. Conserv Biol 17:476–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society of Population Ecology and Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kevin Gross
    • 1
    • 3
  • Eric J. Kalendra
    • 1
  • Brian R. Hudgens
    • 2
  • Nick M. Haddad
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of StatisticsNorth Carolina State UniversityRaleighUSA
  2. 2.Department of ZoologyNorth Carolina State UniversityRaleighUSA
  3. 3.Biomathematics ProgramNorth Carolina State UniversityRaleighUSA

Personalised recommendations