Population Ecology

, Volume 49, Issue 2, pp 89–100 | Cite as

Unifying and distinguishing diversity ordering methods for comparing communities

  • Canran Liu
  • Robert J. Whittaker
  • Keping Ma
  • Jay R. Malcolm
Forum

Abstract

Diversity indices have been widely used in ecological research, but they remain problematic in that different indices may rank communities inconsistently. This problem can be solved by using diversity ordering methods, the output of which is a diversity profile in graphical form for each community being compared. In this paper, we demonstrate that existing diversity ordering methods can be classified into four groups and that within-group methods are essentially equivalent, while among-group methods are not. We find that the intrinsic diversity-related methods—i.e., the group containing the right tail-sum method, the logarithmic dominance plot, the majorization method, and the k-dominance plot—provide the most stringent test of diversity ordering, and we recommend the right tail-sum method as the method of preference for practical purposes.

Keywords

Diversity indices Diversity profile Intrinsic diversity Right tail-sum method Species-abundance distributions 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was partly funded by the 973 Project (G2000046802) from China. C. Liu is supported by University of New England Vice Chancellor’s postdoctoral fellowship. This paper has benefitted considerably from suggestions offered by R. K. Colwell, M. O. Hill, B. Tóthmérész, and M. Williamson.

References

  1. Bailey RG (1978a) Observations on the zooplankton and littoral macroinvertebrates of Nyumba ya Mungu reservoir, Tanzania. Biol J Linn Soc 10:93–107Google Scholar
  2. Bailey RG (1978b) The ecology of the fishes in Nyumba ya Mungu reservoir, Tanzania. Biol J Linn Soc 10:109–137Google Scholar
  3. Chabreck RH, Palmisano AW (1973) The effects of Hurricane Camille on the marshes of the Mississippi River Delta. Ecology 54:1118–1123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chapman WMM (1939) The bird population on an Oxfordshire farm. J Anim Ecol 8:286–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Colwell RK, Mao CX, Chang J (2004) Interpolating, extrapolating, and comparing incidence-based species accumulation curves. Ecology 85:2717–2727Google Scholar
  6. Daróczy Z (1970) Generalized information functions. Inform Contr 16:36–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. David L (1939) Further changes in the Breckland avifauna caused by afforestation. J Anim Ecol 8:277–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Di Battista T, Gattone SA (2004) Simultaneous inference on diversity of biological communities. Stat Methods Appl 13:129–136Google Scholar
  9. Dun ER (1949) Relative abundance of some Panamanian snakes. Ecology 30:39–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fattorini L, Marcheselli M (1999) Inference on intrinsic diversity profiles of biological populations. Environmentrics 10:589–599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fleming TH, Hooper ET, Wilson DE (1972) Three central American bat communities: structure, reproductive cycles, and movement patterns. Ecology 53:553–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gotelli N, Colwell RK (2001) Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecol Lett 4:379–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gove JH, Patil GP, Taillie C (1995) A mathematical programming model for maintaining structural diversity in uneven-aged forest stands with implications to other formulations. Ecol Model 79:11–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hara K (1987) A Characterization of plant communities as habitats for climbing plants. Ecol Rev 21:55–66Google Scholar
  15. Hawkins CP, Murphy ML, Anderson NH (1982) Effects of canopy, substrate composition, and gradient on the structure of macroinvertebrate communities in Cascade Range streams of Oregon. Ecology 63:1840–1856CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hill MO (1973) Diversity and evenness: a unifying notation and its consequences. Ecology 54:427–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hirabuki Y (1988) Significance of viable seeds of several woody pioneers stored in the soil of a temperate mixed forest. Ecol Rev 21:163–168Google Scholar
  18. Hulbert SH (1971) The non-concept of species diversity: a critique and alternative parameters. Ecology 52:577–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hussain F, Ilyas M, Takatsuki S (1997) Plant communities of Girbanr Hills, Swat District, Northwestern Pakistan. Ecol Rev 23:247–260Google Scholar
  20. Janzen DH (1973) Sweep samples of tropical foliage insects: description of study sites, with data on species abundances and size distributions. Ecology 54:659–686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kandall MA, Aschan M (1993) Latitudinal gradients in the structure of macrobenthic communities: a comparison of Arctic, temperate and tropical sites. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 172:157–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kang SJ, Hibino K, Iizumi S (1984) A survey of trees of the residential districts of Seoul and Cheongju, Korea. Ecol Rev 20:189–203Google Scholar
  23. Kang SJ, Hibino K, Iizumi S (1985) A comparative study on tree flora of the residential districts in Sendai, Japan and Daejeon, Korea. Ecol Rev 20:263–278Google Scholar
  24. Kempton RA (1979) The structure of species abundance and measurement of diversity. Biometrics 35:307–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kempton RA (2002) Species diversity. In: El-Shaarawi AH, Piegorsch WW (eds) Encyclopedia of environmentrics. Wiley, Chichester, pp 2086–2092Google Scholar
  26. Kikuchi T, Tsuda S, Fujita H, Takahashi M (1987) Aboveground phytomass of post-fire vegetation in the second year at three locations of Honshu Island, Japan. Ecol Rev 21:93–98Google Scholar
  27. Lack D, Venables LSV (1939) The habitat distribution of British woodland birds. J Anim Ecol 8:39–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lewis CE, Swindel BF, Tanner GW (1988) Species diversity and diversity profiles: concept, measurement, and application to timer and range management. J Range Manage 41:466–469Google Scholar
  29. Lussenhop J (1973) The soil arthropod community of a Chicago expressway margin. Ecology 54:1123–1137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Magurran AE (1988) Ecological diversity and its measurement. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  31. Magurran AE (2004) Measuring biological diversity. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  32. Mochida Y, Yamanaka M, Tsuda S, Melana EE, Mapalo AM, Bagalihog SD, Kikuchi T (1994) A phytosociological description of the mangrove forests on Kosrae Island, Micronesia, and Bohol Island, the Philippines. Ecol Rev 23:67–76Google Scholar
  33. Molles MC Jr (1978) Fish species diversity on model and natural reef patches: experimental insular biogeography. Ecol Monogr 48:289–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mosler K (2001) Multidimensional indices and orders of diversity. Community Ecol 2:137–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Patil GP (2002) Diversity profiles. In: El-Shaarawi AH, Piegorsch WW (eds) Encyclopedia of environmentrics. Wiley, Chichester, pp 555–561Google Scholar
  36. Patil GP, Taillie C (1979) An overview of diversity. In: Grassle JF, Patil GP, Smith W, Taillie C (eds) Ecological diversity in theory and practice. International Cooperative Publ House, Fairland, pp 3–27Google Scholar
  37. Patil GP, Taillie C (1982) Diversity as a concept and its measurement. J Am Stat Assoc 77:548–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pearson TH (1975) The benthic ecology of Loch Linnhe and Loch Eil, a sea-loch system on the west coast of Scotland. IV. Changes in the benthic fauna attributable to organic enrichment. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 20:1–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ricotta C, Pacini A, Giancarlo A (2002) Parametric scaling from species to growth-form diversity: an interesting analogy with multifractal functions. Biosystems 65:179–186PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ricotta C, Giancarlo A, Alessandro C (2003) An index of divergence from species to life-form diversity based on the notion of intrinsic diversity ordering. Plant Ecol 165:217–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Robertson AG (1939) The nocturnal activity of crane-flies (Tipilinae) as indicated by captures in a light trap at Rothamsted. J Anim Ecol 8:300–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rousseau R, Van Hecke P, Nijssen D, Bogaert J (1999) The relationship between diversity profiles, evenness and species richness based on partial ordering. Environ Ecol Stat 6:211–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sato M, Miura O (1996) The vegetational change in the Suiren-Numa Mire during the half century caused by human disturbances. Ecol Rev 23:223–232Google Scholar
  44. Shaw KM, Lamshead PJD, Platt HM (1983) Detection of pollution-induced disturbance in marine benthic assemblages with special reference to nematodes. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 11:195–202Google Scholar
  45. Smith W, Grassle FJ (1977) Sampling properties of a family of diversity measures. Biometrics 33:283–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Solomon DL (1979) A comparative approach to species diversity. In: Grassle JF, Patil GP, Smith W and Taillie C (eds) Ecological diversity in theory and practice. International Cooperative Publ House, Fairland, pp 29–35Google Scholar
  47. Solomon DS, Gove JH (1999) Effects of uneven-age management intensity on structural diversity in two major forest types in New England. For Ecol Manage 114:265–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Taillie C (1979) Species equitability: a comparative approach. In: Grassle JF, Patil GP, Smith W, Taillie C (eds) Ecological diversity in theory and practice. International Cooperative Publ House, Fairland, pp 51–61Google Scholar
  49. Takatsuki S (1980) Ecological studies on effect of Sika deer (Cervus Nippon) on vegetation II. The vegetation of Akune Island, Kagoshima Prefecture, with special reference to grazing and browsing effect of Sika deer. Ecol Rev 19:123–144Google Scholar
  50. Takehara A (1989) Flowering size, flowering age and sex ratio of willow populations along the Hirose River, northeast Japan. Ecol Rev 21:265–275Google Scholar
  51. Tóthmérész B (1995) Comparison of different methods for diversity ordering. J Veg Sci 6:283–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tong YL (1983) Some distribution properties of the sample species – diversity indexes and their applications. Biometrics 39:999–1008Google Scholar
  53. Tsallis C (2002) Entropic nonextensivity: a possible measure of complexity. Chaos Soliton Fract 13:371–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Tsuda S (1985) Post-fire vegetation compared with cut-over on the subalpine zone in Okuchichibu, central Japan. Ecol Rev 20:285–290Google Scholar
  55. Whittaker RJ, Willis KJ, Field R (2001) Scale and species richness: towards a general, hierarchical theory of species diversity. J Biogeogr 28:453–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wiegert RG (1974) Litterbag studies of microarthropod populations in three South Carolina old fields. Ecology 55:94–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Yoshida S, Suzuki T, Kim JH, Kurihara Y (1989) Community of soil microarthropods in a reclaimed land of western Korea. Ecol Rev 21:259–264Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society of Population Ecology and Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Canran Liu
    • 1
  • Robert J. Whittaker
    • 2
  • Keping Ma
    • 3
  • Jay R. Malcolm
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Ecosystem Management, School of Environmental Sciences and Natural Resources ManagementUniversity of New EnglandArmidaleAustralia
  2. 2.Biodiversity Research Group, School of Geography, Oxford University Centre for the EnvironmentUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
  3. 3.Laboratory of Quantitative Vegetation Ecology, Institute of BotanyChinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  4. 4.Faculty of ForestryUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations