Population Ecology

, Volume 48, Issue 4, pp 297–305 | Cite as

Biological control: lessons from a study of California red scale

  • William W. Murdoch
  • Susan L. Swarbrick
  • Cherie J. Briggs
Review Special feature: biological control: theory and practice


A 20-year study of suppression of California red scale, a world-wide pest of citrus, by the parasitoid Aphytismelinus has established that the interaction is dynamically stable and that the mechanisms leading to control and stability operate at a local scale: spatial processes are not important. Key features appear to be an invulnerable class in the pest and rapid development of the parasitoid compared with the pest, as well as the fact that the parasitoid is an in situ specialist on the pest. Although another parasitoid species and two predator species are also present, they play at most a negligible role in pest control. These features—long-term persistence, suppression by a single natural enemy, an invulnerable stage in the pest and rapid development in the natural enemy—appear to be common in other coccid pest systems. By contrast, in temporary crops where the pest and enemy populations are open (i.e., sustained over the long run mainly by immigration) and non-persistent locally, as is frequently found in aphid pests, we expect that multiple generalist enemies are required for control and, of course, that spatial processes are important. There are very few well-studied examples of such systems, but these support our expectations. In these cases, it also appears that neither rapid enemy development nor an invulnerable pest stage is important for successful control.


Parasitoids Predators Population regulation Insect pests Invulnerable stages Development times 


  1. Cardinale BJ, Harvey CT, Gross K, Ives AR (2003) Biodiversity and biocontrol: emergent impacts of a multi-enemy assemblage on pest suppression and crop yield in an agroecosystem. Ecol Lett 6:857–865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Clausen CP (1978) Introduced parasites and predators of arthropod pests and weeds: a world review, agricultural handbook no. 480. Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  3. Collier TR, Murdoch WW, Nisbet RM (1994) Egg load and the decision to host-feed in the parasitoid, Aphytis melinus. J Anim Ecol 63:299–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Crowley PH (1981) Dispersal and the stability of predator–prey interactions. Am Nat 118:673–701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. deBach P, Rosen D, Kennett CE (1971) Biological control of coccids by introduced natural enemies. In: Huffaker CB (eds) Biological control. Plenum Press, New York, pp 165–194Google Scholar
  6. Dixon AFG (2000) Insect predator–prey dynamics: ladybird beetles and biological control. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  7. Ehler LE, Miller JC (1978) Biological control in temporary agroecosystems. Entomophaga 23:207–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Huffaker CB (1971) Biological control. Plenum Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Ives AR, Settle WH (1997) Metapopulation dynamics and pest control in agricultural systems. Am Nat 149:220–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Murdoch WW, Briggs CJ, Nisbet RM (1996a) Competitive displacement and biological control in parasitoids: a model. Am Nat 148:807–826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Murdoch WW, Briggs CJ, Nisbet RM (2003) Consumer-resource dynamics: monographs in population biology. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
  12. Murdoch WW, Briggs CJ, Swarbrick S (2005) Host suppression and stability in a parasitoid-host system: experimental demonstration. Science 309:610–613PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Murdoch WW, Chesson J, Chesson PL (1985) Biological control in theory and practice. Am Nat 125:344–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Murdoch WW, Luck RF, Swarbrick SL, Walde S, Yu DS, Reeve JD (1995) Regulation of an insect population under biological control. Ecology 76:206–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Murdoch WW, Nisbet RM, Gurney WSC, Reeve JD (1987) An invulnerable age class and stability in delay-differential parasitoid-host models. Am Nat 129:263–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Murdoch WW, Nisbet RM, Luck RF, Godfray HJC, Gurney WSC (1992) Size-selective sex-allocation and host feeding in a parasitoid-host model. J Anim Ecol 61:533–541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Murdoch WW, Oaten A (1975) Predation and population stability. Adv Ecol Res 9:1–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Murdoch WW, Swarbrick SL, Luck RF, Walde S, Yu DS (1996b) Refuge dynamics and metapopulation dynamics: an experimental test. Am Nat 147:424–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Niemczyk E, Dixon AFG (1988) Ecology and effectiveness of aphidophaga. SPB Academic Publishing, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  20. Reeve JD (1988) Environmental variability, migration, and persistence in host-parasitoid systems. Am Nat 132:810–836CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rosenheim JA, Kaya HK, Ehler LE, Marois JJ, Jaffee BA (1995) Intraguild predation among biological-control agents: theory and evidence. Biol Control 5:303–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Schellhorn NA, Andow DA (1999) Cannibalism and interspecific predation: role of oviposition behavior. Ecol Appl 9:418–428Google Scholar
  23. Snyder WE, Ives AR (2003) Interactions between specialist and generalist natural enemies: parasitoids, predators, and pea aphid biocontrol. Ecology 84:91–107Google Scholar
  24. Tremblay E, Pennacchio F (1988) Population trends of key aphids and their main natural enemies in an alfalfa ecosystem in southern Italy. In: Niemczyk E, Dixon AFG (eds) Ecology and effectiveness of aphidophaga. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague, pp 261–265Google Scholar
  25. Walde SJ (1991) Patch dynamics of a phytophagous mite population: effect of number of subpopulations. Ecology 72:1591–1598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Walde SJ (1994) Immigration and the dynamics of a predator–prey interaction in biological control. J Anim Ecol 63:337–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Walde SJ, Nachman GN (1999) Dynamics of spatially structured mite populations. In: Hawkins BA, Cornell HV (eds) Theoretical approaches to biological control. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 163–189Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society of Population Ecology and Springer-Verlag Tokyo 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • William W. Murdoch
    • 1
  • Susan L. Swarbrick
    • 1
  • Cherie J. Briggs
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Ecology, Evolution and Marine BiologyUniversity of CaliforniaSanta BarbaraUSA
  2. 2.Department of Integrative BiologyUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations