A prediction of postoperative neurological deficits following intracranial aneurysm surgery using somatosensory evoked potential deterioration duration
- 49 Downloads
Although the application of somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) in intracranial aneurysm surgery has been well demonstrated, the relationship between the duration of SSEP deterioration and postoperative neurological deficits (PNDs) is still not clear. The objectives of this study were (1) to detect the relationship between the SSEP deterioration duration and PND; and (2) detect the relationship between SSEP deterioration duration and postoperative computed tomography (CT) findings. Data from 587 patients were reviewed and 40 patients with SSEP deterioration were enrolled. Four patients presented irreversible disappearance and 36 patients presented reversible deterioration (including 9 [25%] patients with reversible reduction and 27 [75%] patients with reversible disappearance). In the patients with reversible SSEP deterioration, 17 patients had PNDs, and the SSEP deterioration duration was 42 ± 46 min, ranging from 5 to 180 min. Nineteen patients did not have PNDs, and their duration of SSEP deterioration was 11 ± 9 min (range 2–40 min). The SSEP deterioration duration significantly differed between patients with or without PND (P < 0.01). Eleven minutes is the optimal cut-off value of motor evoked potential change duration avoiding PND (area under the curve = 0.84). Patients with a SSEP deteriorating duration > 11 min had a significant higher incidence rate of abnormal CT finding postoperatively (p < 0.05). According to these results, we conclude that the duration of SSEP deterioration is extremely important to postoperative neurological function, and in order to avoid PND, the SSEP deterioration duration must not exceed 10 min. The SSEP deterioration duration is also associated with postoperative CT findings.
KeywordsAneurysm SSEP monitoring Duration of SSEP deterioration Intraoperative monitoring Postoperative neurological deficit
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
The current study was approved by the ethical committee of our hospital.
Informed consent was obtained for all enrolled patients.
- 5.Ducati A, Landi A, Cenzato M, Fava E, Rampini P, Giovanelli M, Villani R (1988) Monitoring of brain function by means of evoked potentials in cerebral aneurysm surgery. Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien) 42:8–13Google Scholar
- 11.Mizoi K, Yoshimoto T (1993) Permissible temporary occlusion time in aneurysm surgery as evaluated by evoked potential monitoring. Neurosurgery 33:434–440 discussion 440Google Scholar
- 12.Nash CL, Jr., Lorig RA, Schatzinger LA, Brown RH (1977) Spinal cord monitoring during operative treatment of the spine. Clin Orthop Relat Res NA 126:100–105Google Scholar
- 14.Samson D, Batjer HH, Bowman G, Mootz L, Krippner WJ Jr, Meyer YJ, Allen BC (1994) A clinical study of the parameters and effects of temporary arterial occlusion in the management of intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery 34:22–28 discussion 28-29Google Scholar
- 16.Symon L (1980) The relationship between CBF, evoked potentials and the clinical features in cerebral ischaemia. Acta Neurol Scand Suppl 78:175–190Google Scholar