Predictive markers for MGMT promoter methylation in glioblastomas
- 66 Downloads
The promoter methylation status of the O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) gene has been described as the most important predictor of chemotherapeutic response and patients’ survival in glioblastomas (GBs). Therefore, prediction of the MGMT promoter methylation status by imaging would help to preoperatively decide the overall treatment strategy as well as surgical strategy. This study aimed to detect imaging parameters to predict MGMT promoter methylation in GBs by using a commercially available software. We investigated three imaging features (ring enhancement, tumor location, and laterality) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) parameters in 48 newly diagnosed GBs treated at Keio University Hospital in 2006 or later. For ADC, texture analyses were performed. Regions of interest (ROIs) were drawn manually with reference to contrast-enhanced areas, excluding necrotic and cystic regions. Mean ADC value and ADC histogram parameters, including kurtosis, skewness, and entropy, were compared with MGMT promoter methylation. Each parameter was evaluated to determine correlation with MGMT promoter methylation, and the parameters with significant associations with the methylation status were correlated with the MGMT-positive cell ratio determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) analysis. The mean ADC value and ADC entropy were significantly associated with MGMT promoter methylation. The combination of mean ADC value and ADC entropy predicted MGMT promoter methylation, with a PPV of 81.2% and specificity of 88.9%. The mean ADC value and ADC entropy were negatively correlated with the MGMT-positive cell ratio in the IHC analysis. This study demonstrated that texture analyses of ADC histograms in GBs were predictive of MGMT promoter methylation.
KeywordsGlioblastoma Texture analysis ADC MGMT
We greatly thank Ms. Naoko Tsuzaki at the Department of Neurosurgery, Keio University School of Medicine for technical assistance of laboratory works. The authors also greatly thank Dr. Takayuki Abe at the Center for Clinical Research, Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Keio University School of Medicine for statistical advice.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Keio University. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 2.Ashby LS, Smith KA, Stea B (2016) Gliadel wafer implantation combined with standard radiotherapy and concurrent followed by adjuvant temozolomide for treatment of newly diagnosed high-grade glioma: a systematic literature review. World J Surg Oncol 14:225. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-016-0975-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Barajas RF Jr, Hodgson JG, Chang JS, Vandenberg SR, Yeh RF, Parsa AT, McDermott MW, Berger MS, Dillon WP, Cha S (2010) Glioblastoma multiforme regional genetic and cellular expression patterns: influence on anatomic and physiologic MR imaging. Radiology 254:564–576. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.09090663 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Drabycz S, Roldan G, de Robles P, Adler D, McIntyre JB, Magliocco AM, Cairncross JG, Mitchell JR (2010) An analysis of image texture, tumor location, and MGMT promoter methylation in glioblastoma using magnetic resonance imaging. NeuroImage 49:1398–1405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.09.049 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Dunn J, Baborie A, Alam F, Joyce K, Moxham M, Sibson R, Crooks D, Husband D, Shenoy A, Brodbelt A, Wong H, Liloglou T, Haylock B, Walker C (2009) Extent of MGMT promoter methylation correlates with outcome in glioblastomas given temozolomide and radiotherapy. Br J Cancer 101:124–131. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605127 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Ellingson BM, Cloughesy TF, Pope WB, Zaw TM, Phillips H, Lalezari S, Nghiemphu PL, Ibrahim H, Naeini KM, Harris RJ, Lai A (2012) Anatomic localization of O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylated and unmethylated tumors: a radiographic study in 358 de novo human glioblastomas. NeuroImage 59:908–916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.076 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Eoli M, Menghi F, Bruzzone MG, De Simone T, Valletta L, Pollo B, Bissola L, Silvani A, Bianchessi D, D'Incerti L, Filippini G, Broggi G, Boiardi A, Finocchiaro G (2007) Methylation of O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase and loss of heterozygosity on 19q and/or 17p are overlapping features of secondary glioblastomas with prolonged survival. Clin Cancer Res 13:2606–2613. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-2184 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Fukushima T, Takeshima H, Kataoka H (2009) Anti-glioma therapy with temozolomide and status of the DNA-repair gene MGMT. Anticancer Res 29:4845–4854Google Scholar
- 16.Gupta A, Prager A, Young RJ, Shi W, Omuro AM, Graber JJ (2013) Diffusion-weighted MR imaging and MGMT methylation status in glioblastoma: a reappraisal of the role of preoperative quantitative ADC measurements. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 34:E10–E11. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A3467 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Han Y, Yan LF, Wang XB, Sun YZ, Zhang X, Liu ZC, Nan HY, Hu YC, Yang Y, Zhang J, Yu Y, Sun Q, Tian Q, Hu B, Xiao G, Wang W, Cui GB (2018) Structural and advanced imaging in predicting MGMT promoter methylation of primary glioblastoma: a region of interest based analysis. BMC Cancer 18:215. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4114-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Hegi ME, Diserens AC, Godard S, Dietrich PY, Regli L, Ostermann S, Otten P, Van Melle G, de Tribolet N, Stupp R (2004) Clinical trial substantiates the predictive value of O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase promoter methylation in glioblastoma patients treated with temozolomide. Clin Cancer Res 10:1871–1874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Hegi ME, Diserens AC, Gorlia T, Hamou MF, de Tribolet N, Weller M, Kros JM, Hainfellner JA, Mason W, Mariani L, Bromberg JE, Hau P, Mirimanoff RO, Cairncross JG, Janzer RC, Stupp R (2005) MGMT gene silencing and benefit from temozolomide in glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 352:997–1003. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa043331 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Hsu CY, Lin SC, Ho HL, Chang-Chien YC, Hsu SP, Yen YS, Chen MH, Guo WY, Ho DM (2013) Exclusion of histiocytes/endothelial cells and using endothelial cells as internal reference are crucial for interpretation of MGMT immunohistochemistry in glioblastoma. Am J Surg Pathol 37:264–271. https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0b013e318267b061 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Kanazawa T, Fujiwara H, Takahashi H, Nishiyama Y, Hirose Y, Tanaka S, Yoshida K, Sasaki H (2018) Imaging scoring systems for preoperative molecular diagnoses of lower-grade gliomas. Neurosurg Rev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-018-0981-x
- 23.Kickingereder P, Bonekamp D, Nowosielski M, Kratz A, Sill M, Burth S, Wick A, Eidel O, Schlemmer HP, Radbruch A, Debus J, Herold-Mende C, Unterberg A, Jones D, Pfister S, Wick W, von Deimling A, Bendszus M, Capper D (2016) Radiogenomics of glioblastoma: machine learning-based classification of molecular characteristics by using multiparametric and multiregional MR imaging features. Radiology 281:907–918. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2016161382 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Kleihues P, Cavanee W (2000) Pathology and genetics of tumors of the nervous system. International Agency for Research on Cancer Press, LyonGoogle Scholar
- 27.Lechapt-Zalcman E, Levallet G, Dugue AE, Vital A, Diebold MD, Menei P, Colin P, Peruzzy P, Emery E, Bernaudin M, Chapon F, Guillamo JS (2012) O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation and low MGMT-encoded protein expression as prognostic markers in glioblastoma patients treated with biodegradable carmustine wafer implants after initial surgery followed by radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide. Cancer 118:4545–4554. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.27441 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, Cavenee WK (2007) WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system, 4th edn. International Agency for Research on Cancer, LyonGoogle Scholar
- 29.Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, Cavenee WK, Ellison DW, Figarella-Branger D, Perry A, Reifenberger G, von Deimling A (2016) WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system. In: Revised 4th edn. International Agency for Research on Cancer, LyonGoogle Scholar
- 33.Ostrom QT, Gittleman H, Fulop J, Liu M, Blanda R, Kromer C, Wolinsky Y, Kruchko C, Barnholtz-Sloan JS (2015) CBTRUS statistical report: primary brain and central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2008-2012. Neuro-Oncology 17(Suppl 4):iv1–iv62. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/nov189 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 34.Pope WB, Lai A, Mehta R, Kim HJ, Qiao J, Young JR, Xue X, Goldin J, Brown MS, Nghiemphu PL, Tran A, Cloughesy TF (2011) Apparent diffusion coefficient histogram analysis stratifies progression-free survival in newly diagnosed bevacizumab-treated glioblastoma. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 32:882–889. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A2385 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 37.Romano A, Calabria LF, Tavanti F, Minniti G, Rossi-Espagnet MC, Coppola V, Pugliese S, Guida D, Francione G, Colonnese C, Fantozzi LM, Bozzao A (2013) Apparent diffusion coefficient obtained by magnetic resonance imaging as a prognostic marker in glioblastomas: correlation with MGMT promoter methylation status. Eur Radiol 23:513–520. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-012-2601-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 41.Squillaci E, Manenti G, Cova M, Di Roma M, Miano R, Palmieri G, Simonetti G (2004) Correlation of diffusion-weighted MR imaging with cellularity of renal tumours. Anticancer Res 24:4175–4179Google Scholar
- 42.Stupp R, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ, Weller M, Fisher B, Taphoorn MJ, Belanger K, Brandes AA, Marosi C, Bogdahn U, Curschmann J, Janzer RC, Ludwin SK, Gorlia T, Allgeier A, Lacombe D, Cairncross JG, Eisenhauer E, Mirimanoff RO (2005) Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 352:987–996. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa043330 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 43.Stupp R, Taillibert S, Kanner AA, Kesari S, Steinberg DM, Toms SA, Taylor LP, Lieberman F, Silvani A, Fink KL, Barnett GH, Zhu JJ, Henson JW, Engelhard HH, Chen TC, Tran DD, Sroubek J, Tran ND, Hottinger AF, Landolfi J, Desai R, Caroli M, Kew Y, Honnorat J, Idbaih A, Kirson ED, Weinberg U, Palti Y, Hegi ME, Ram Z (2015) Maintenance therapy with tumor-treating fields plus temozolomide vs temozolomide alone for glioblastoma: a randomized clinical trial. Jama 314:2535–2543. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2015.16669 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 44.Sunwoo L, Choi SH, Park CK, Kim JW, Yi KS, Lee WJ, Yoon TJ, Song SW, Kim JE, Kim JY, Kim TM, Lee SH, Kim JH, Sohn CH, Park SH, Kim IH, Chang KH (2013) Correlation of apparent diffusion coefficient values measured by diffusion MRI and MGMT promoter methylation semiquantitatively analyzed with MS-MLPA in patients with glioblastoma multiforme. J Magn Reson Imaging 37:351–358. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.23838 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 46.van den Bent MJ, Baumert B, Erridge SC, Vogelbaum MA, Nowak AK, Sanson M, Brandes AA, Clement PM, Baurain JF, Mason WP, Wheeler H, Chinot OL, Gill S, Griffin M, Brachman DG, Taal W, Ruda R, Weller M, McBain C, Reijneveld J, Enting RH, Weber DC, Lesimple T, Clenton S, Gijtenbeek A, Pascoe S, Herrlinger U, Hau P, Dhermain F, van Heuvel I, Stupp R, Aldape K, Jenkins RB, Dubbink HJ, Dinjens WNM, Wesseling P, Nuyens S, Golfinopoulos V, Gorlia T, Wick W, Kros JM (2017) Interim results from the CATNON trial (EORTC study 26053-22054) of treatment with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide for 1p/19q non-co-deleted anaplastic glioma: a phase 3, randomised, open-label intergroup study. Lancet 390:1645–1653. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(17)31442-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar