Neurosurgical Review

, Volume 41, Issue 2, pp 497–501 | Cite as

Prospective and retrospective study of videoconference telemedicine follow-up after elective neurosurgery: results of a pilot program

  • Melissa Reider-Demer
  • Pushpa Raja
  • Neil Martin
  • Mariel Schwinger
  • Diana Babayan
Original Article


Existing literature suggests that use of telemedicine during postoperative appointments can increase access to care and is valued by patients and providers alike. While research examining the clinical equivalency of telemedicine visits for postoperative care has been growing, few studies have reported on telemedicine follow-up after neurosurgery. This study examined if a videoconferencing visit could substitute for an in-person clinic visit for elective neurosurgical cases in the USA. This was a single-center prospective study of patients who underwent elective neurosurgical procedures (aneurysm clipping, resection of cavernous angiomas, resection of arterial venous malformation, microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia and hemifacial spasm, and certain benign brain tumors) and were offered telemedicine follow-up care by an allied health professional during the first 90 days after neurosurgery. Prospective data was compared to a historical group of patients who underwent the same procedures and received in-person postoperative follow-up. Patients in the prospective group were contacted by telephone 2–6 weeks after surgery by a nurse practitioner and assessed using a standard template that included incidence of reported postoperative seizures, fever, and performance of activities of daily living. Primary outcome measures included percentage of patients accepting telemedicine, clinical and functional status, complications, patient satisfaction, patient travel time and distance, and rates of emergency room care or hospitalization within 90 days of discharge. Ninety-nine patients were included in the study, with 57 in the prospective group and 42 in the historical group. Of the 57 prospective patients, 47 accepted telemedicine in lieu of an in-person clinic visit. Emergency room visits and readmission rates at 30 and 90 days postoperatively did not differ significantly between the study groups, nor was there any significant difference in clinical variables that were recorded in the electronic medical record more than 80% of the time. This study demonstrates the safety and value of telemedicine as an alternative method of postoperative clinical care for patients undergoing elective neurosurgery. Telemedicine avoids unnecessary travel time and was welcomed by the majority of patients without compromising clinical or functional outcomes.


Elective neurosurgery Videoconference Telemedicine 


Compliance with ethical standards


This project did not receive funding.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

Approved by the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Investigational Review Board (IRB) for the Protection of Human Subjects.

Informed consent

All subjects gave informed consent prior to participation in conformity with procedures approved by the UCLA IRB.


  1. 1.
    Armstrong K, Semple J, Covie P (2014) Replacing ambulatory surgical follow-up visits with mobile app home monitoring: modeling cost-effective scenarios. J Med Internet Res 16(9):e213Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gunter RL, Chouinard S, Fernandes-Taylor S, Wiseman J (2016) Current use of telemedicine for post-discharge surgical care: a systematic review. J Am Coll Surg 222(5):915–927Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Burke D, Menechemi N, Brooks RG (2005) Diffusion of information technology supporting the institute of medicines quality chasm care aims. J Healthc Qual 27(1):24–32CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dadlani R, Mani, Subramanyan M, Ganesh J, Mohan D, Rajgopalan N et al (2014) The impact of telemedicine in the post operative care of the neurosurgery patient in an outpatient clinic: a unique perspective of this valuable resource in the developing world—an experience of more than 3000 teleconsultations. World Neurosurg 82(3–4):270–83Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hwa K, Wren SM (2013) Telehealth follow up in lieu of postoperative clinic visit for ambulatory surgery: results of a pilot program. JAMA Surg 148(9):823–827CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rosman J, Slane S, Dery B, Vogelbaum M, Cohen-Gadol A et al (2013) Is there a shortage of neurosurgeons in the United States? Neurosurg 73(2):354–5; discussion 365–6Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Eisenberg D, Hwa K, Wren SM (2015) Telephone follow-up by a midlevel provider after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair instead of face-to-face clinic visit. JSLS 19(1):e2014.00205Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Glavind K, Bjørk J, Lindquist AS (2014) A retrospective study on telephone follow-up of anterior colporrhaphy by a specialized nurse. Int Urogynecol J 25(12):1693–7Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mishra A, Kapoor L, Mishra SK (2009) Post-operative care through tele-follow up visits in patients undergoing thyroidectomy and parathyroidectomy in a resource-constrained environment. J Telemed Telecare 15(2):73–6Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of NeurologyUniversity of California Los AngelesLos AngelesUSA
  2. 2.VA National Quality Scholars Program, VA Greater Los Angeles SystemLos AngelesUSA
  3. 3.Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavorial SciencesUniversity of California Los AngelesLos AngelesUSA
  4. 4.Department of NeurosurgeryUniversity of California Los AngelesLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations