Cranial dural arteriovenous shunts. Part 3. Classification based on the leptomeningeal venous drainage
- 847 Downloads
The commonly used Borden and Cognard classification systems for the prediction of clinical behavior of cranial dural arteriovenous shunts focus on the venous drainage, particularly the presence of leptomeningeal venous drainage, and on the direction of flow, particularly the presence of retrograde flow. In addition, the latter includes ectasia and spinal drainage as criteria of two distinct grades. However, none of the above classifications (a) differentiates direct from exclusive leptomeningeal venous drainage, (b) considers cortical venous congestion as a factor potentially associated with an aggressive clinical course, and (c) anticipates ectasia in shunts with a mixed dural-cortical venous drainage (type 2). In this study, we analyzed the angiographic images of 107 consecutive patients having a cranial dural arteriovenous fistula with leptomeningeal venous drainage, based on a newly developed scheme. This scheme, symbolized with the acronym “DES,” groups the dural shunts according to three factors: directness and exclusivity of leptomeningeal venous drainage and signs of venous strain. According to the combination of the three factors, eight different groups were distinguished. All analyzed cases could be assigned to one of these groups. Directness of leptomeningeal venous drainage expresses the exact site of the shunt (bridging vein vs sinus wall), whereas exclusivity expresses venous outlet restrictions. All bridging vein shunts had a direct leptomeningeal venous drainage. Almost all bridging vein shunts and all “isolated” sinus shunts had an exclusive leptomeningeal venous drainage. Venous strain, manifested as ectasia and/or congestion, denotes the decompensation of the cerebral venous system due to the shunt reflux. The comparison of the presented concept with the currently used classifications highlighted the advantages of the former and the weaknesses of the latter.
KeywordsDural arteriovenous shunts Arteriovenous fistula Leptomeningeal drainage Cortical venous drainage Retrograde flow Classification
We wish to thank Professor V. Runge for his valuable comments on the manuscript and knowledgeable suggestions.
Conflict of interest
We declare that we have no conflict of interest.
- 5.Mironov A (1995) Classification of spontaneous dural arteriovenous fistulas with regard to their pathogenesis. Acta Radiol 36(6):582–592Google Scholar
- 9.Osbun JW, Kim LJ, Spetzler RF, McDougall CG (2013) Aberrant venous drainage pattern in a medial sphenoid wing dural arteriovenous fistula: a case report and review of the literature. World neurosurgeryGoogle Scholar
- 18.De Miquel MA, Mateu JMD, Cusi V, Naidich TP (1996) Embryogenesis of the veins of the posterior fossa: an overview. In: Hakuba A (ed) Surgery of the intracranial venous system: embryology, anatomy, pathophysiology, neuroradiology, diagnosis, treatment. Springer, London, pp 14–25Google Scholar
- 20.Lasjaunias P, Berenstein A, ter Brugge K (2001) Surgical neuroangiography: dural arteriovenous shunts, vol 2.2. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar