The use of the endoscope in the cerebellopontine angle (CPA) has been suggested to minimize cerebellar retraction and reduce the size of the craniotomy. 3D endoscopy combines the benefits of conventional 2D endoscopy with the added benefit of stereoscopic perception, though improved visualization alone does not guarantee improved surgical maneuverability and a better surgical outcome. We propose a new combined dual-port endoscope-assisted pre- and retrosigmoid approach to improve visualization and accessibility of the CPA with shortened distances and increased surgical maneuverability of neurovascular structures. We analyze surgical exposure and maneuverability of this approach and compare it with the surgical microscopic and a conventional single-port endoscope-assisted retrosigmoid approach. This combined pre- and retrosigmoid approach was performed on eight cadaveric heads (16 sides). The endoscopic probe was inserted through the presigmoid surgical port while surgical manipulation was performed through the retrosigmoid corridor. The CPA was divided into three compartments, from medial to lateral, the anteromedial, and the middle and the posterolateral. The microscope provided good visualization of the posterolateral and middle compartments, whereas poor visualization was offered of the anteromedial compartment. The dual-port endoscopic approach dramatically improved visualization and surgical maneuverability of the anteromedial compartments, clivus, and related neurovascular structures. Additionally, the 3D endoscope allowed for a better understanding of the surgical anatomy of the CPA and improved visualization of structures located in the anteromedial compartments towards the midline. This approach allowed for full realization of the benefits of endoscopic-assisted technique by improving surgical access and maneuverability.
3D Endoscopy Microsurgical anatomy Retrosigmoid approach Presigmoid approach Cerebellopontine angle
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Conflict of interest
The authors have no personal financial or institutional interest/conflicts with any of the materials or devices described in this article.
Badr-El-Dine M, El-Garem H, Talaat A, Magnan J (2002) Endoscopically assisted minimally invasive microvascular decompression of hemifacial spasm. Otol Neurotol 23:122–128PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beer Furlan A, Evins AI, Rigante L, Anichini G, Stieg PE, Bernardo A (2014) Dual-Port 2D and 3D Endoscopy: Expanding the Limits of the Endonasal Approaches to Midline Skull Base Lesions with Lateral Extension. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. doi:10.1055/s-0033-1364165
Cohen NL (1992) Retrosigmoid approach for acoustic tumor removal. Otolaryngol Clin N Am 25:295–310Google Scholar
El-Garem HF, Badr-El-Dine M, Talaat AM, Magnan J (2002) Endoscopy as a tool in minimally invasive trigeminal neuralgia surgery. Otol Neurotol 23:132–135PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magnan J, Barbieri M, Mora R, Murphy S, Meller R, Bruzzo M et al (2002) Retrosigmoid approach for small and medium-sized acoustic neuromas. Otol Neurotol 23:141–145PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehta GU, Lonser RR, Oldfield EH (2012) The history of pituitary surgery for Cushing disease. J Neurosurg 116:261–268PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miyazaki H, Deveze A, Magnan J (2005) Neuro-otologic surgery through minimally invasive retrosigmoid approach: endoscope assisted microvascular decompression, vestibular neurotomy, and tumor removal. Laryngoscope 115:1612–1617PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mostafa BW, El Sharnoubi M, Youssef AM (2008) The keyhole retrosigmoid approach to the cerebello-pontine angle: indications, technical modifications, and results. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 18:371–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ozveren MF, Türe U (2004) The microsurgical anatomy of the glossopharyngeal nerve with respect to the jugular foramen lesions. Neurosurg Focus 17(2):E3PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samii M, Gerganov V, Samii A (2006) Improved preservation of hearing and facial nerve function in vestibular schwannoma surgery via the retrosigmoid approach in a series of 200 patients. J Neurosurg 105:527–535PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shahinian HK, Ra Y (2011) 527 fully endoscopic resections of vestibular schwannomas. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 54:61–67PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shelton C, Alavi S, Li JC, Hitselberger WE (1995) Modified retrosigmoid approach: use for selected acoustic tumor removal. Am J Otol 16:664–668PubMedGoogle Scholar
Wackym PA, King WA, Meyer GA, Poe DS (2002) Endoscopy in neuro-otologic surgery. Otolaryngol Clin N Am 35:297–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar