Neurosurgical Review

, Volume 36, Issue 4, pp 551–558 | Cite as

Carotid artery stenting using the proximal or dual protection method for near occlusion of the cervical internal carotid artery

  • Shigeyuki Sakamoto
  • Yoshihiro Kiura
  • Yosuke Kajihara
  • Masaaki Shibukawa
  • Takahito Okazaki
  • Toshinori Matsushige
  • Katsuhiro Shinagawa
  • Kazutoshi Mukada
  • Kaoru Kurisu
Original Article

Abstract

The treatment for patients with near occlusion of the cervical internal carotid artery (ICA) is controversial. The aim of this study was to examine the results of carotid artery stenting (CAS) as a surgical treatment for ICA near occlusion. Between April 2008 and September 2012, 14 patients (all men; mean age, 75.4 years) with ICA near occlusion were treated with CAS. This represents 5.2 % of a total of 267 patients treated with CAS during the study period. All patients were treated with CAS using an embolic protection device. The proximal balloon protection method was performed in five patients, and the dual protection method using a proximal balloon and distal filter protection was used in nine patients. We examined the change of stenotic lesion, hyperintensity spot in diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and perioperative complications after CAS. All near occlusions were successfully dilated. Among 2 of 14 patients, DWI showed 1 and 4 hyperintensity spots. Transient and persistent complications, including neurological deficits, did not occur in any patients. In this small number of cases, CAS using the proximal or dual embolic protection method seems to be a safe and beneficial treatment for ICA near occlusion.

Keywords

Carotid artery stenting Dual protection Embolic protection device Near occlusion Proximal protection 

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Brott TG, Hobson RW 2nd, Howard G, Roubin GS, Clark WM, Brooks W, Mackey A, Hill MD, Leimgruber PP, Sheffet AJ, Howard VJ, Moore WS, Voeks JH, Hopkins LN, Cutlip DE, Cohen DJ, Popma JJ, Ferguson RD, Cohen SN, Blackshear JL, Silver FL, Mohr JP, Lal BK, Meschia JF, Investigators CREST (2010) Stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of carotid-artery stenosis. N Engl J Med 363:11–23PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    European Carotid Surgery Trialists' Collaborative Group (1998) Randomised trial of endarterectomy for recently symptomatic carotid stenosis: final results of the MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST). Lancet 351:1379–1387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fox AJ (1993) How to measure carotid stenosis. Radiology 186:316–318PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fox AJ, Eliasziw M, Rothwell PM, Schmidt MH, Warlow CP, Barnett HJ (2005) Identification, prognosis, and management of patients with carotid artery near occlusion. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 26:2086–2094PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    González A, Gil-Peralta A, Mayol A, Gonzalez-Marcos JR, Moniche F, Aguilar M, Gutierrez I (2011) Internal carotid artery stenting in patients with near occlusion: 30-day and long-term outcome. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 32:252–258PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gurm HS, Yadav JS, Fayad P, Katzen BT, Mishkel GJ, Bajwa TK, Ansel G, Strickman NE, Wang H, Cohen SA, Massaro JM, Cutlip DE, Investigators SAPPHIRE (2008) Long-term results of carotid stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med 358:1572–1579PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hirata Y, Sakata N, Inoue T, Yasumori K, Yasaka M, Okada Y (2011) Histopathological features with angiographic correlates of internal carotid artery pseudo-occlusion: impact of plaque compositions. Clinical article. J Neurosurg 115:350–358PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jeong YH, Hwang JY, Kim IS, Park Y, Hwang SJ, Lee SW, Kwak CH, Park SW (2010) Adding cilostazol to dual antiplatelet therapy achieves greater platelet inhibition than high maintenance dose clopidogrel in patients with acute myocardial infarction: Results of the adjunctive cilostazol versus high maintenance dose clopidogrel in patients with AMI (ACCEL-AMI) study. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 3:17–26PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lee SW, Park SW, Yun SC, Kim YH, Park DW, Kim WJ, Lee JY, Lee CW, Hong MK, Kim JJ, Park SJ (2010) Triple antiplatelet therapy reduces ischemic events after drug-eluting stent implantation: Drug-Eluting stenting followed by Cilostazol treatment REduces Adverse Serious cardiac Events (DECREASE registry). Am Heart J 159:284–291PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lippman HH, Sundt TM Jr, Holman CB (1970) The poststenotic carotid slim sign: supurious internal carotid hypolasia. Mayo Clin Proc 45:762–767PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Matsushige T, Kiura Y, Sakamoto S, Okazaki T, Shinagawa K, Ichinose N, Takasu M, Akiyama Y, Sugiyama K, Kurisu K (2013) Multiple antiplatelet therapy contributes to the reversible high signal spots on diffusion-weighted imaging in elective coiling of unruptured cerebral aneurysm. Neuroradiology 55:449–457Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mehigan JT, Olcott C 4th (1980) The carotid "string" sign. Differential diagnosis and management. Am J Surg 140:137–143PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Morgenstern LB, Fox AJ, Sharpe BL, Eliasziw M, Barnett HJ, Grotta JC (1997) The risks and benefits of carotid endarterectomy in patients with near occlusion of the carotid artery. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) Group. Neurology 48:911–915PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nikas DN, Ghany MA, Stabile E, Sorropago G, Saccá S, Favero L, Zakaryan N, Reimers B, Rubino P (2010) Carotid artery stenting with proximal cerebral protection for patients with angiographic appearance of string sign. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 3:298–304PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (1991) Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med 325:445–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rothwell PM, Warlow CP (2000) Low risk of ischemic stroke in patients with reduced internal carotid artery lumen diameter distal to severe symptomatic carotid stenosis: cerebral protection due to low poststenotic flow? On behalf of the European Carotid Surgery Trialists' Collaborative Group. Stroke 31:622–630PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rothwell PM, Gutnikov SA, Warlow CP, European Carotid Surgery Trialist's Collaboration (2003) Reanalysis of the final results of the European Carotid Surgery Trial. Stroke 34:514–523PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sekhar LN, Heros RC, Lotz PR, Rosenbaum AE (1980) Atheromatous pseudo-occlusion of the internal carotid artery. J Neurosurg 52:782–789PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Terada T, Tsuura M, Matsumoto H, Masuo O, Tsumoto T, Yamaga H, Itakura T (2006) Endovascular treatment for pseudo-occlusion of the internal carotid artery. Neurosurgery 59:301–309PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yadav JS, Wholey MH, Kuntz RE, Fayad P, Katzen BT, Mishkel GJ, Bajwa TK, Whitlow P, Strickman NE, Jaff MR, Popma JJ, Snead DB, Cutlip DE, Firth BG, Ouriel K, Stenting and Angioplasty with Protection in Patients at High Risk for Endarterectomy Investigators (2004) Protected carotid-artery stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med 351:1493–1501PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shigeyuki Sakamoto
    • 1
  • Yoshihiro Kiura
    • 1
  • Yosuke Kajihara
    • 2
  • Masaaki Shibukawa
    • 3
  • Takahito Okazaki
    • 1
  • Toshinori Matsushige
    • 1
  • Katsuhiro Shinagawa
    • 1
  • Kazutoshi Mukada
    • 2
  • Kaoru Kurisu
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of NeurosurgeryHiroshima University Graduate School of Biomedical and Health SciencesHiroshimaJapan
  2. 2.Department of NeurosurgeryItsukaichi Memorial HospitalHiroshimaJapan
  3. 3.Department of NeurosurgeryJA Hiroshima General HospitalHiroshimaJapan

Personalised recommendations