Neurosurgical Review

, Volume 36, Issue 3, pp 349–359 | Cite as

Endoscopic surgery for tuberculum sellae meningiomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Aaron J. Clark
  • Arman Jahangiri
  • Roxanna M. Garcia
  • Jonathan R. George
  • Michael E. Sughrue
  • Michael W. McDermott
  • Ivan H. El-Sayed
  • Manish K. Aghi
Review

Abstract

Recent reports of surgical resection of tuberculum sellae meningiomas through an endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) have provided an alternative to transcranial approaches in selected cases. However, these published reports have been limited by small sample size from single institutions. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to gain insight into potential limitations and benefits of EEA for tuberculum sellae meningiomas. We performed a systematic review of the literature and analyzed pooled data for descriptive statistics on short-term morbidity and outcomes. We compared EEA to transcranial approaches reported during the same time-frame. Six studies (49 patients) met inclusion criteria for EEA. A pooled analysis of transcranial results reported during a similar time period yielded 11 studies (412 patients). There were no differences in rate of gross total resection or peri-operative complications between the two groups. Although the EEA group was associated with higher rates of CSF leak (p < 0.05; OR 3.9; 95 % CI 1.15, 15.75), EEA were also associated with significantly higher rates of post-operative visual improvement compared to transcranial approaches (p < 0.05; OR 1.5; 95 % CI 1.18, 1.82). A systematic review of the small series of EEA for tuberculum sellae meningiomas published to date revealed similar extent of resection and morbidity, but increased post-operative visual improvement compared to transcranial approaches during a similar time period. Long-term follow-up will be needed to define recurrence rates of EEA as compared to transcranial approaches. Cautious use of EEA for the removal of smaller tuberculum sellae meningiomas after formal endoscopic training may be warranted.

Keywords

Endoscopic Tuberculum sellae Meningioma Craniotomy Meta-analysis 

Notes

Acknowledgments

A.J. is a Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI) Medical Research Fellow.

References

  1. 1.
    Bassiouni H, Asgari S, Stolke D (2006) Tuberculum sellae meningiomas: functional outcome in a consecutive series treated microsurgically. Surg Neurol 66:37–44, discussion 44–35CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bowers CA, Altay T, Couldwell WT (2011) Surgical decision-making strategies in tuberculum sellae meningioma resection. Neurosurg Focus 30:E1PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ceylan S, Koc K, Anik I (2011) Extended endoscopic transphenoidal approach for tuberculum sellae meningiomas. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 153:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chi JH, McDermott MW (2003) Tuberculum sellae meningiomas. Neurosurg Focus 14:e6CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chi JH, Parsa AT, Berger MS, Kunwar S, McDermott MW (2006) Extended bifrontal craniotomy for midline anterior fossa meningiomas: minimization of retraction-related edema and surgical outcomes. Neurosurgery 59:426–433, discussion ONS433-424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    de Divitiis E, Esposito F, Cappabianca P, Cavallo LM, de Divitiis O (2008) Tuberculum sellae meningiomas: high route or low route? A series of 51 consecutive cases. Neurosurgery 62:556–563, discussion 556–563CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    de Divitiis E, Esposito F, Cappabianca P, Cavallo LM, de Divitiis O, Esposito I (2008) Endoscopic transnasal resection of anterior cranial fossa meningiomas. Neurosurg Focus 25:E8CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    de Notaris M, Solari D, Cavallo LM, D’Enza AI, Ensenat J, Berenguer J, Ferrer E, Prats-Galino A, Cappabianca P (2012) The “suprasellar notch,” or the tuberculum sellae as seen from below: definition, features, and clinical implications from an endoscopic endonasal perspective. J Neurosurg 116:622–629CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    DerSimonian R (1990) Combining evidence from clinical trials. Anesth Analg 70:475–476CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    DerSimonian R (1996) Meta-analysis in the design and monitoring of clinical trials. Stat Med 15:1237–1248, discussion 1249–1252CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    DerSimonian R, Charette LJ, McPeek B, Mosteller F (1982) Reporting on methods in clinical trials. N Engl J Med 306:1332–1337CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    DerSimonian R, Laird N (1986) Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 7:177–188CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Eloy JA, Choudhry OJ, Shukla PA, Kuperan AB, Friedel ME, Liu JK (2012) Nasoseptal flap repair after endoscopic transsellar versus expanded endonasal approaches: is there an increased risk of postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak? Laryngoscope 122:1219–1225CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fatemi N, Dusick JR, de Paiva Neto MA, Malkasian D, Kelly DF (2009) Endonasal versus supraorbital keyhole removal of craniopharyngiomas and tuberculum sellae meningiomas. Neurosurgery 64:269–284, discussion 284–266CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Frank G, Pasquini E (2010) Tuberculum sellae meningioma: the extended transsphenoidal approach—for the virtuoso only? World Neurosurg 73:625–626CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fraser JF, Nyquist GG, Moore N, Anand VK, Schwartz TH (2010) Endoscopic endonasal transclival resection of chordomas: operative technique, clinical outcome, and review of the literature. J Neurosurg 112:1061–1069CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Galal A, Faisal A, Al-Werdany M, El Shehaby A, Lotfy T, Moharram H (2010) Determinants of postoperative visual recovery in suprasellar meningiomas. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 152:69–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gardner PA, Kassam AB, Thomas A, Snyderman CH, Carrau RL, Mintz AH, Prevedello DM (2008) Endoscopic endonasal resection of anterior cranial base meningiomas. Neurosurgery 63:36–52, discussion 52–34CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Guthikonda B, Tobler WD Jr, Froelich SC, Leach JL, Zimmer LA, Theodosopoulos PV, Tew JM Jr, Keller JT (2010) Anatomic study of the prechiasmatic sulcus and its surgical implications. Clin Anat 23:622–628CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hadad G, Bassagasteguy L, Carrau RL, Mataza JC, Kassam A, Snyderman CH, Mintz A (2006) A novel reconstructive technique after endoscopic expanded endonasal approaches: vascular pedicle nasoseptal flap. Laryngoscope 116:1882–1886CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kassam AB, Thomas A, Carrau RL, Snyderman CH, Vescan A, Prevedello D, Mintz A, Gardner P (2008) Endoscopic reconstruction of the cranial base using a pedicled nasoseptal flap. Neurosurgery 63:44–52, discussion ONS52-43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kim TW, Jung S, Jung TY, Kim IY, Kang SS, Kim SH (2008) Prognostic factors of postoperative visual outcomes in tuberculum sellae meningioma. Br J Neurosurg 22:231–234CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kitano M, Taneda M, Nakao Y (2007) Postoperative improvement in visual function in patients with tuberculum sellae meningiomas: results of the extended transsphenoidal and transcranial approaches. J Neurosurg 107:337–346CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Komotar RJ, Starke RM, Raper DM, Anand VK, Schwartz TH (2012) Endoscopic endonasal versus open transcranial resection of anterior midline skull base meningiomas. World Neurosurg 77(5–6):713–24. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2011.08.025 Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Laufer I, Anand VK, Schwartz TH (2007) Endoscopic, endonasal extended transsphenoidal, transplanum transtuberculum approach for resection of suprasellar lesions. J Neurosurg 106:400–406CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Li X, Liu M, Liu Y, Zhu S (2007) Surgical management of tuberculum sellae meningiomas. J Clin Neurosci 14:1150–1154CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Liu JK, Christiano LD, Patel SK, Tubbs RS, Eloy JA (2011) Surgical nuances for removal of tuberculum sellae meningiomas with optic canal involvement using the endoscopic endonasal extended transsphenoidal transplanum transtuberculum approach. Neurosurg Focus 30:E2CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Liu JK, Das K, Weiss MH, Laws ER Jr, Couldwell WT (2001) The history and evolution of transsphenoidal surgery. J Neurosurg 95:1083–1096CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Liu JK, Schmidt RF, Choudhry OJ, Shukla PA, Eloy JA (2012) Surgical nuances for nasoseptal flap reconstruction of cranial base defects with high-flow cerebrospinal fluid leaks after endoscopic skull base surgery. Neurosurg Focus 32:E7CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Mahmoud M, Nader R, Al-Mefty O (2010) Optic canal involvement in tuberculum sellae meningiomas: influence on approach, recurrence, and visual recovery. Neurosurgery 67:108–118, discussion ons118-109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    McDermott MW, Rootman J, Durity FA (1995) Subperiosteal, subperiorbital dissection and division of the anterior and posterior ethmoid arteries for meningiomas of the cribriform plate and planum sphenoidale: technical note. Neurosurgery 36:1215–1218, discussion 1218–1219CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Nakamura M, Roser F, Struck M, Vorkapic P, Samii M (2006) Tuberculum sellae meningiomas: clinical outcome considering different surgical approaches. Neurosurgery 59:1019–1028, discussion 1028–1019PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Nozaki K, Kikuta K, Takagi Y, Mineharu Y, Takahashi JA, Hashimoto N (2008) Effect of early optic canal unroofing on the outcome of visual functions in surgery for meningiomas of the tuberculum sellae and planum sphenoidale. Neurosurgery 62:839–844, discussion 844–836CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Park CK, Jung HW, Yang SY, Seol HJ, Paek SH, Kim DG (2006) Surgically treated tuberculum sellae and diaphragm sellae meningiomas: the importance of short-term visual outcome. Neurosurgery 59:238–243, discussion 238–243CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Sade B, Lee JH (2009) High incidence of optic canal involvement in tuberculum sellae meningiomas: rationale for aggressive skull base approach. Surg Neurol 72:118–123, discussion 123CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Snyderman CH, Carrau RL, Prevedello DM, Gardner P, Kassam AB (2009) Technologic innovations in neuroendoscopic surgery. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 42:883–890CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Stippler M, Gardner PA, Snyderman CH, Carrau RL, Prevedello DM, Kassam AB (2009) Endoscopic endonasal approach for clival chordomas. Neurosurgery 64:268–277, discussion 277–268CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Sughrue ME, McDermott MW, Parsa AT (2009) Vision salvage after resection of a giant meningioma in a patient with a loss in light perception. J Neurosurg 110:109–111CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Tabaee A, Anand VK, Barron Y, Hiltzik DH, Brown SM, Kacker A, Mazumdar M, Schwartz TH (2009) Endoscopic pituitary surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurosurg 111:545–554CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Van Gompel JJ, Frank G, Pasquini E, Zoli M, Hoover J, Lanzino G (2011) Expanded endonasal endoscopic resection of anterior fossa meningiomas: report of 13 cases and meta-analysis of the literature. Neurosurg Focus 30:E15PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Wang Q, Lu XJ, Ji WY, Yan ZC, Xu J, Ding YS, Zhang J (2010) Visual outcome after extended endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery for tuberculum sellae meningiomas. World Neurosurg 73:694–700CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Zanation AM, Carrau RL, Snyderman CH, Germanwala AV, Gardner PA, Prevedello DM, Kassam AB (2009) Nasoseptal flap reconstruction of high flow intraoperative cerebral spinal fluid leaks during endoscopic skull base surgery. Am J Rhinol Allergy 23:518–521CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aaron J. Clark
    • 1
    • 3
  • Arman Jahangiri
    • 1
    • 3
  • Roxanna M. Garcia
    • 1
  • Jonathan R. George
    • 2
    • 3
  • Michael E. Sughrue
    • 1
    • 3
  • Michael W. McDermott
    • 1
    • 3
  • Ivan H. El-Sayed
    • 2
    • 3
  • Manish K. Aghi
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Neurological SurgeryUniversity of CaliforniaSan FranciscoUSA
  2. 2.Department of OtolaryngologyUniversity of CaliforniaSan FranciscoUSA
  3. 3.Center for Minimally Invasive Skull Base SurgeryUniversity of CaliforniaSan FranciscoUSA

Personalised recommendations