Advertisement

Neurosurgical Review

, Volume 33, Issue 4, pp 409–417 | Cite as

Neurosurgical education in Europe and the United States of America

  • Jan-Karl Burkhardt
  • Pascal O. Zinn
  • Oliver Bozinov
  • Rivka R. Colen
  • Helmut Bertalanffy
  • Ekkehard M. Kasper
Review

Abstract

Training in neurological surgery is one of the most competitive and demanding specializations in medicine. It therefore demands careful planning in both the scientific and clinical neurosurgery arena to finally turn out physicians that can be clinically sound and scientifically competitive. National and international training and career options are pointed out, based on the available relevant literature, with the objective of comparing the neurosurgical training in Europe and the USA. Despite clear European Association of Neurosurgical Societies guidelines, every country in Europe maintains its own board requirements, which is reflected in an institutional curriculum that is specific to the professional society of that particular country. In contrast, the residency program in the USA is required to comply with the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education guidelines. Rather similar guidelines exist for the education of neurosurgical residents in the USA and Europe; their translation into the practical hospital setting and the resulting clinical lifestyle of a resident diverges enormously. Since neurosurgical education remains heterogeneous worldwide, we argue that a more standardized curriculum across different nations would greatly facilitate the interaction of different centers, allow a direct comparison of available services, and support the exchange of vital information for quality control and future improvements. Furthermore, the exchange of residents between different training centers may improve education by increasing their knowledge base, both technically as well as intellectually.

Keywords

Neurosurgery Education Residency Curriculum United States Europe 

Notes

Disclosure

Dr. Pascal O. Zinn is recipient of a scholarship by the Swiss National Science Foundation.

References

  1. 1.
    Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) (2009). http://www.acgme.org
  2. 2.
    American Board of Neurological Surgery (ABNS) (2009) ABNS Board Certification. http://www.abns.org/content/primary_certification_process.asp
  3. 3.
    Anwar M, Irfan S, Daly N, Amen F (2005) EWTD has negative impact on training for surgeons. BMJ 331(7530):1476CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Barbieri RL, Anastos L, Michels KB (2005) Economic factors and the percentage of residency positions filled by United States medical graduates. Obstet Gynecol 106(3):581–584PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Benzil DL, Abosch A, Germano I, WINS White Paper Committee et al (2008) The future of neurosurgery: a white paper on the recruitment and retention of women in neurosurgery. J Neurosurg 109(3):378–386CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cohen-Gadol AA, Piepgras DG, Krishnamurthy S, Fessler RD (2005) Resident duty hours reform: results of a national survey of the program directors and residents in neurosurgery training programs. Neurosurgery 56(2):398–403, discussion 398–403CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (DGNC) (2009). www.dgnc.de
  8. 8.
    Department of Health, UK (2009) http://www.dh.gov.uk
  9. 9.
    European Association of Neurosurgical Societies (EANS) (2009) http://www.eans.org
  10. 10.
    European Union of Medical Specialists (UEMS) (2009) http://www.uems.net
  11. 11.
    Friedman WA (2004) Resident duty hours in American neurosurgery. Neurosurgery 54(4):925–931, discussion 931–933CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Harbaugh RE, Agarwal A (2006) Training residents in endovascular neurosurgery. Neurosurgery 59(5 Suppl 3):S277–S281, discussion S3–13PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Johns Hopkins University, Department of Neurosurgery (2009) http://www.neuro.jhmi.edu
  14. 14.
    Long DM (1996) Educating neurosurgeons for the 21st century. Neurosurg Q 62(2):78–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Long DM (2004) Competency-based training in neurosurgery: the next revolution in medical education. Surg Neurol 61(1):5–14, discussion 14–25CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mayo Clinic, Department of Neurosurgery (2009) http://www.mayoclinic.org
  17. 17.
    Martin M, Burn SC (2005) Neurosurgical residency in the United States: a trainee’s experience. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 147(11):1211–1212, discussion 1212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Neurosurgery (2009) http://residents.neurosurgery.mgh.harvard.edu
  19. 19.
    Morris-Stiff GJ, Sarasin S, Edwards P, Lewis WG, Lewis MH (2005) The European working time directive: one for all and all for one? Surgery 137(3):293–297CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Neil-Dwyer G, Lang DA, Trojanowski T, European Union of Medical Specialists (2004) Neurosurgical training programme director position and responsibilities. Acta Neurochir Suppl 90:13–16PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sauvageau E, Hopkins LN (2006) Training in cerebrovascular disease: do we need to change the way we train residents? Neurosurgery 59(5 Suppl 3):S282–S286, discussion S3–13PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Schweizer Gesellschaft für Neurochirugie (2009) http://www.swissneurosurgery.ch
  23. 23.
    Steers J, Reulen HJ, Lindsay KW, European Union of Medical Specialists, Joint Residency Advisory and Accreditation Committee (2004) UEMS charter on training of medical specialists in the EU—the new neurosurgical training charter. Acta Neurochir Suppl 90:3–11PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sure U, Miller D, Bozinov O (2007) Neurosurgical training in Europe, problems and possible solutions. Surg Neurol 67(6):626–628, discussion 628–33CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Trojanowski T (2007) Report of the JRAAC on the situation of the accreditation Training Programmes in Europe. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 149(12):1277–1279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Trojanowski T (2008) Report of the JRAAC on the situation of the accreditation training programmes in Europe. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 150(8):851–853CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Women in Neurosurgery (WINS) (2009) http://www.neurosurgerywins.org

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jan-Karl Burkhardt
    • 1
    • 2
  • Pascal O. Zinn
    • 3
    • 5
  • Oliver Bozinov
    • 1
  • Rivka R. Colen
    • 4
  • Helmut Bertalanffy
    • 1
  • Ekkehard M. Kasper
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of NeurosurgeryUniversity Hospital, University of ZurichZurichSwitzerland
  2. 2.Regenerative Medicine Program, Department of Surgical ResearchUniversity Hospital ZurichZurichSwitzerland
  3. 3.Department of Neurosurgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical CenterHarvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA
  4. 4.Department of RadiologyBrigham and Women’s HospitalBostonUSA
  5. 5.Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Genomic Stability and DNA Repair, Dana-Farber Cancer InstituteHarvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations