Neurosurgical Review

, Volume 32, Issue 1, pp 23–28 | Cite as

Current strategies for the treatment of intracranial atherosclerotic internal carotid artery stenosis



We evaluate the current literature regarding treatment of intracranial atherosclerotic disease, with particular emphasis on emerging medical, surgical, and endovascular trials. A MEDLINE and PubMed search of the literature related to intracranial atherosclerotic disease was performed. Articles which discussed medical, surgical, and endovascular therapies were reviewed. Currently, best medical management of intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis consists of aspirin therapy. Despite this, a significant percentage of patients with high-grade stenoses experience recurrent stroke soon after their initial event. Although previous randomized trials demonstrated no benefit to performing intracranial–extracranial bypass surgery in patients with intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis, current studies seem to suggest a benefit in a particular subset of these patients, specifically those with hemodynamic compromise. Endovascular therapy for intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis is in its infancy but is beginning to show technical promise. Nonetheless, real concerns exist regarding rates of in-stent restenosis, and large-scale follow-up studies must be completed before the true efficacy of endovascular therapies can be evaluated. Symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. However, in a subgroup of patients, specifically those with high-grade stenoses and hemodynamic compromise, the risk of morbidity and mortality is significantly higher. It is this group of patients that would most benefit from more aggressive interventions, as best medical therapy still results in a significant rate of recurrent strokes. The emergence of improved surgical and endovascular techniques will be of particular importance in treating these high-risk patients.


Intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis Stroke Cerebral bypass Intracranial stenting Revascularization Wingspan STA–MCA bypass 


  1. 1.
    Abou-Chebl A, Bashir Q, Yadav JS (2005) Drug-eluting stents for the treatment of intracranial atherosclerosis: initial experience and midterm angiographic follow-up. Stroke 36:165–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Adams HP Jr, Powers WJ, Grubb RL Jr, Clarke WR, Woolson RF (2001) Preview of a new trial of extracranial-to-intracranial arterial anastomosis: The Carotid Occlusion Surgery Study. Neurosurg Clin N Am 12:613–624PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Amin-Hanjani S, Charbel FT (2006) Is extracranial–intracranial bypass surgery effective in certain patients? Neurol Clin 24:729–743PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Anonymous (1985) Failure of extracranial–intracranial arterial bypass to reduce the risk of ischemic stroke. Results of an international randomized trial. The EC/IC Bypass Study Group. N Engl J Med 313:1191–2000Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bose A, Hartmann M, Henkes H, Liu HM, Teng MMH, Szikora I et al (2007) A novel, self-expanding, nitonol stent in medically refractory intracranial atherosclerotic stenoses: The Wingspan Study. Stroke 38:1531–1537PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chimowitz MI, Kokkinos J, Strong J, Brown MB, Levine SR, Silliman S et al (1995) The Warfarin-Aspirin Symptomatic Intracranial Disease Study. Neurology 45:1488–1493PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chimowitz MI, Lynn MJ, Howlett-Smith H, Stern BJ, Hertzberg VS, Frankel MR et al (2005) Comparison of warfarin and aspirin for symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis. N Engl J Med 352:1305–1316PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Crowley RW, Medel R, Dumont AS (2008) Evolution of cerebral revascularization techniques. Neurosurg Focus 24:e3PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Derdeyn CP, Videen TO, Grubb RL Jr, Powers WJ (2001) Comparison of PET oxygen extraction fraction methods for the prediction of stroke risk. J Nucl Med 42:1195–1197PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fessler RD, Lanzino G, Guterman LR, Miletich RS, Lopes DK, Hopkins LN (1999) Improved cerebral perfusion after stenting of a petrous carotid stenosis: technical case report. Neurosurgery 45:638–642PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fiorella D, Levy EI, Turk AS, Albuquerque FC, Niemann DB, Aagaard-Kienitz B et al (2007) US multicenter experience with the Wingspan stent system for the treatment of intracranial atheromatous disease: periprocedural results. Stroke 38:881–887PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fiorella D, Woo HH (2007) Emerging endovascular therapies for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic disease. Stroke 38:2391–2396PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Grubb RL Jr, Powers WJ (2001) Risks of stroke and current indications for cerebral revascularization in patients with carotid occlusion. Neurosurg Clin N Am 12:473–487PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Grubb RL Jr, Powers WJ, Derdeyn CP, Adams HP, Clarke WR (2003) The Carotid Occlusion Surgery Study. Neurosurg Focus 14:e9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kasner SE, Lynn MJ, Chimowitz MI, Frankel MR, Howlett-Smith H, Hertzberg VS et al (2006) Warfarin vs aspirin for symptomatic intracranial stenosis: subgroup analyses from WASID. Neurology 67:1275–1278PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Langer DJ, Van Der Zwan A, Vajkoczy P, Tulleken CAF (2008) Excimer laser-assisted nonocclusive anastomosis: an emerging technology for use in the creation of intracranial-intracranial and extracranial–intracranial cerebral bypass. Neurosurg Focus 24:e6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Levine RL, Hafeez F, Khasru MA, Dulli DA (2001) Isolated petrous carotid stenosis and transient ischemic attack. J Neuroimaging 11:189–193PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Levy EI, Turk AS, Albuquerque FC, Niemann DB, Aagaard-Kienitz B, Pride L et al (2007) Wingspan in-stent restenosis and thrombosis: incidence, clinical presentation, and management. Neurosurgery 61:644–651PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mazighi M, Tanasescu R, Ducrocq X, Vicaut E, Bracard S, Houdart E et al (2006) Prospective study of symptomatic atherothrombotic intracranial stenoses: The GESICA Study. Neurology 66:1187–1191PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mizumura S, Nakagawara J, Takahashi M, Kumita S, Cho K, Nakajo H et al (2004) Three-dimensional display in staging hemodynamic brain ischemia for JET study: objective evaluation using SEE analysis and 3D-SSP display. Ann Nucl Med 18:13–21PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ogasawara K, Kikuchi H, Yamadori S, Hayashida K, Mori E, Kirino T et al (2002) Japanese EC–IC Bypass Trial (JET Study): the second interim analysis. Surgery for Cerebral Stroke 30:434–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Raabe A, Beck J, Gerlach R, Zimmermann M, Seifert V (2003) Near-infrared indocyanine green video angiography: a new method for intraoperative assessment of vascular flow. Neurosurgery 52:132–139PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Steinfort B, Ng PP, Faulder K, Harrington T, Grinnell V, Sorby W et al (2007) Midterm outcomes of paclitaxel-eluting stents for the treatment of intracranial posterior circulation stenoses. J Neurosurg 106:222–225PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Terada T, Tsuura M, Matsumoto H, Masuo O, Tsumoto T, Yamaga H et al (2003) Endovascular therapy for stenosis of the petrous or cavernous portion of the internal carotid artery: percutaneous transluminal angioplasty compared with stent placement. J Neurosurg 98:491–497PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Thomas AJ, Gupta R, Tayal AH, Horowitz MB, Jovin TG (2007) Stenting and angioplasty of the symptomatic chronically occluded carotid artery. Am J Neuroradiol 28:168–171PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Turk AS, Levy EI, Albuquerque FC, Pride GL, Woo H, Welch BG et al (2008) Influence of patient age and stenosis location of Wingspan in-stent restenosis. Am J Neuroradiol 29:23–27PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Woitzik J, Horn P, Vajkoczy P, Schmiedek P (2005) Intraoperative control of extracranial–intracranial bypass patency by near-infrared indocyanine green videoangiography. J Neurosurg 102:692–698PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Neurovascular and Skull Base Surgery Program, Department of NeurosurgeryYale University School of MedicineNew HavenUSA

Personalised recommendations