Neurosurgical Review

, Volume 27, Issue 4, pp 252–258 | Cite as

Cervical spondylotic myelopathy and radiculopathy treated by oblique corpectomies without fusion

  • R. Kemal Koç
  • Ahmet Menkü
  • Hidayet Akdemir
  • Bülent Tucer
  • Ali Kurtsoy
  • İ. Suat Öktem
Original Article

Abstract

Oblique corpectomy (OC) is an alternative technique for the resection of spondylotic spurs ventral to the cervical spinal cord contributing to cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) and cervical spondylotic radiculopathy (CSR). To evaluate the efficacy of OC for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myeloradiculopathy, we reviewed our experience with OC. Twenty-six patients, 18 males and 8 females, were studied. They averaged 51.3 years of age (range 30–72), Thirteen had myelopathy and 13, radiculopathy. Both magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and computed tomography (CT) were performed preoperatively to define the extent of pathology. The Modified Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score was used to grade the quality of the outcome. Neurologic and radiologic results were assessed. Good and excellent results were observed in 76.9% of the cases with myelopathy. Improvement of radicular symptoms was noted in 84.6% of the cases with radiculopathy. Neuroimaging studies confirmed satisfactory anatomical decompression in all patients. Sagittal alignment decreased from 13° to 12°. The degree of postoperative recovery seemed to be directly related to the age and severity of the preoperative myelopathy. This surgical technique has shown excellent clinical outcomes with fast recovery and adequate anatomical decompression in patients with CSM and CSR.

Keywords

Anterolateral approach Cervical spondylotic myelopathy Cervical spondylotic radiculopathy Oblique corpectomy 

References

  1. 1.
    Chiles BW III, Leonard MA, Choudhri HF, Cooper PR (1999) Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: patterns of neurological deficit and recovery after anterior cervical decompression. Neurosurgery 44:762–769PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fager CA (1973) Results of adequate posterior decompression in the relief of spondylotic cervical myelopathy. J Neurosurg 38:684–692PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fessler RG, Steck JC, Giovanini MA (1998) Anterior cervical corpectomy for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Neurosurgery 43:257–265PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    George B, Lot G (1994) Oblique transcorporeal drilling to treat anterior compression of the spinal cord at the cervical level. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 37:48–52PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    George B, Zerah M, Lot G, Hurth M (1993) Oblique transcorporeal approach to anteriorly located lesions in the cervical spinal canal. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 121:187–190Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    George B, Gauthier N, Lot G (1999) Multisegmental cervical spondylotic myelopathy and radiculopathy treated by multilevel oblique corpectomies without fusion. Neurosurgery 44:81–90PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Herkowitz HN, Kurz LT, Overholt DP (1990) Surgical management of cervical soft disc herniation. A comparison between the anterior and posterior approach. Spine 15:1026–1030PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hirabayashi K, Miyakawa J, Satomi K, Maruyama T, Wakano K (1981) Operative results and postoperative progression of ossification among patients with ossification of cervical posterior longitudinal ligament. Spine 6:354–364PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jho HD (1996) Microsurgical anterior cervical foraminotomy for radiculopathy: a new approach to cervical disc herniation. J Neurosurg 84:155–160PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jho HD (1997) Decompression via microsurgical anterior foraminotomy for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Technical note. J Neurosurg 86:297–302PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jho HD (1997) Spinal cord decompression via microsurgical anterior foraminotomy for spondylotic cervical myelopathy. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 40:124–129PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jho HD, Kim MH, Kim WK (2002) Anterior cervical microforaminotomy for spondylotic cervical myelopathy: part 2. Neurosurgery 51(Suppl 2):54–59Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Katsumi Y, Honma T, Nakamura T (1989) Analysis of cervical instability resulting from laminectomies for removal of spinal cord tumor. Spine 14:1171–1176PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lee TT, Manzano GR, Green BA (1997) Modified open-door cervical expansive laminoplasty for spondylotic myelopathy: operative technique, outcome, and predictors for gait improvement. J Neurosurg 86:64–68PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lunsford LD, Bissonette DJ, Zorub DS (1980) Anterior surgery for cervical disc disease. Part 2. Treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy in 32 cases. J Neurosurg 53:12–19PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Morio Y, Teshima R, Nagashima H, Nawata K, Yamasaki D, Nanjo Y (2001) Correlation between operative outcomes of cervical compression myelopathy and MRI of the spinal cord. Spine 26:1238–1245CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wada E, Yonenobu K, Suzuki S, Kanazawa A, Ochi T (1999) Can intramedullary signal change on magnetic resonance imaging predict surgical outcome in cervical spondylotic myelopathy? Spine 24:455–461CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wada E, Suzuki S, Kanazawa A, Matsuoka T, Miyamoto S, Yonenobu K (2001) Subtotal corpectomy versus laminoplasty for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a long-term follow-up study over 10 years. Spine 26:1443–1447CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    White AA III, Johnson RM, Panjabi MM, Southwick WO (1975) Biomechanical analysis of clinical stability in the cervical spine. Clin Orthop 109:85–96PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Kemal Koç
    • 1
  • Ahmet Menkü
    • 1
  • Hidayet Akdemir
    • 1
  • Bülent Tucer
    • 1
  • Ali Kurtsoy
    • 1
  • İ. Suat Öktem
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of MedicineErciyes UniversityKayseriTurkey

Personalised recommendations