Drought response in the spikes of barley: gene expression in the lemma, palea, awn, and seed
- 833 Downloads
The photosynthetic organs of the barley spike (lemma, palea, and awn) are considered resistant to drought. However, there is little information about gene expression in the spike organs under drought conditions. We compared response of the transcriptome of the lemma, palea, awn, and seed to drought stress using the Barley1 Genome Array. Barley plants were exposed to drought treatment for 4 days at the grain-filling stage by withholding water. At the end of the stress, relative water content of the lemma, palea, and awn dropped from 85% to 60%. Nevertheless, the water content of the seed only decreased from 89% to 81%. Transcript abundance followed the water status of the spike organs; the awn had more drought-regulated genes followed by lemma and palea, and the seed showed very little change in gene expression. Despite expressing more drought-associated genes, many genes for amino acid, amino acid derivative, and carbohydrate metabolism, as well as for photosynthesis, respiration, and stress response, were down-regulated in the awn compared with the lemma, palea, and seed. This suggests that the lemma and the palea are more resistant to drought stress compared with the awn.
KeywordsAwn Drought Lemma Palea Seed Transcriptome
We thank Diveena Vijeyandran, Aaron Walck, Ng Eng Hwa, Emily Jackson, and Justin Wilkins for their help on sample collection and RNA extraction and Matthew Moscou for initial analysis of the data set. We are grateful to Billie Hemmer and Stephanie Witt for assistance in growing plants. We thank Dr. Tesfaye Mersha for his advice on statistical analysis. This work was supported by the Board of Regents of the State of Iowa and the Office of Sponsored Programs, the Graduate College, the College of Natural Sciences and the Department of Biology of the University of Northern Iowa, Cedar Falls, Iowa. We thank Dr. Ronald W. Skadsen for his valuable comments.
- Abebe T, Wise RP, Skadsen RW (2009) Comparative transcriptional profiling established the awn as the major photosynthetic organ of the barley spike while the lemma and the palea primarily protect the seed. Plant Genome (in press)Google Scholar
- Bray EA, Bailey-Serres J, Weretilnyk E (2000) Responses to abiotic stresses. In: Buchanan B, Gruissem W, Jones R (eds) Biochemistry and molecular biology of plants. American Society of Plant Physiologists, Rockville, pp 1158–1203Google Scholar
- Duffus CM, Cochrane MP (1993) Formation of the barley grain—morphology, physiology, and biochemistry. In: MacGregor AW, Bhatty RS (eds) Barley: chemistry and technology. American Association of Cereal Chemists, St. Paul, pp 31–72Google Scholar
- Fan L, Linker R, Gepstein S, Tanimoto E, Yamamoto R, Neumann PM (2006) Progressive inhibition by water deficit of cell wall extensibility and growth along the elongation zone of maize roots is related to increased lignin metabolism and progressive stelar accumulation of wall phenolics. Plant Physiol 140:603–612CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Guo P, Baum M, Grando S, Ceccarelli S, Bai G, Li R, von Korff M, Varshney RK, Graner A, Valkoun J (2009) Differentially expressed genes between drought-tolerant and drought-sensitive barley genotypes in response to drought stress during the reproductive stage. J Exp Bot. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erp194 Google Scholar
- Kasukabe Y, He L, Nada K, Misawa S, Ihara I, Tachibana S (2004) Overexpression of spermidine synthase enhances tolerance to multiple environmental stresses and up-regulates the expression of various stress-regulated genes in transgenic Abidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol 45:712–722CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rachmilevitch S, DaCosta M, Huang B (2006) Physiological and biochemical indicators for stress tolerance. In: Huang B (ed) Plant–environment interactions, 3rd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 321–355Google Scholar
- Seki M, Narusaka M, Ishida J, Nanjo T, Fujita M, Oono Y, Kamiya A, Nakajima M, Enju A, Sakurai T, Satou M, Akiyama K, Taji T, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Carninci P, Kawai J, Hayashizaki Y, Shinozaki K (2002) Monitoring the expression profiles of 7000 Arabidopsis genes under drought, cold and high-salinity stresses using a full-length cDNA microarray. Plant J 31:279–292CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Setter TL, Flannigan BA, Melkonian J (2001) Loss of kernel set due to water deficit and shade in maize: carbohydrate supplies, abscisic acid, and cytokinins. Crop Sci 41:1530–1540Google Scholar
- Tommasini L, Svensson JT, Rodriguez EM, Wahid A, Malatrasi M, Kato K, Wanamaker S, Resnik J, Close TJ (2008) Dehydrin gene expression provides an indicator of low temperature and drought stress: transcriptome-based analysis of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Funct Integr Genomics 8:387–405CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Westgate ME (1994) Water status and development of the maize endosperm and embryo during drought. Crop Sci 34:76–83Google Scholar