CCTA in patients with positive troponin and low clinical suspicion for ACS: a useful diagnostic option to exclude obstructive CAD
It is uncertain whether patients with elevated troponin and non-classical presentation of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) should receive coronary CT angiography (CCTA). A proportion of these patients will have no coronary artery disease (CAD) and would benefit from non-invasive investigations and expedited discharge. Objectives were to determine most common diagnoses and rate of ACS among patients with positive troponin and low clinical suspicion of ACS who received CCTA.
IRB approved retrospective analysis of 491 consecutive patients in a level I trauma center ED referred for CCTA between April 4, 2015 to April 2, 2017. Patients were included if there was an elevated troponin (TnI > 0.045 μg/L) and atypical chest pain within 24 h prior to imaging. One hundred one patients met inclusion criteria; 17 excluded due to technical factors or history. Scans performed on dual-source CT.
Eighty-four patients (47 men, 37 women) with median TnI of 0.11 ± 0.21 μg/L underwent CCTA 8.20 ± 6.41 h after first elevated Tn. Mean age was 53.2 ± 14.6 years. CCTA demonstrated absence of CAD in 39 patients (46.4%; 20 M, 19 F). CAD < 25% stenosis was observed in 24 (28.6%; 9 M, 15 F). CAD with 25–50% stenosis was observed in seven (8.3%; six M, one F). CAD > 50% stenosis was observed in 11 (13.1%; 9 M, 2 F), and non-diagnostic in three (3.6%, 3 M, 0 F). Forty-six (56.8%) were discharged directly from ED with median stay 15.82 ± 6.41 h.
Use of CCTA in ED patients with elevated troponin and low clinical suspicion for ACS allowed obstructive CAD to be excluded in 83%.
KeywordsCoronary artery disease Acute coronary syndrome Troponin Coronary computed tomography angiography
We sincerely thank Dr. Morris Pudek, the Regional Medical Leader for Clinical Chemistry at Vancouver Coastal Health for his help in obtaining the troponin assay protocol and explaining the biochemistry involved in troponin detection.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 5.Amsterdam EA, Wenger NK, Brindis RG, Casey DE Jr, Ganiats TG, Holmes DR Jr, Jaffe AS, Jneid H, Kelly RF, Kontos MC, Levine GN, Liebson PR, Mukherjee D, Peterson ED, Sabatine MS, Smalling RW, Zieman SJ, Members AATF (2014) 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task Force on practice guidelines. Circulation 130(25):e344–e426. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000134 Google Scholar
- 7.Haberl R, Tittus J, Bohme E, Czernik A, Richartz BM, Buck J, Steinbigler P (2005) Multislice spiral computed tomographic angiography of coronary arteries in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: an effective filter before catheter angiography? Am Heart J 149(6):1112–1119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2005.02.048 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Raff GL, Chinnaiyan KM, Cury RC, Garcia MT, Hecht HS, Hollander JE, O’Neil B, Taylor AJ, Hoffmann U, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Guidelines C (2014) SCCT guidelines on the use of coronary computed tomographic angiography for patients presenting with acute chest pain to the emergency department: a report of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Guidelines Committee. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 8(4):254–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcct.2014.06.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Shrimpton PC, Hillier MC, Lewis MA, Dunn M (2005) Doses from computed tomography (CT) examinations in the UK—2003 review. UK National Radiological Protection Board (NRPB-W67)Google Scholar
- 10.Januzzi JL Jr, Bamberg F, Lee H, Truong QA, Nichols JH, Karakas M, Mohammed AA, Schlett CL, Nagurney JT, Hoffmann U, Koenig W (2010) High-sensitivity troponin T concentrations in acute chest pain patients evaluated with cardiac computed tomography. Circulation 121(10):1227–1234. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.893826 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Januzzi JL, Sharma U, Zakroysky P, Truong QA, Woodard PK, Pope JH, Hauser T, Mayrhofer T, Nagurney JT, Schoenfeld D, Peacock WF, Fleg JL, Wiviott S, Pang PS, Udelson J, Hoffmann U (2015) Sensitive troponin assays in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome: results from the multicenter rule out myocardial infarction using computer assisted tomography II trial. Am Heart J 169(4):572–578 e571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2014.12.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.deFilippi CR, Tocchi M, Parmar RJ, Rosanio S, Abreo G, Potter MA, Runge MS, Uretsky BF (2000) Cardiac troponin T in chest pain unit patients without ischemic electrocardiographic changes: angiographic correlates and long-term clinical outcomes. J Am Coll Cardiol 35(7):1827–1834. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0735-1097(00)00628-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Ropers D, Rixe J, Anders K, Kuttner A, Baum U, Bautz W, Daniel WG, Achenbach S (2006) Usefulness of multidetector row spiral computed tomography with 64- x 0.6-mm collimation and 330-ms rotation for the noninvasive detection of significant coronary artery stenoses. Am J Cardiol 97(3):343–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.08.050 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Schuijf JD, Pundziute G, Jukema JW, Lamb HJ, van der Hoeven BL, de Roos A, van der Wall EE, Bax JJ (2006) Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice multislice computed tomography in the noninvasive evaluation of significant coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 98(2):145–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.01.092 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Hoffmann U, Bamberg F, Chae CU, Nichols JH, Rogers IS, Seneviratne SK, Truong QA, Cury RC, Abbara S, Shapiro MD, Moloo J, Butler J, Ferencik M, Lee H, Jang IK, Parry BA, Brown DF, Udelson JE, Achenbach S, Brady TJ, Nagurney JT (2009) Coronary computed tomography angiography for early triage of patients with acute chest pain: the ROMICAT (rule out myocardial infarction using computer assisted tomography) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 53(18):1642–1650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2009.01.052 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Goldstein JA, Chinnaiyan KM, Abidov A, Achenbach S, Berman DS, Hayes SW, Hoffmann U, Lesser JR, Mikati IA, O’Neil BJ, Shaw LJ, Shen MY, Valeti US, Raff GL, Investigators C-S (2011) The CT-STAT (coronary computed tomographic angiography for systematic triage of acute chest pain patients to treatment) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 58(14):1414–1422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2011.03.068 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Hoffmann U, Truong QA, Schoenfeld DA, Chou ET, Woodard PK, Nagurney JT, Pope JH, Hauser TH, White CS, Weiner SG, Kalanjian S, Mullins ME, Mikati I, Peacock WF, Zakroysky P, Hayden D, Goehler A, Lee H, Gazelle GS, Wiviott SD, Fleg JL, Udelson JE, Investigators R-I (2012) Coronary CT angiography versus standard evaluation in acute chest pain. N Engl J Med 367(4):299–308. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1201161 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Altintas S, Cardinaels EP, Versteylen MO, Joosen IA, Seifert M, Wildberger JE, Crijns HJ, Nelemans PJ, Van Dieijen-Visser MP, Mingels AM, Das M, Kietselaer BL (2016) Unstable coronary plaque characteristics are associated with high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 10(1):82–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcct.2015.10.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar