Advertisement

Emergency Radiology

, Volume 26, Issue 1, pp 87–97 | Cite as

Placental abruption and hemorrhage—review of imaging appearance

  • Shaimaa A. FadlEmail author
  • Ken F. Linnau
  • Manjiri K. Dighe
Review Article
  • 226 Downloads

Abstract

Placental and periplacental bleeding are common etiologies for antepartum bleeding. Placental abruption complicates approximately 1% of pregnancies and is associated with increased maternal, fetal, and neonatal morbidity and mortality. This article reviews the normal placental appearance on ultrasound, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and then discusses the different morphological appearance of placental and periplacental hematomas along with their mimics. Hematomas are classified based on the location as retroplacental, marginal subchorionic, preplacental (subamniotic), or intraplacental. Placenta-related bleeding is a common finding during first trimester ultrasound and its detection can help triage the pregnant females into low- and high-risk groups. This article reviews placenta related bleeding in the setting of trauma. Trauma can complicate pregnancy with potential severe maternal and fetal outcomes. CT is usually performed as part of the trauma workup and it can be challenging for placental evaluation. MRI can characterize the age of the hematomas and can differentiate hematomas from tumors.

Keywords

Placenta Placental abruption Retroplacental hematoma Subchorionic hematoma-placental hematoma 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflicts of interests

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Fadl S, Moshiri M, Fligner CL, Katz DS, Dighe M (2017) Placental imaging: normal appearance with review of pathologic findings. Radiographics 37(3):979–998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tikkanen M (2011) Placental abruption: epidemiology, risk factors and consequences. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 90(2):140–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ananth CV, Lavery JA, Vintzileos AM et al (2016) Severe placental abruption: clinical definition and associations with maternal complications. Am J Obstet Gynecol 214(2):272 e1–272 e9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Boisrame T, Sananes N, Fritz G et al (2014) Placental abruption: risk factors, management and maternal-fetal prognosis. Cohort study over 10 years. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 179:100–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Raptis CA, Mellnick VM, Raptis DA et al (2014) Imaging of trauma in the pregnant patient. Radiographics 34(3):748–763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nguyen D, Nguyen C, Yacobozzi M, Bsat F, Rakita D (2012) Imaging of the placenta with pathologic correlation. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 33(1):65–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Oyelese Y, Ananth CV (2006) Placental abruption. Obstet Gynecol 108(4):1005–1016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Trop I, Levine D (2001) Hemorrhage during pregnancy: sonography and MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176(3):607–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Giordano R, Cacciatore A, Cignini P, Vigna R, Romano M (2010) Antepartum haemorrhage. J Prenat Med 4(1):12–16Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zaidi SF, Moshiri M, Osman S et al (2016) Comprehensive imaging review of abnormalities of the placenta. Ultrasound Q 32(1):25–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kanne JP, Lalani TA, Fligner CL (2005) The placenta revisited: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 34(6):238–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wei SH, Helmy M, Cohen AJ (2009) CT evaluation of placental abruption in pregnant trauma patients. Emerg Radiol 16(5):365–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Allen BC, Leyendecker JR (2013) Placental evaluation with magnetic resonance. Radiol Clin N Am 51(6):955–966CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Podrasky AE, Javitt MC, Glanc P, Dubinsky T, Harisinghani MG, Harris RD et al (2013) ACR appropriateness criteria® second and third trimester bleeding. Ultrasound Q 29(4):293–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ott J, Pecnik P, Promberger R, Pils S, Binder J, Chalubinski KM (2017) Intra- versus retroplacental hematomas: a retrospective case-control study on pregnancy outcomes. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 17(1):366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fitzgerald B, Shannon P, Kingdom J, Keating S (2011) Rounded intraplacental haematomas due to decidual vasculopathy have a distinctive morphology. J Clin Pathol 64(8):729–732CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Glantz C, Purnell L (2002) Clinical utility of sonography in the diagnosis and treatment of placental abruption. J Ultrasound Med 21(8):837–840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Shinde GR, Vaswani BP, Patange RP, Laddad MM, Bhosale RB (2016) Diagnostic performance of ultrasonography for detection of abruption and its clinical correlation and maternal and foetal outcome. J Clin Diagn Res 10(8):QC04–QC07Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bennett GL, Bromley B, Lieberman E, Benacerraf BR (1996) Subchorionic hemorrhage in first-trimester pregnancies: prediction of pregnancy outcome with sonography. Radiology 200(3):803–806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jha P, Paroder V, Mar W, Horowtiz JM, Poder L (2016) Multimodality imaging of placental masses: a pictorial review. Abdom Radiol (NY) 41(12):2435–2444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    D'Souza D, Olah KS (1999) Infarction of a placental chorioangioma mimicking placental abruption. J Obstet Gynaecol 19(4):421–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jha P, Melendres G, Bijan B, Ormsby E, Chu L, Li CS et al (2017) Trauma in pregnant women: assessing detection of post-traumatic placental abruption on contrast-enhanced CT versus ultrasound. Abdom Radiol (NY) 42(4):1062–1067CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sadro C, Bernstein MP, Kanal KM (2012) Imaging of trauma: part 2. Abdominal trauma and pregnancy—a radiologist's guide to doing what is best for the mother and baby. AJR Am J Roentgenol 199(6):1207–1219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Masselli G, Brunelli R, Di Tola M, Anceschi M, Gualdi G (2011) MR imaging in the evaluation of placental abruption: correlation with sonographic findings. Radiology 259(1):222–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Masselli G, Brunelli R, Parasassi T, Perrone G, Gualdi G (2011) Magnetic resonance imaging of clinically stable late pregnancy bleeding: beyond ultrasound. Eur Radiol 21(9):1841–1849CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Nagy S, Bush M, Stone J, Lapinski RH, Gardo S (2003) Clinical significance of subchorionic and retroplacental hematomas detected in the first trimester of pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 102(1):94–100Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Seki H, Kuromaki K, Takeda S, Kinoshita K (1998) Persistent subchorionic hematoma with clinical symptoms until delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 63(2):123–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ball RH, Ade CM, Schoenborn JA, Crane JP (1996) The clinical significance of ultransonographically detected subchorionic hemorrhages. Am J Obstet Gynecol 174(3):996–1002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Tuuli MG, Norman SM, Odibo AO, Macones GA, Cahill AG (2011) Perinatal outcomes in women with subchorionic hematoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 117(5):1205–1212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Norman SM, Odibo AO, Macones GA, Dicke JM, Crane JP, Cahill AG (2010) Ultrasound-detected subchorionic hemorrhage and the obstetric implications. Obstet Gynecol 116(2 Pt 1):311–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sauerbrei EE, Pham DH (1986) Placental abruption and subchorionic hemorrhage in the first half of pregnancy: US appearance and clinical outcome. Radiology 160(1):109–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Phillips CH, Wortman JR, Ginsburg ES, Sodickson AD, Doubilet PM, Khurana B (2018) First-trimester emergencies: a radiologist’s perspective. Emerg Radiol 25(1):61–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Manriquez M, Srinivas G, Bollepalli S, Britt L, Drachman D (2010) Is computed tomography a reliable diagnostic modality in detecting placental injuries in the setting of acute trauma? Am J Obstet Gynecol 202(6):611 e1–611 e5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kopelman TR, Bogert JN, Walters JW et al (2016) Computed tomographic imaging interpretation improves fetal outcomes after maternal trauma. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 81(6):1131–1135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Rheinboldt M, Delproposto Z (2015) Sonography of placental abnormalities: a pictorial review. Emerg Radiol 22(4):401–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Meisinger QC, Brown MA, Dehqanzada ZA, Doucet J, Coimbra R, Casola G (2016) A 10-year restrospective evaluation of ultrasound in pregnant abdominal trauma patients. Emerg Radiol 23(2):105–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Saphier NB, Kopelman TR (2014) Traumatic Abruptio Placenta Scale (TAPS): a proposed grading system of computed tomography evaluation of placental abruption in the trauma patient. Emerg Radiol 21(1):17–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Fadl SA, Sabry AS, Ramzan MM, Linnau KF (2017) Core curriculum case illustration: placental abruption. Emerg Radiol 24Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Seri I, Evans J (2008) Limits of viability: definition of the gray zone. J Perinatol 28(Suppl 1):S4–S8CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© American Society of Emergency Radiology 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of RadiologyUniversity of Washington Medical CenterSeattleUSA
  2. 2.Department of Radiology, Harborview Medical CenterUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations