Computed tomography for occult fractures of the proximal femur, pelvis, and sacrum in clinical practice: single institution, dual-site experience
- 431 Downloads
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of CT for assessment of occult fractures of the proximal femur, pelvis, and sacrum.
Materials and methods
A retrospective review was performed on patients who received a CT of the hip or pelvis for suspected occult fracture after negative or equivocal radiographs performed within 24 h. The official radiology report was utilized for the determination of CT findings and calculation of sensitivity and specificity. Surgical reports, MRI reports, and clinical follow-up were used as the standard of reference. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated with 95% confidence intervals.
Seventy-four patients received CT of the hip or pelvis for clinical concern for occult fracture after negative or equivocal radiographs. By the reference standard, a total of 40 fractures were present in 25/74 (33.8%) patients, including 35 conservatively treated fractures of the greater trochanter, pelvis, and sacrum, and 5 operatively treated proximal femoral fractures. A total of 14/74 (18.9%) of patients had an MRI within 1 day of CT. MRI identified an operatively treated femoral neck fracture not seen on CT and an operatively treated intertrochanteric fracture, which CT described as a greater trochanteric fracture. There were two false negative conservatively treated pelvic fractures not seen on CT but diagnosed on MRI. On a per-patient basis, CT had an overall sensitivity of 88% (22/25; 95% confidence intervals 69–97%), specificity of 98% (48/49; 95% confidence intervals 89–100%), and negative predictive value of 94%. For the five operative proximal femoral fractures, the sensitivity of CT was 60% (3/5; 95% confidence intervals 15–95%), specificity was 99% (68/69; 95% confidence intervals 92–100%), and negative predictive value was 97%.
In the clinical setting of suspected occult fracture, the sensitivity of clinical CT reports for detection of any type of fracture of the proximal femur, pelvis, or sacrum was 88%. For the small number of operatively treated proximal femoral fractures seen in the study, sensitivity of CT was 60% (3/5) and negative predictive value was 97%, although the relatively few patients needing fixation precludes statistical analysis.
KeywordsOccult fracture Hip fracture Computed tomography Pelvic fracture Sacral fracture
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 2.Ly TV, Swiontkowski MF (2014) Chapter 54: Intracapsular hip fractures. In: Browner BD, Jupiter JB, Krettek C, Anderson PA (eds) Skeletal trauma: basic science, management, and reconstruction, 5th edn. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 1607–1681.e12Google Scholar
- 3.Evans PD, Wilson C, Lyons K (1994) Comparison of MRI with bone scanning for suspected hip fracture in elderly patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 76(1):158–159Google Scholar
- 4.Dominguez S, Liu P, Roberts C, Mandell M, Richman PB (2005) Prevalence of traumatic hip and pelvic fractures in patients with suspected hip fracture and negative initial standard radiographs—a study of emergency department patients. Acad Emerg Med 12(4):366–369. https://doi.org/10.1197/j.aem.2004.10.024 PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 11.Oka M, Monu JUV (2004) Prevalence and patterns of occult hip fractures and mimics revealed by MRI. Am J Roentgenol 182(2):283–288. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.182.2.1820283
- 16.Kellock TT, Nicolaou S, Kim SSY, al-Busaidi S, Louis LJ, O’Connell TW, Ouellette HA, McLaughlin PD (2017) Detection of bone marrow edema in nondisplaced hip fractures: utility of a virtual noncalcium dual-energy CT application. Radiology 284(3):798–805. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2017161063 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 30.Dunker D, Collin D, Göthlin JH, Geijer M (2012) High clinical utility of computed tomography compared to radiography in elderly patients with occult hip fracture after low-energy trauma. Emerg Radiol. 19(2):135–9Google Scholar