Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Distracting injury defined: does an isolated hip fracture constitute a distracting injury for clearance of the cervical spine?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Emergency Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

As the population within the USA ages, the number of hip fractures seen yearly in the emergency department is expected to rise. According to the NEXUS criteria, many of these patients receive computerized tomographic scan (CT) evaluation of the cervical spine because a hip fracture may constitute a distracting injury. The objective of this study is to determine if an isolated hip fracture constitutes a distracting injury which requires imaging of the cervical spine.

Methods

Data were prospectively collected on 158 trauma patients with isolated hip fractures between April 1, 2015 and March 9, 2016. Patient demographics were analyzed and compared to the National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study (NEXUS).

Results

Patients with isolated hip fractures were predominantly elderly, on average 78.6 +/− 15.9 years old, and 94.3% of these injuries occurred after a fall from standing. Only one patient also had a cervical spine fracture which was not clinically significant. When compared to the established rate of cervical spine injury of 2.4%, the absolute risk reduction (ARR) was 0.35% (95% CI, − 1.06 to 1.75%) and the number needed to treat (NNT) was 290.

Conclusion

In the case of an elderly patient with an isolated hip fracture and no cervical midline tenderness, cervical spine imaging may be reserved for those who have other NEXUS criteria for further workup.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stevens JA, Rudd RA (2013) The impact of decreasing U.S. hip fracture rates on future hip fracture estimates. Osteoporos Int 24:2725–2728

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Baker PN, Salar O, Ollivere BJ et al (2014) Evolution of the hip fracture population: time to consider the future? A retrospective observational analysis. BMJ Open 4(4):e004405. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004405

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Boland LL, Satterlee PA, Jansen P (2014) Cervical spine fractures in elderly patients with hip fracture after low-level fall: an opportunity to refine prehospital spinal immobilization guidelines? Prehosp Disaster Med 29(1):96–99. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049023X14000041

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hoffman JR, Mower WR, Wolfson AB, Todd KH, Zucker M (2000) Validity of a set of clinical criteria to rule out injury to the cervical spine in patients with blunt trauma. National Emergency X-radiography utilization study group. N Engl J Med 343(2):94–99

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hoffman JR, Wolfson AB, Todd K, Mower W (1998) Selective cervical spine radiography in blunt trauma: methodology of the National Emergency X-radiography utilization study (NEXUS). Ann Emerg Med 32(4):461–469

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chang CH, Holmes JF, Mower WRPE (2005) Distracting injuries in patients with vertebral injuries. J Emerg Med 28(2):147–152

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ullrich A, Hendey GW, Geiderman J, Shaw SG, Hoffman J, Mower W (2001) Distracting painful injuries associated with cervical spinal injuries in blunt trauma. Acad Emerg Med 8(1):25–29

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Heffernan DS, Schermer CR, Lu S (2005) What defines a distracting injury in cervical spine assessment? J Trauma 59(6):1396–1399

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bouhassira D, Le Bars D, Villanueva L (1987) Heterotopic activation of A delta and C fibres triggers inhibition of trigeminal and spinal convergent neurones in the rat. J Physiol 389:301–317

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Gonzalez RP, Fried PO, Bukhalo M, Holevar MR, Falimirski M (1999) Role of clinical examination in screening for blunt cervical spine injury. J Am Coll Surg 189:152–157

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Velmahos GC, Theodorou D, Tatevossian R, Belzberg H, Cornwell EE 3rd, Berne TV, Asensio JADD (1996) Radiographic cervical spine evaluation in the alert asymptomatic blunt trauma victim: much ado about nothing. J Trauma 40(5):768–774

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Stiell IG, Wells GA, Vandemheen KL, Clement CM, Lesiuk H, De Maio VJ, Laupacis A, Schull M, McKnight RD, Verbeek R, Brison R, Cass D, Dreyer J, Eisenhauer MA, Greenberg GH, MacPhail I, Morrison L, Reardon MWJ (2001) The Canadian C-spine rule for radiography in alert and stable trauma patients. JAMA 286(15):1841–1848

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Goode T, Young A, Wilson SP, Katzen J, Wolfe LG, Duane T (2014) Evaluation of cervical spine fracture in the elderly: can we trust our physical examination? Am Surg 80(2):182–184

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Morrison J, Jeanmonod R (2014) Imaging in the NEXUS-negative patient: when we break the rule. Am J Emerg Med 32(1):67–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2013.08.062

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Collins NC, McKenzie J (2013) The NEXUS criteria: do they stand the test of time? Eur J Emerg Med 20(1):58–60. https://doi.org/10.1097/MEJ.0b013e32834fe94a

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Denver D, Shetty A, Unwin D (2015) Falls and implementation of NEXUS in the elderly (the FINE study). J Emerg Med 49(3):294–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2015.03.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Roberge RJ, Samuels J (1999) Cervical spine injury in low-impact blunt trauma. Am J Emerg Med 17(2):125–129

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Korhonen N, Kannus P, Niemi S, Parkkari J, Sievänen H (2014) Rapid increase in fall-induced cervical spine injuries among older Finnish adults between 1970 and 2011. Age Ageing 43(4):567–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afu060

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. North Carolina Industrial Commission (2015) CPT Codes and Fees http://www.ic.nc.gov/ncic/pages/70000.htm Accessed 23 July 2017

  20. Keysor K (2017) 2017 Medicare physician fee schedule Prorposed rule. https://www.ACR.Org/~/media/ACR/documents/PDF/economics/Medicare/2016%20MPFS/impact%20Table%2070000%20codes2016%20MPFS.pdf. Accessed 23 July 2017

  21. Missouri Department of Social Services (2016) Outpatient Hospital Radiology Fee Schedule www.dss.mo.gov/mhd/providers/files/outpatient-hospital-radiology-fee-schedule.xlsx Accessed 24 July 2017

  22. Sparrow (2017) Sparrow Patient Financial Services- Pricing https://www.sparrow.org/upload/docs/MySparrow/Radiology%20Pricing.pdf Accessed 23 July 2017

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, New York Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital, 506 Sixth Street, Brooklyn, NY, 11215, USA

    Ryan Lindborg, Amani Jambhekar, Vincent Chan, Daniel Laskey, James Rucinski & Bashar Fahoum

Authors
  1. Ryan Lindborg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Amani Jambhekar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Vincent Chan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Daniel Laskey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. James Rucinski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Bashar Fahoum
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ryan Lindborg.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lindborg, R., Jambhekar, A., Chan, V. et al. Distracting injury defined: does an isolated hip fracture constitute a distracting injury for clearance of the cervical spine?. Emerg Radiol 25, 35–39 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-017-1555-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-017-1555-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation