Emergency Radiology

, Volume 22, Issue 1, pp 31–42 | Cite as

Utility of CT after sonography for suspected appendicitis in children: integration of a clinical scoring system with a staged imaging protocol

  • Abhay Srinivasan
  • Sabah Servaes
  • Andrès Peña
  • Kassa Darge
Original Article

Abstract

To improve diagnosis of pediatric appendicitis, many institutions have implemented a staged imaging protocol utilizing ultrasonography (US) first and then computed tomography (CT). A substantial number of children with suspected appendicitis undergo CT after US, and the efficient and accurate diagnosis of pediatric appendicitis continues to be challenging. The objective of the study is to characterize the utility of CT following US for diagnosis of pediatric appendicitis, in conjunction with a clinical appendicitis score (AS). Imaging studies of children with suspected appendicitis who underwent CT after US in an imaging protocol were retrospectively reviewed by three radiologists in consensus. Chart review derived the AS (range 0–10) and obtained the patient diagnosis and disposition, and an AS was applied to each patient. Clinical and radiologic data were analyzed to assess the yield of CT after US. Studies of 211 children (mean age 11.3 years) were included. The positive threshold for AS was determined to be 6 out of 10. When AS and US were concordant (N = 140), the sensitivity and specificity of US were similar to CT. When AS and US were discordant (N = 71) and also when AS ≥ 6 (N = 84), subsequent CT showed superior sensitivity and specificity to US alone. In the subset where US showed neither the appendix nor inflammatory change in the right lower quadrant (126/211, 60 % of scans), when AS < 6 (N = 83), the negative predictive value (NPV) of US was 0.98. However, when AS ≥ 6 (N = 43), NPV of US was 0.58, and the positive predictive value of subsequent CT was 1. There was a significant decrease in depiction of the appendix on US with patient weight-to-age ratio of >6 (kg/year, P < 0.001) and after-hours (1700 –0730 hours) performance of US (P < 0.001). Results suggest that the appendicitis score has utility in guiding an imaging protocol and support the contention that non-visualization of the appendix on US is not intrinsically non-diagnostic. There was little benefit to additional CT when AS < 6 and US did not show the appendix or evidence of inflammation; this would have avoided CT in 140/211 (66 %) patients. CT demonstrated benefit when AS ≥ 6, suggesting that cases with AS ≥ 6 and features that limit depiction of the appendix on US may be triaged to CT.

Keywords

Appendicitis Pediatric Computed tomography (CT) Ultrasonography (US) Score 

Notes

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Lund DP (2008) Appendicitis. In: Kleinman R, Goulet O, Mieli-Vergani G, Sanderson I, Sherman P, Shneider B (eds) Walker’s pediatric gastrointestinal disease, 5th edn. BC Decker, Hamilton, p 353Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Taylor GA (2004) Suspected appendicitis is children: in search of the single best diagnostic test. Radiology 231:293–295PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Strouse PJ (2010) Pediatric appendicitis: an argument for US. Radiology 255:8–13PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kwok MY, Kim MK, Gorelick MH (2004) Evidenced-based approach to the diagnosis of appendicitis in children. Pediatr Emerg Care 20:690–698PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brennan GDG (2006) Pediatric appendicitis: pathophysiology and appropriate use of diagnostic imaging. Can J Emerg Med 8:425–432Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rosendahl K, Aukland SM, Fosse K (2004) Imaging strategies in children with suspected appendicitis. Eur Radiol 14(Suppl 4):L138–L145PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Flum DR, Koepsell T (2002) The clinical and economic correlates of misdiagnosed appendicitis: nationwide analysis. Arch Surg 137:799–804PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Margenthaler JA, Longo WE, Virgo KS et al (2003) Risk factors for adverse outcome after surgical treatment of appendicitis in adults. Ann Surg 238:59–66PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    van den Broek WT, van der Ende ED, Bijnen AB, Breslau PJ, Gouma DJ (2004) Which children could benefit from additional diagnostic tools in case of suspected appendicitis? J Pediatr Surg 39:570–574PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hagendorf BA, Clarke JR, Burd RS (2004) The optimal initial management of chlldren with suspected appendicitis: a decision analysis. J Pediatr Surg 39:880–885PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Smink DS, Finkelstein JA, Garcia Peña BM, Shannon MW, Taylor GA, Fishman SJ (2004) Diagnosis of acute appendicitis in children using a clinical practice guideline. J Pediatr Surg 39:458–463PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Garcia Peña BM, Taylor GA (2000) Radiologists’ confidence in interpretaton of sonography and CT in suspected pediatric appendicitis. AJR 175:71–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Alvarado A (1986) A practical score for the early diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Ann Emerg Med 15:557–564PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kharbanda AB, Taylor GA, Fishman SJ, Bachur RG (2005) A clinical decision rule to identify children at low risk for appendicitis. Pediatrics 116:709–716PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Samuel M (2002) Pediatric appendicitis score. J Pediatr Surg 37:877–881PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Goldman RD, Carter S, Stephens D, Antoon R, Mounstephen W, Langer JC (2008) Prospective validation of the pediatric appendicitis score. J Pediatr 153:278–282PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bhatt M, Joseph L, Ducharme FM, Dougherty G, McGillivray D (2009) Prospective validation of the pediatric appendicitis score in a Canadian pediatric emergency department. Acad Emerg Med 16:591–596PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Doria AS (2009) Optimizing the role of imaging in appendicitis. Pediatr Radiol 39(Suppl 2):S144–S148PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rubin SZ, Martin DJ (1990) Ultrasonography in the management of possible appendicitis in childhood. J Pediatr Surg 25:737–740PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Larson DB, Johnson LW, Schnell BM, Goske MJ, Salisbury SR, Forman HP (2011) Rising use of CT in child visits to the emergency department in the United States, 1995–2008. Radiology 259:793–801PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Martin AE, Vollman D, Adler B, Caniano DA (2004) CT scans may not reduce the negative appendectomy rate in children. J Pediatr Surg 39:886–890PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wong KK, Cheung W, Tam PK (2008) Diagnosing acute appendicitis: are we overusing radiologic investigations? J Pediatr Surg 43:2239–2241PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bachur RG, Hennelly K, Callahan MJ, Monuteaux MC (2012) Advanced radiologic imaging for pediatric appendicitis, 2005–2009: trends and outcomes. J Pediatr 160:1034–1038PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Miglioretti DL, Johnson E, Williams A et al (2013) The use of computed tomography in pediatrics and the associated radiation exposure and estimated cancer risk. JAMA Pediatr 167:700–707PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Partrick DA, Janik JE, Janik JS, Bensard DD, Karrer FM (2003) Increased CT scan utilization does not improve the diagnostic accuracy of appendicitis in children. J Pediatr Surg 38:659–662PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Doria AS, Moineddin R, Kellenberger CJ et al (2006) US or CT for diagnosis of appendicitis in children and adults? A meta-analysis. Radiology 241:93–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Brenner D, Elliston C, Hall E, Berdon W (2001) Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR 176:289–296PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Brenner DJ, Hall EJ (2007) Computed tomography-an increasing source of radiation exposure. NEJM 357:2277–2284PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mathews JD, Forsythe AV, Brady Z et al (2013) Cancer risk in 680,000 people exposed to computed tomography scans in childhood or adolescence: data linkage study of 11 million Australians. BMJ 346:f2360PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wan MJ, Krahn M, Ungar WJ et al (2009) Acute appendiciits in young children: cost-effectiveness of US versus CT in diagnosis—a Markov decision analytic model. Radiology 250:378–386PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Safran DB, Pilati D, Folz E, Oller D (2001) Is appendiceal CT scan overused for evaluating patients with right lower quadrant pain? Am J Emerg Med 19:199–203PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    York D, Smith A, Phillips JD, von Allmen D (2005) The influence of advanced radiographic imaging on the treatment of pediatric appendicitis. J Pediatr Surg 40:1908–1911PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Karakas SP, Guelfguat M, Leonidas JC, Springer S, Singh SP (2000) Acute appendicitis in children: comparison of clinical diagnosis with ultrasound and CT imaging. Pediatr Radiol 30:94–98PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Garcia Peña BM, Mandl KD, Kraus SJ et al (1999) Ultrasonography and limited computed tomography in the diagnosis and management of appendicitis in children. JAMA 282:1041–1046PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ramarajan N, Krishnamoorthy R, Barth R et al (2009) An interdisciplinary initiative to reduce radiation exposure: evaluation of appendicitis in a pediatric emergency department with clinical assessment supported by a staged ultrasound and computed tomography pathway. Acad Emerg Med 16:1258–1265PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Adibe OO, Amin SR, Hansen EN et al (2011) An evidence-based clinical protocol for diagnosis of acute appendicitis decreased the use of computed tomography in children. J Pediatr Surg 46:192–196PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Warner BW, Kulick RM, Stoops MM, Mehta S, Stephan M, Kotagal UR (1998) An evidenced-based clinical pathway for acute appendicitis decreases hospital duration and cost. J Pediatr Surg 33:1371–1375PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Garcia Peña BM, Taylor GA, Fishman SJ, Mandl KD (2002) Effect of an imaging protocol on clinical outcomes among pediatric patients with appendicitis. Pediatrics 110:1088–1093CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Krishnamoorthi R, Ramarajan N, Wang NE et al (2011) Effectiveness of a staged US and CT protocol for the diagnosis of pediatric appendicitis: reducing radiation exposure in the age of ALARA. Radiology 259:231–239PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Hennelly KE, Bachur R (2011) Appendicitis update. Curr Opin Pediatr 23:281–285PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Hernandez JA, Swischuk LE, Angel CA, Chung D, Chandler R, Lee S (2005) Imaging of acute appendicitis: US as the primary imaging modality. Pediatr Radiol 35:392–395PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Gaitini D (2011) Imaging acute appendicitis: state of the art. J Clin Imaging Sci 1:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Kaiser S, Freckner B, Jorulf HK (2002) Suspected appendicitis in children: US and CT-a prospective randomized study. Radiology 223:633–638PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    van Breda Vriesman AC, Kole BJ, Puylaert JBCM (2003) Effect of ultrasonography and optional computed tomography on the outcome of appendectomy. Eur Radiol 13:2278–2282PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    The American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® right lower quadrant pain—suspected appendicitis. National Guideline Clearinghouse. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, US Dept. of Health and Human Services. http://www.guidelines.gov/content.aspx?id=23816. Accessed 24 January 2012
  46. 46.
    Amercian College of Emergency Physicians. Clinical policy: critical issues in the evaluation and management of emergency department patients with suspected appendicitis. National Guideline Clearinghouse. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, US Dept. of Health and Human Services. http://www.guidelines.gov/content.aspx?id=15598. Accessed 24 January 2012
  47. 47.
    Puylaert JBCM (1986) Acute appendicitis: US evaluation using graded compression. Radiology 158:355–360PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Jeffrey RB, Laing FC, Townsend RR (1988) Acute appendicitis: sonographic criteria based on 250 cases. Radiology 167:327–329PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Gaitini D, Beck-Razi N, Mor-Yosef D et al (2008) Diagnosing acute appendicitis in adults: accuracy of color doppler sonography and MDCT compared with surgery and clinical follow-up. AJR 190:1300–1305PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Lim HK, Lee WJ, Kim TH, Namgung S, Lee SJ, Lim JH (1996) Appendicitis: usefulness of color Doppler US. Radiology 201:221–225PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Rodriguez DP, Vargas S, Callahan MJ, Zurakowski D, Taylor GA (2006) Appendicitis in young children: imaging experience and clinical outcomes. AJR 186:1158–1164PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Curtin KR, Fitzgerald SW, Nemcek AA Jr, Hoff FL, Vogelzang RL (1995) CT diagnosis of acute appendicitis: imaging findings. AJR 164:905–909PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Lund DP (2008) Appendicitis. In: Kleinman R, Goulet O, Mieli-Vergani G, Sanderson I, Sherman P, Shneider B (eds) Walker’s pediatric gastrointestinal disease, 5th edn. BC Decker, Hamilton, p 357Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Schneider C, Kharbanda A, Bachur R (2007) Evaluating appendicitis scoring systems using a prospective pediatric cohort. Ann Emerg Med 49:778–784PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Stephens PL, Mazzucco JJ (1999) Comparison of ultrasound and the Alvarado score for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Conn Med 63:137–140PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Galindo Gallego M, Fadrique B, Nieto MA et al (1998) Evaluation of ultrasonography and clinical diagnostic scoring in suspected appendicits. Br J Surg 85:37–40PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Garcia Peña BM, Cook EF, Mandl KD (2004) Selective imaging strategies for the diagnosis of appendicitis is children. Pediatrics 113:24–28PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Pacharn P, Ying J, Linam LE, Brody AS, Babcock DS (2010) Sonography in the evaluation of acute appendicitis: are negative sonographic findings good enough? J Ultrasound Med 29:1749–1755PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Schuh S, Man C, Cheng A et al (2011) Predictors of non-diagnostic ultrasound scanning in children with suspected acute appendicits. J Pediatr 158:112–118PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Doria AS, Amernic H, Dick P et al (2005) Cost-effectiveness analysis of weekday and weeknight or weekend shiffts for assessment of appendicitis. Pediatr Radiol 35:1186–1195PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Butler M, Servaes S, Srinivasan A, Edgar JC, Del Pozo G, Darge K (2011) US depiction of the appendix: role of abdominal wall thickness and appendiceal location. Emerg Radiol 18:525–531PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Acheson J, Banerjee J (2011) Management of suspected appendicitis in children. Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed 95:9–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Douglas CD, Macpherson NE, Davidson PM, Gani JS (2000) Randomised controlled trial of ultrasonography in diagnosis of acute appendicitis, incorporating the Alvarado score. BMJ 321:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Tzanakis NE, Efstathiou SP, Danulidis K et al (2005) A new approach to accurate diagnosis of acute appendicitis. World J Surg 29:1151–1157PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Kwan KY, Nager AL (2010) Diagnosing pediatric appendicitis: usefulness of laboratory markers. Am J Emerg Med 28:1009–1015PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Kim HC, Yang DM, Lee CM et al (2011) Acute appendicitis: relationships between CT-determined severities and serum white blood cell counts and C-reactive protein levels. Br J Radiol 84:1115–1120PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Pruekprasert P, Maipang T, Geater A, Apakupakul N, Ksuntigij P (2004) Accuracy in diagnosis of acute appendicitis by computing serum C-reactive protein measurements, Alvarado score, and clinical impression of surgeons. J Med Assoc Thail 87:296–303Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Wu HP, Chen CY, Kuo IT, Wu YK, Fu YC (2012) Diagnostic values of a single serum biomarker at different tiime points compared with Alvarado score and imaging examinations in pediatric appendicitis. J Surg Res 174:272–277PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Rice HE, Arbesman M, Martin DJ et al (1999) Does early ultrasonography affect management of pediatric appendicitis? A prospective analysis. J Pediatr Surg 34:754–759PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Frush DP, Frush KS, Oldham KT (2009) Imaging of acute appendicitis in children: EU versus U.S....or US versus CT? A North American perspective. Pediatr Radiol 39:500–505PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Jahn H, Mathiesen FK, Neckelmann K, Hovendal CP, Bellstrøm T, Gottrup F (1997) Comparison of clinical judgment and diagnostic ultrasonography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: experience with a score-aided diagnosis. Eur J Surg 163:433–443PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Saidi RF, Ghasemi M (2000) Role of Alvarado score in diagnosis and treatment of suspected acute appendicitis. Am J Emerg Med 18:230–231PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Neff LP, Ladd MR, Becher RD et al (2011) Computerized tomography utilization in children with appendicitis-differences in referring and children's hospitals. Am Surg 77:1061–1065PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Fryback DG, Thronbury JR (1991) The efficacy of diagnostic imaging. Med Decis Making 11:88–94PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Bankier AA, Levine D, Halpern EF, Kressel HY (2010) Consensus interpretation in imaging research: is there a better way? Radiology 257:14–17PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Newman K, Ponsky T, Kittle K et al (2003) Appendicitis 2000: variability in practice, outcomes, and resource utilization at thirty pediatric hospitals. J Pediatr Surg 38:372–379PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Am Soc Emergency Radiol 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Abhay Srinivasan
    • 1
  • Sabah Servaes
    • 1
    • 2
  • Andrès Peña
    • 1
  • Kassa Darge
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of RadiologyThe Children’s Hospital of PhiladelphiaPhiladelphiaUSA
  2. 2.Perelman School of MedicineUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations