Emergency Radiology

, Volume 21, Issue 2, pp 133–141

The yield of CT pulmonary angiograms to exclude acute pulmonary embolism

  • Andreu F. Costa
  • Hamed Basseri
  • Adnan Sheikh
  • Ian Stiell
  • Carole Dennie
Original Article

Abstract

There is accumulating evidence regarding the overuse of computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) to exclude pulmonary embolism (PE). We evaluated the yield of CTPA studies performed at our tertiary care hospital between April 2008 and March 2010 for emergency patients (ED), inpatients (INPT), and intensive care unit inpatients (ICU). For each patient group, we also compared CTPA positivity rates among the following: daytime and on-call studies, 1 year before and after institution of an Emergency Radiology division, interpreting thoracic and non-thoracic radiologists, and individual emergency physicians. Patients with a history of PE and indeterminate studies were excluded. The diagnosis of PE was based on the radiology report. D-dimer values obtained within 24 h prior to CTPA were recorded. A total of 3,571/4,757 CTPA studies satisfied the inclusion criteria. The fraction of positive studies was 252/1,677 (15.0 %) ED, 255/1,548 (16.5 %) INPT, and 62/346 (17.9 %) ICU. There was no difference in yield between patient groups, daytime vs. on-call studies, before vs. after instituting an emergency radiology division, and thoracic vs. non-thoracic radiologists (p > 0.05). For individual emergency physicians, the mean CTPA positivity rate was 15.4 % but varied considerably (σ = 8.5 %, range, 0–38.5 %). In comparison to other recent studies, our yield of ED CTPA is relatively high but varied widely among individual emergency physicians. While the reasons for such differences require further investigation, our results reinforce the importance of a strong clinical assessment in the work-up of suspected PE.

Keywords

Computed tomography pulmonary angiography Pulmonary embolism Emergency medicine D-dimer 

References

  1. 1.
    van Belle A, Buller HR, Huisman MV, Huisman PM, Kaasjager K, Kamphuisen PW, Kramer MH, Kruip MJ, Kwakkel-van Erp JM, Leebeek FW, Nijkeuter M, Prins MH, Sohne M, Tick LW (2006) Effectiveness of managing suspected pulmonary embolism using an algorithm combining clinical probability, D-dimer testing, and computed tomography. JAMA 295(2):172–179. doi:10.1001/jama.295.2.172 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Perrier A, Roy PM, Sanchez O, Le Gal G, Meyer G, Gourdier AL, Furber A, Revel MP, Howarth N, Davido A, Bounameaux H (2005) Multidetector-row computed tomography in suspected pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med 352(17):1760–1768. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa042905 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kavanagh EC, O'Hare A, Hargaden G, Murray JG (2004) Risk of pulmonary embolism after negative MDCT pulmonary angiography findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 182(2):499–504PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Quiroz R, Kucher N, Zou KH, Kipfmueller F, Costello P, Goldhaber SZ, Schoepf UJ (2005) Clinical validity of a negative computed tomography scan in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a systematic review. JAMA 293(16):2012–2017. doi:10.1001/jama.293.16.2012 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Moores LK, Jackson WL Jr, Shorr AF, Jackson JL (2004) Meta-analysis: outcomes in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism managed with computed tomographic pulmonary angiography. Ann Intern Med 141(11):866–874PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Anderson DR, Kahn SR, Rodger MA, Kovacs MJ, Morris T, Hirsch A, Lang E, Stiell I, Kovacs G, Dreyer J, Dennie C, Cartier Y, Barnes D, Burton E, Pleasance S, Skedgel C, O'Rouke K, Wells PS (2007) Computed tomographic pulmonary angiography vs ventilation-perfusion lung scanning in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 298(23):2743–2753. doi:10.1001/jama.298.23.2743 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Glassroth J (2007) Imaging of pulmonary embolism: too much of a good thing? JAMA 298(23):2788–2789. doi:10.1001/jama.298.23.2788 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wiener RS, Schwartz LM, Woloshin S (2011) Time trends in pulmonary embolism in the United States: evidence of overdiagnosis. Arch Intern Med 171(9):831–837. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2011.178 PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Burge AJ, Freeman KD, Klapper PJ, Haramati LB (2008) Increased diagnosis of pulmonary embolism without a corresponding decline in mortality during the CT era. Clin Radiol 63(4):381–386. doi:10.1016/j.crad.2007.10.004 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sheh SH, Bellin E, Freeman KD, Haramati LB (2012) Pulmonary embolism diagnosis and mortality with pulmonary CT angiography versus ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy: evidence of overdiagnosis with CT? AJR Am J Roentgenol 198(6):1340–1345. doi:10.2214/AJR.11.6426 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Brunot S, Corneloup O, Latrabe V, Montaudon M, Laurent F (2005) Reproducibility of multi-detector spiral computed tomography in detection of sub-segmental acute pulmonary embolism. Eur Radiol 15(10):2057–2063PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ghanima W, Nielssen BE, Holmen LO, Witwit A, Al-Ashtari A, Sandset PM (2007) Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: interobserver agreement among radiologists with varied levels of experience. Acta Radiol 48(2):165–170PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Costantino G, Norsa AH, Amadori R, Ippolito S, Resta F, Bianco R, Casazza G, Biagiotti S, Rusconi AM, Montano N (2009) Interobserver agreement in the interpretation of computed tomography in acute pulmonary embolism. Am J Emerg Med 27(9):1109–1111PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pena E, Kimpton M, Dennie C, Peterson R, Le Gal G, Carrier M (2012) Difference in interpretation of computed tomography pulmonary angiography diagnosis of sub-segmental thrombosis in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. J Thromb Haemost 10(3):496–498. doi:10.1111/j.1538-7836.2011.04612.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hall WB, Truitt SG, Scheunemann LP, Shah SA, Rivera MP, Parker LA, Carson SS (2009) The prevalence of clinically relevant incidental findings on chest computed tomographic angiograms ordered to diagnose pulmonary embolism. Arch Intern Med 169(21):1961–1965. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2009.360 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kline JA, Courtney DM, Beam DM, King MC, Steuerwald M (2009) Incidence and predictors of repeated computed tomographic pulmonary angiography in emergency department patients. Ann Emerg Med 54(1):41–48. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.08.015 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Costantino MM, Randall G, Gosselin M, Brandt M, Spinning K, Vegas CD (2008) CT angiography in the evaluation of acute pulmonary embolus. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191(2):471–474. doi:10.2214/AJR.07.2552 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Corwin MT, Donohoo JH, Partridge R, Egglin TK, Mayo-Smith WW (2009) Do emergency physicians use serum D-dimer effectively to determine the need for CT when evaluating patients for pulmonary embolism? Review of 5,344 consecutive patients. Am J Roentgenol 192(5):1319–1323. doi:10.2214/Ajr.08.1346 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Prologo JD, Gilkeson RC, Diaz M, Asaad J (2004) CT pulmonary angiography: a comparative analysis of the utilization patterns in emergency department and hospitalized patients between 1998 and 2003. AJR Am J Roentgenol 183(4):1093–1096PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Weiss CR, Haponik EF, Diette GB, Merriman B, Scatarige JC, Fishman EK (2008) Pretest risk assessment in suspected acute pulmonary embolism. Acad Radiol 15(1):3–14. doi:10.1016/j.acra.2007.07.019 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mamlouk MD, vanSonnenberg E, Gosalia R, Drachman D, Gridley D, Zamora JG, Casola G, Ornstein S (2010) Pulmonary embolism at CT angiography: implications for appropriateness, cost, and radiation exposure in 2003 patients. Radiology 256(2):625–632. doi:10.1148/radiol.10091624 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pistolesi M (2010) Pulmonary CT angiography in patients suspected of having pulmonary embolism: case finding or screening procedure? Radiology 256(2):334–337. doi:10.1148/radiol.10100662 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Brown MD, Vance SJ, Kline JA (2005) An emergency department guideline for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: an outcome study. Acad Emerg Med 12(1):20–25. doi:10.1197/j.aem.2004.08.046 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Runyon MS, Richman PB, Kline JA (2007) Emergency medicine practitioner knowledge and use of decision rules for the evaluation of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: variations by practice setting and training level. Acad Emerg Med 14(1):53–57. doi:10.1197/j.aem.2006.07.032 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Yin F, Wilson T, Della Fave A, Larsen M, Yoon J, Nugusie B, Freeland H, Chow RD (2012) Inappropriate use of D-dimer assay and pulmonary CT angiography in the evaluation of suspected acute pulmonary embolism. Am J Med Qual 27(1):74–79. doi:10.1177/1062860611407907 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wells PS, Anderson DR, Rodger M, Ginsberg JS, Kearon C, Gent M, Turpie AG, Bormanis J, Weitz J, Chamberlain M, Bowie D, Barnes D, Hirsh J (2000) Derivation of a simple clinical model to categorize patients probability of pulmonary embolism: increasing the models utility with the SimpliRED D-dimer. Thromb Haemost 83(3):416–420PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wells PS, Anderson DR, Rodger M, Stiell I, Dreyer JF, Barnes D, Forgie M, Kovacs G, Ward J, Kovacs MJ (2001) Excluding pulmonary embolism at the bedside without diagnostic imaging: management of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism presenting to the emergency department by using a simple clinical model and D-dimer. Ann Intern Med 135(2):98–107PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Remy-Jardin M, Pistolesi M, Goodman LR, Gefter WB, Gottschalk A, Mayo JR, Sostman HD (2007) Management of suspected acute pulmonary embolism in the era of CT angiography: a statement from the Fleischner Society. Radiology 245(2):315–329. doi:10.1148/radiol.2452070397 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Stein PD, Woodard PK, Weg JG, Wakefield TW, Tapson VF, Sostman HD, Sos TA, Quinn DA, Leeper KV Jr, Hull RD, Hales CA, Gottschalk A, Goodman LR, Fowler SE, Buckley JD (2007) Diagnostic pathways in acute pulmonary embolism: recommendations of the PIOPED II Investigators. Radiology 242(1):15–21. doi:10.1148/radiol.2421060971 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Schattner A (2009) Computed tomographic pulmonary angiography to diagnose acute pulmonary embolism: the good, the bad, and the ugly: comment on "The prevalence of clinically relevant incidental findings on chest computed tomographic angiograms ordered to diagnose pulmonary embolism". Arch Intern Med 169(21):1966–1968. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2009.400 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Stein EG, Haramati LB, Chamarthy M, Sprayregen S, Davitt MM, Freeman LM (2010) Success of a safe and simple algorithm to reduce use of CT pulmonary angiography in the emergency department. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194(2):392–397. doi:10.2214/AJR.09.2499 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Stein PD, Fowler SE, Goodman LR, Gottschalk A, Hales CA, Hull RD, Leeper KV Jr, Popovich J Jr, Quinn DA, Sos TA, Sostman HD, Tapson VF, Wakefield TW, Weg JG, Woodard PK (2006) Multidetector computed tomography for acute pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med 354(22):2317–2327. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa052367 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Woo JK, Chiu RY, Thakur Y, Mayo JR (2012) Risk-benefit analysis of pulmonary CT angiography in patients with suspected pulmonary embolus. AJR Am J Roentgenol 198(6):1332–1339. doi:10.2214/AJR.10.6329 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Cervini P, Bell CM, Roberts HC, Provost YL, Chung TB, Paul NS (2008) Radiology resident interpretation of on-call CT pulmonary angiograms. Acad Radiol 15(5):556–562. doi:10.1016/j.acra.2007.12.007 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kline JA, Wells PS (2003) Methodology for a rapid protocol to rule out pulmonary embolism in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med 42(2):266–275PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Araoz PA, Haramati LB, Mayo JR, Barbosa EJ Jr, Rybicki FJ, Colletti PM (2012) Panel discussion: pulmonary embolism imaging and outcomes. AJR Am J Roentgenol 198(6):1313–1319. doi:10.2214/AJR.11.8461 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Abujudeh HH, Kaewlai R, Farsad K, Orr E, Gilman M, Shepard J-AO (2009) Computed tomography pulmonary angiography: an assessment of the radiology report. Acad Radiol 16(11):1309–1315PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Am Soc Emergency Radiol 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andreu F. Costa
    • 1
    • 2
  • Hamed Basseri
    • 2
  • Adnan Sheikh
    • 1
    • 2
  • Ian Stiell
    • 3
    • 4
  • Carole Dennie
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Medical ImagingThe Ottawa HospitalOttawaCanada
  2. 2.Department of Radiology, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of OttawaOttawaCanada
  3. 3.Department of Emergency MedicineThe Ottawa HospitalOttawaCanada
  4. 4.Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of OttawaOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations