Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

MDCT for suspected pulmonary embolism: multi-institutional survey of 16-MDCT data acquisition protocols

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Emergency Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the extent to which a consensus exists on multidetector row computed tomography (MDCT) protocol parameters for suspected pulmonary embolism (PE). In August of 2004, a questionnaire addressing a number of body MDCT protocols was mailed to 99 fellows of the Society of Computed Body Tomography, representing a total of 46 institutions. In May 2005, this was followed up with a second mailing. The survey requested details pertaining to protocols for the most advanced MDCT scanner in the department. The overall survey response rate of 37% (17/46) yielded 15 protocols for 16-MDCT imaging of suspected PE. This data was tabulated and revealed a consensus for the use of bolus tracking, rapid contrast infusion, caudo-cranial scanning, the narrowest detector row collimation, and thin (<2 mm) reconstruction sections. However, contrast infusion timing, contrast concentration, and implementation of radiation dose modulation were variable. This compilation of protocols reflects recently published studies advocating the use of narrow acquisition collimation and reconstruction sections for MDCT of suspected PE. Future studies are necessary to elucidate the optimal intravenous contrast infusion parameters and further assess the efficacy of reduced radiation dose protocols.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hunink MGM, Krestin GP (2002) Study design for concurrent development, assessment, and implementation of new diagnostic imaging technology. Radiology 222:604–614

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Raptopolous V, Boiselle PM (2001) Multi-detector row spiral CT pulmonary angiography: comparison with single-detector row spiral CT. Radiology 221:606–613

    Google Scholar 

  3. Boiselle PM, Hasegawa I, Nishino M, Raptopoulos V, Hatabu H (2005) Comparison of artifacts on coronal reformation and axial CT pulmonary angiography images using single-detector and 4- and 8-detector multidetector-row helical CT scanners. Acad Radiol 12:602–607

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Coche E, Verschuren F, Keyeux A et al (2003) Diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism in outpatients: comparison of thin-collimation multi-detector row spiral CT and planar ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy. Radiology 229:757–765

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Winer-Muram HT, Rydberg J, Johnson M et al (2004) Suspected acute pulmonary embolism: evaluation with multi-detector row CT versus digital subtraction arteriography. Radiology 233:806–815

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ghaye B, Szapiro D, Mastoro I et al (2001) Peripheral pulmonary arteries: how far in the lung does multi-detector row spiral CT allow analysis? Radiology 219:629–636

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Schoepf UJ, Holzknecht N, Helmberger TK, Crispin A, Hong C, Becker CR, Reiser MF (2002) Subsegmental pulmonary emboli: improved detection with thin-collimation multi-detector row spiral CT. Radiology 222:483–490

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Patel S, Kazerooni EA, Cascade PN (2003) Pulmonary embolism: optimization of small pulmonary artery visualization at multi-detector row CT. Radiology 227:455–460

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jeong YJ, Lee KS, Yoon YC, Kim TS, Chung MJ, Kim S (2004) Evaluation of small pulmonary arteries by 16- slice multidetector computed tomography: optimal slab thickness in condensing transaxial images converted into maximum intensity projection images. J Comput Assist Tomogr 28:195–203

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Prologo JD, Gilkeson RC, Diaz M, Cummings M (2005) The effect of single-detector CT versus MDCT on clinical outcomes in patients with suspected acute pulmonary embolism and negative results on CT pulmonary angiography. Am J Roentgenol 184:1231–1235

    Google Scholar 

  11. Perrier A, Roy P-M, Sanchez O et al (2005) Multidetector-row computed tomography in suspected pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med 352:1760–1768

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bedard JP, Blais C, Patenaude YG, Monga E (2005) Pulmonary embolism: prospective comparison of iso-osmolar and low-osmolarity nonionic contrast agents for contrast enhancement at CT angiography. Radiology 234:929–933

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Revel MP, Petrover D, Hernigou A, Lefort C, Meyer G, Frija G (2005) Diagnosing pulmonary embolism with four-detector row helical CT: prospective evaluation of 216 outpatients and inpatients. Radiology 234:265–273

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Schoellnast H, Deutschmann HA, Fritz GA, Stessel U, Schaffler GJ, Tillich M (2005) MDCT angiography of the pulmonary arteries: influence of iodine flow concentration on vessel attenuation and visualization. Am J Roentgenol 184:1935–1939

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tack D, De Maertelaer V, Petit W et al (2005) Multi-detector row CT pulmonary angiography: comparison of standard-dose and simulated low-dose techniques. Radiology 236:318–325

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kavanagh EC, O’Hare A, Hargaden G, Murray JG (2004) Risk of pulmonary embolism after negative MDCT pulmonary angiography findings. Am J Roentgenol 182:499–504

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Goodman LR, Gulsun M, Nagy P, Washington L (2005) CT of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: does iso-osmolar contrast agent improve vascular opacification. Radiology 234:923–928

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Heuschmid M, Mann C, Luz O, Mahnken AH, Reimann A, Claussen CD, Kopp AF (2006) Detection of pulmonary embolism using 16-slice multidetector-row computed tomography: evaluation of different image reconstruction parameters. J Comput Assist Tomogr 20:77–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kelly AM, Patel S, Carlos RC, Cronin P, Kazerooni EA (2006) Multidetector row CT pulmonary angiography and indirect venography for the diagnosis of venous thromboembolic disease in intensive care unit patients. Acad Radiol 13:486–495

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Nishino M, Kubo T, Kataoka ML, Gautam S, Raptopoulos V, Hatabu H (2006) Evaluation of pulmonary embolism using coronal reformations on 64-row multidetector-row computed tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 30:233–237

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Holmquist F, Nyman U (2006) Eighty-peak kilovoltage 16-channel multidetector computed tomography and reduced contrast-medium doses tailored to body weight to diagnose pulmonary embolism in azotaemic patients. Eur Radiol 16:1165–1176

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Henk CB, Grampp S, Linnau K, Thurnher MM, Czerny C, Herold CJ, Mostbeck GH (2003) Suspected pulmonary embolism: enhancement of pulmonary arteries at deep-inspiration CT angiography-influence of patent foramen ovale and atrial-septal defect. Radiology 226:749–755

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Eyer BA, Goodman LR, Washington L (2005) Clinicians’ response to radiologists’ reports of isolated subsegmental pulmonary embolism or inconclusive interpretation of pulmonary embolism using MDCT. Am J Roentgenol 184:623–628

    Google Scholar 

  24. Jones SE, Wittram C (2005) The indeterminate CT pulmonary angiogram: imaging characteristics and patient clinical outcome. Radiology 237:329–337

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Johnson PT, Rowell MR, Fishman EK (2006) Internet-based medical education: use of an “expert-corner” for disseminating radiologic information and determining users’ educational interests. Acad Radiol 13:273–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Rowell MR, Johnson PT, Fishman EK (2005) Radiology education in 2005: Internet practice patterns, perceptions and preferences of radiologists. In: Radiological Society of North America Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting Program. Radiological Society of North America, 2005, Oak Brook, IL, p 824

  27. Remy-Jardin M, Remy J, Artaud D, Deschildre F, Duhamel A (1997) Peripheral pulmonary arteries: optimization of the spiral CT acquisition protocol. Radiology 204:157–163

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kuzo R, Goodman LR (1997) CT evaluation of pulmonary embolism: technique and interpretation. Am J Roentgenol 169:959–965

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Schuster ME, Fishman JE, Copeland JF, Hatabu H, Boiselle PM (2003) Pulmonary embolism in pregnant patients: a survey of practices and policies for CT pulmonary angiography. Am J Roentgenol 181:1495–1498

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. O’Malley ME, Halpern E, Mueller PR, Gazelle GS (2000) Helical CT protocols for the abdomen and pelvis: a survey. Am J Roentgenol 175:109–113

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Barish MA, Soto, JA, Ferrucci JT (2005) Consensus on current clinical practice of virtual colonoscopy. Am J Roentgenol 184:786–792

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiologic Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, 601 N. Caroline Street, Room 3251, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA

    Pamela T. Johnson & Elliot K. Fishman

  2. Department of Radiology, New York University Medical Center, 560 1st Avenue, New York, NY, 10016, USA

    David Naidich

Authors
  1. Pamela T. Johnson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David Naidich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Elliot K. Fishman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elliot K. Fishman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Johnson, P.T., Naidich, D. & Fishman, E.K. MDCT for suspected pulmonary embolism: multi-institutional survey of 16-MDCT data acquisition protocols. Emerg Radiol 13, 243–249 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-006-0547-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-006-0547-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation