Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Multidetector-row computed tomography diagnosis of small bowel obstruction: can coronal reformations replace axial images?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Emergency Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Feasibility of diagnosing small bowel obstruction on multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) using coronal reformations alone is evaluated. Three radiologists with subspecialty training in abdominal imaging reviewed abdominopelvic CT of 67 patients in consensus. Thirty-four patients had surgically proven small bowel obstruction. The remaining 33 patients had CT for other reasons and had no intestinal obstruction. The images were displayed in either axial or coronal planes and were reviewed on separate days . Each CT was evaluated for the presence of small bowel obstruction and its etiology when applicable. Thirty-three (100%) of 33 patients were correctly diagnosed not to have intestinal obstruction on coronal images. Thirty-four (100%) of 34 patients were correctly diagnosed to have small bowel obstruction on both forms of image display. There were five patients where the final surgical diagnosis for the etiology of small bowel obstruction did not agree with the interpretation of either the coronal or axial images; however, in all five patients, the interpretations of axial and coronal images were similar. In only one patient, the etiology of small bowel obstruction based on the coronal images did not agree with that of axial images and the surgical result; however, the site of small bowel obstruction was correctly diagnosed. There were approximately 20% fewer images in the coronal reformation data set, and the radiologists found review of these images to be easier for localizing the zone of transition in small bowel obstruction. Very high diagnostic accuracy can be achieved based on coronal reformations alone, and this form of image display may potentially be substituted for the conventional axial images. Since there are fewer images to review when the studies are displayed in coronal plane, this may positively impact radiologist workflow.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Suh RS, Maglinte DDT, Lavonas EJ et al (1995) Emergency abdominal radiography: discrepancies of preliminary and final interpretation and management relevance. Emerg Radiol 2:1–4

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. McFadden DW, Zinner MJ (1994) Manifestations of gastrointestinal disease. In: Schwartz SI, Shires GT, Spencer FC (eds) Principles of surgery. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 1015–1042

    Google Scholar 

  3. Megibow AJ, Balthazar EJ, Cho KC, Medwid SW, Birnbaum BA, Noz ME (1991) Bowel obstruction: evaluation with CT. Radiology 180:313–318

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Fukuya T, Hawes DR, Lu CC, Chang PJ, Barloon TJ (1992) CT diagnosis of small-bowel obstruction: efficacy in 60 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 158:765–769

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Furukawa A, Yamasaki M, Furuichi K et al (2001) Helical CT in the diagnosis of small bowel obstruction. Radiographics 21:341–355

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Maglinte DT, Reyes BL, Harmon BH et al (1996) Reliability and role of plain film radiography and CT in the diagnosis of small-bowel obstruction. AJR Am J Roentgenol 167:1451–1455

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hu H, He HD, Foley WD, Fox SH (2000) Four multidetector-row helical CT: image quality and volume coverage speed. Radiology 215:55–62

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Flohr TG, Schaller S, Stierstorfer K, Bruder H, Ohnesorge BM, Schoepf UJ (2005) Multi-detector row CT systems and image-reconstruction techniques. Radiology 235:756–773

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rydberg J, Buckwalter KA, Caldemeyer KS et al (2000) Multisection CT: scanning techniques and clinical applications. Radiographics 20:1787–1806

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Caoili EM, Paulson EK (2000) CT of small-bowel obstruction: another perspective using multiplanar reformations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 174:993–998

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Donckier V, Closset J, Van Gransbeke D et al (1998) Contribution of computer tomography to decision making in the management of adhesive small bowel obstruction. Br J Surg 85:1071–1074

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Paulson EK, Jaffe TA, Thomas J, Harris JP, Nelson RC (2004) MDCT of patients with acute abdominal pain: a new perspective using coronal reformations from submillimeter isotropic voxels. AJR Am J Roentgenol 183:899–906

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rubin GD (2000) Data explosion: the challenge of multidetector-row CT. Eur J Radiol 36:74–80

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sherbondy AJ, Holmlund D, Rubin GD, Schraedley PK, Winograd T, Napel S (2005) Alternative input devices for efficient navigation of large CT angiography data sets. Radiology 234:391–398

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Schmidt S, Chevallier P, Chalaron M et al (2005) Multidetector CT enteroclysis: comparison of the reading performance for axial and coronal views. Eur Radiol 15:238–246

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vahid Yaghmai.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yaghmai, V., Nikolaidis, P., Hammond, N.A. et al. Multidetector-row computed tomography diagnosis of small bowel obstruction: can coronal reformations replace axial images?. Emerg Radiol 13, 69–72 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-006-0513-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-006-0513-9

Keywords

Navigation