Comparison of Two Pearl Sacs Formed in the Same Recipient Oyster with Different Genetic Background Involved in Yellow Pigmentation in Pinctada fucata
- 260 Downloads
Color is one of the most important factors determining the commercial value of pearls. Pinctada fucata is a well-known pearl oyster producing high-quality Akoya pearls. Phenotypic variation in amount of yellow pigmentation produces white and yellowish pearls. It has been reported that polymorphism of yellow pigmentation of Akoya pearls is genetically regulated, but the responsible gene(s) has remained unknown. Here, we prepared pearl sac pairs formed in the same recipient oyster but coming from donor oysters that differ in their color. These two pearl sacs produced pearls with different yellowness even in the same recipient oyster. Yellow tone of produced pearls was consistent with shell nacre color of donor oysters from which mantle grafts were prepared, indicating that donor oysters strongly contribute to the yellow coloration of Akoya pearls. We also conducted comparative RNA-seq analysis and retrieved several candidate genes involved in the pearl coloration. Whole gene expression patterns of pair sacs were not grouped by pearl color they produced, but grouped by recipient oysters in which they were grown, suggesting that the number of genes involved in the yellow coloration is quite small, and that recipient oyster affects gene expression of the majority of genes in the pearl sac.
KeywordsPearl oyster Pinctada fucata Pearl color Yellow pigment RNA-seq
This study was partially supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grand numbers JP26292108 and JP17K19282.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
- Funabara D, Ohmori F, Kinoshita S, Koyama H, Mizutani S, Ota A, Osakabe Y, Nagai K, Maeyama K, Okamoto K, Kanoh S, Asakawa S, Watabe S (2014) Novel genes participating in the formation of prismatic and nacreous layers in the pearl oyster as revealed by their tissue distribution and RNA interference knockdown. PLoS One 15:e84706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kenneth JL, Thomas DS (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT method. Sci Direct 25(4):402–408Google Scholar
- Kinoshita S, Wang N, Inoue H, Maeyama K, Okamoto K, Nagai K, Kondo H, Hirono I, Asakawa S, Watabe S (2011) Deep sequencing of ESTs from nacreous and prismatic layer producing tissues and a screen for novel shell formation-related genes in the pearl oyster. PLoS One 6:e21238CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Lemer S, Saulnier D, Gueguen Y, Planes S (2015) Identification of genes associated with shell color in the black-lipped pearl oyster, Pinctada margaritifera. BMC Genomics 16:568Google Scholar
- Pabic LL, Parrad S, Koua MS, Nakasai S, Saulnier D, Devaux D, Ky CL (2016) Culture site dependence on pearl size realization in Pinctada margaritifera in relation to recipient oyster growth and mantle graft biomineralization gene expression using the same donor phenotype. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 182:294–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Takeuchi T, Kawashima T, Koyanagi R, Gyoja F, Tanaka M, Ikuta T, Shoguchi E, Fujiwara M, Shinzato C, Hisata K, Fujie M, Usami T, Nagai K, Maeyama K, Okamoto K, Aoki H, Ishikawa T, Masaoka T, Fujiwara A, Endo K, Endo H, Nagasawa H, Kinoshita S, Asakawa S, Watabe S, Satoh N (2012) Draft genome of the pearl oyster Pinctada fucata: a platform for understanding bivalve biology. DNA Res 19:117–130CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar