Marine Biotechnology

, Volume 11, Issue 3, pp 301–306 | Cite as

Preliminary Analysis of Length and GC Content Variation in the Ribosomal First Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS1) of Marine Animals

  • S. Chow
  • Y. Ueno
  • M. Toyokawa
  • I. Oohara
  • H. Takeyama
Short Communication


Length and guanine–cytosine (GC) content of the ribosomal first internal transcribed spacer (ITS1) were compared across a wide variety of marine animal species, and its phylogenetic utility was investigated. From a total of 773 individuals representing 599 species, we only failed to amplify the ITS1 sequence from 87 individuals by polymerase chain reaction with universal ITS1 primers. No species was found to have an ITS1 region shorter than 100 bp. In general, the ITS1 sequences of vertebrates were longer (318 to 2,318 bp) and richer in GC content (56.8% to 78%) than those of invertebrates (117 to 1,613 bp and 35.8% to 71.3%, respectively). Specifically, gelatinous animals (Cnidaria and Ctenophora) were observed to have short ITS1 sequences (118 to 422 bp) with lower GC content (35.8% to 61.7%) than the other animal taxa. Mollusca and Crustacea were diverse groups with respect to ITS1 length, ranging from 108 to 1,118 and 182 to 1,613 bp, respectively. No universal relationship between length and GC content was observed. Our data indicated that ITS1 has a limited utility for phylogenetic analysis as obtaining confident sequence alignment was often impossible between different genera of the same family and even between congeneric species.


GC content ITS1 Length Marine animals Phylogenetic utility 



We would like to thank M. Hamaguchi, National Research Institute of Fisheries and Environment of Inland Sea; T. Yanagimoto, National Research Institute of Far Seas Fisheries; and T. Yoshimura, Seikai National Fisheries Research Institute for sharing their invaluable specimens. We also thank S. Katayama, S. Kawashima, and H. Kurogi, National Research Institute of Fisheries Science for assisting in sample collection in the Arasaki area and M. Michibayashi and H. Hasegawa for their technical assistance with the DNA analysis. This work was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Priority Areas (B) (No. 17380126) from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports, and Culture, Japan.


  1. Chu KH, Li CP, Ho HY (2001) The first internal transcribed spacer (ITS-1) of ribosomal DNA as a molecular marker for phylogenetic and population analyses in crustacean. Mar Biotechnol 3:335–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Coleman AW, Vacquier VD (2004) Exploring the phylogenetic utility of ITS sequences for animals: a test case for abalone (Haliotis). J Mol Evol 54:246–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Croce O, Lamarre M, Christen R (2006) Querying the public databases for sequences using complex keywords contained in the feature lines. BMC Bioinformatics 7:45–50PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dover GA (1986) Molecular drive in multigene families, how biological novelties arise, spread and are assimilated. Trends Genet 2:159–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Furlong JC, Maden BE (1983) Patterns of major divergence between the internal transcribed spacers of ribosomal DNA in Xenopus borealis and Xenopus laevis, and of minimal divergence within ribosomal coding regions. EMBO J 2:443–448PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Goldman WE, Goldberg G, Bowman LH, Steinmetz D, Schlessinger D (1983) Mouse rDNA: sequences and evolutionary analysis of spacer and mature RNA regions. Mol Cell Biol 3:1488–1500PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Gonzalez IL, Sylvester JE, Smith TF, Stambolian D, Schmickel RD (1990) Ribosomal RNA gene sequences and hominoid phylogeny. Mol Biol Evol 7:203–219PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Gottschling M, Plötner J (2004) Secondary structure models of the nuclear internal transcribed spacer regions and 5.8S rRNA in Calciodinelloideae (Peridiniaceae) and other dinoflagellates. Nucleic Acids Res 32:307–315PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hall LMC, Maden BEH (1980) Nucleotide sequence through the 18S-28S intergene region of a vertebrate ribosomal transcription unit. Nucleic Acids Res 8:5993–6005PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Harris DJ, Crandall KA (2000) Intragenomic variation within ITS1 and ITS2 of freshwater crayfishes (Decapoda: Cambaridae): implications for phylogenetic and microsatellite studies. Mol Biol Evol 17:284–291PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Hsueh JYC, Bohm RP Jr, Didier PJ, Tang X, Lasbury ME, Li B, Bartlett MS, Smith JW, Lee CH (2001) Internal transcribed spacer regions of rRNA genes of Pneumocystis carinii from monkeys. Clin Diag Lab Immunol 8:503–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kochzius M, Nölte M, Weber H, Silkenbeumer N, Hjörleifsdottir S, Hreggvidsson GO, Marteinsson V, Kappel K, Planes S, Tinti F, Magoulas A, Garcia Vazquez E, Turan C, Hervet C, Campo Falgueras D, Antoniou A, Landi M, Blohm D (2008) DNA microarrays for identifying fishes. Mar Biotechnol 10:207–217PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Subrahmanyam CS, Cassidy B, Busch H, Rothblum LI (1982) Nucleotide sequence of the region between the 18S rRNA sequence and the 28S rRNA sequence of rat ribosomal DNA. Nucleic Acids Res 10:3667–3680PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Sumida M, Kato Y, Kurabayashi A (2004) Sequencing and analysis of the internal transcribed spacers (ITSs) and coding regions in the EcoRI fragment of the ribosomal DNA of the Japanese pond frog Rana nigromaculata. Genes Genet Syst 79:105–118PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. von der Schulenburg JHG, English U, Wägele JW (1999) Evolution of ITS1 rDNA in the Digenea (Platyhelminthes: Trematoda): 39 end sequence conservation and its phylogenetic utility. J Mol Evol 48:2–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. von der Schulenburg JHG, Hancock JM, Pagnamenta A, Sloggett JJ, Majerus MEN, Hurst GDD (2001) Extreme length and length variation in the first ribosomal internal transcribed spacer of ladybird beetles (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Mol Biol Evol 18:648–660PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Chow
    • 1
  • Y. Ueno
    • 2
  • M. Toyokawa
    • 1
  • I. Oohara
    • 1
  • H. Takeyama
    • 3
  1. 1.National Research Institute of Fisheries ScienceYokosukaJapan
  2. 2.Tohoku National Fisheries Research InstituteHachinoheJapan
  3. 3.Department of Life Science and Medical Bio-ScienceWaseda UniversityShinjukuJapan

Personalised recommendations