Marine Biotechnology

, Volume 10, Issue 4, pp 471–477 | Cite as

Detoxification of Toxic Heavy Metals by Marine Bacteria Highly Resistant to Mercury

  • Jaysankar DeEmail author
  • N. Ramaiah
  • L. Vardanyan
Original Article


Pollution in industrial areas is a serious environmental concern, and interest in bacterial resistance to heavy metals is of practical significance. Mercury (Hg), Cadmium (Cd), and lead (Pb) are known to cause damage to living organisms, including human beings. Several marine bacteria highly resistant to mercury (BHRM) capable of growing at 25 ppm (mg L−1) or higher concentrations of mercury were tested during this study to evaluate their potential to detoxify Cd and Pb. Results indicate their potential of detoxification not only of Hg, but also Cd and Pb. Through biochemical and 16S rRNA gene sequence analyses, these bacteria were identified to belong to Alcaligenes faecalis (seven isolates), Bacillus pumilus (three isolates), Bacillus sp. (one isolate), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (one isolate), and Brevibacterium iodinium (one isolate). The mechanisms of heavy metal detoxification were through volatilization (for Hg), putative entrapment in the extracellular polymeric substance (for Hg, Cd and Pb) as revealed by the scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy, and/or precipitation as sulfide (for Pb). These bacteria removed more than 70% of Cd and 98% of Pb within 72 and 96 h, respectively, from growth medium that had initial metal concentrations of 100 ppm. Their detoxification efficiency for Hg, Cd and Pb indicates good potential for application in bioremediation of toxic heavy metals.


Heavy metals Bacteria highly resistant to mercury Detoxification Volatilization merEnergy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy Scanning electron microscopy Bioremediation 



The authors thank the Director of the NIO; Drs. P. V. Narvekar and M. S. Prasad, Mrs. A. Mesquita, Mr. B. Fernandez, Mr. Khedekar; Dr. Russell Hill, Center of Marine Biotechnology, University of Maryland Biotechnology Institute, Baltimore, MD; and all of the anonymous reviewers. CSIR-SRF grant 31/26/75/2002 EMR-I and UGC-DAAD short-term scholarship to De J are gratefully acknowledged. This is NIO contribution number 4339.


  1. Bang SW, Clark DS, Keasling JD (2000) Engineering hydrogen sulfide production and cadmium removal by expression of the thiosulfate reductase gene (phsABC) from Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium in Escherichia coli. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:3939–3944PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barkay T, Liebert C, Gillman M (1989) Environmental significance of the potential for mer(Tn21)-mediated reduction of Hg2+ to Hg0 in natural waters. Appl Environ Microbiol 55:1196–1202PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Barkay T, Miller SM, Summers AO (2003) Bacterial mercury resistance from atoms to ecosystems. FEMS Microbiol Rev 27:355–384PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brim H, McFarlan SC, Fredrickson JK, Minton K, Zhai M, Wackett LP, Daly MJ (2000) Engineering Deinococcus radiodurans for metal remediation in radioactive mixed waste environments. Nat Biotechnol 18:85–90PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bruce KD, Osborn AM, Pearson AJ, Strike P, Ritchie DA (1995) Genetic diversity within mer genes directly amplified from communities in noncultivated soil and sediment bacteria. Mol Ecol 4:605–612PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cameron RE (1992) Guide to site and soil description for hazardous waste characterization, vol I: Metals. Environmental Protection Agency EPA/600/4-91/029. p 250Google Scholar
  7. Cànovas D, Cases I, de Lorenzo V (2003) Heavy metal tolerance and metal homeostasis in Pseudomonas putida as revealed by complete genome analysis. Env Microb 5:1242–1256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chang JS, Hong J, Ogunseitan OA, Olson HB (1993) Interaction of mercuric ions with the bacterial growth medium and its effects in enzymatic reduction of mercury. Biotechnol Prog 9:526–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chang JS, Law R, Chang CC (1997) Biosorption of lead, copper and mercury by biomass of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PU21. Wat Res 31:1651–1658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. De J, Ramaiah N (2007) Characterization of marine bacteria highly resistant to mercury exhibiting multiple resistances to toxic chemicals. Ecol Ind 7:511–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. De Rore H, Top E, Houwen F, Mergcay M, Verstraete W (1994) Evolution of heavy metal-resistant transconjugants in a soil environment with a concomitant selective pressure. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 14:263–273Google Scholar
  12. De J, Ramaiah N, Mesquita A, Verlekar XN (2003) Tolerance to various toxicants by marine bacteria highly resistant to mercury. Mar Biotechnol 5:185–193PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. De J, Sarkar A, Ramaiah N (2006) Bioremediation of toxic substances by mercury resistant marine bacteria. Ecotoxicology DOI  10.1007/s10646-006-0066-4
  14. Deng X, Wilson DB (2001) Bioaccumulation of mercury from wastewater by genetically engineered Escherichia coli. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 56:276–279PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Doelman P, Jansen E, Michels M, Til MV (1994) Effects of heavy metals in soil on microbial diversity and activity as shown by the sensitivity-resistance index, an ecologically relevant parameter. Biol Fertil Soil 17:177–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dong D, Nelson YM, Lion LW, Shuler ML, Ghiorse WM (2000) Adsorption of Pb and Cd onto metal oxides and organic material in natural surface coatings as determined by selective extractions: new evidence for the importance of Mn and Fe oxides. Wat Res 34:427–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gadd GM (1990) Heavy metal accumulation by bacteria and other microorganisms. Experientia 46:834–840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gadd GM, White C (1993) Microbial treatment of metal pollution: a working biotechnology? Trends Biotechnol 11:353–359PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hassan MET, der Lelie DV, Springael D, Römling N, Ahmed N, Mergeay M (1999) Identification of a gene cluster, czr, involved in cadmium and zinc resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Gene 238:417–425PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lee SW, Glickmann E, Cooksey A (2001) Chromosomal locus for cadmium resistance in Pseudomonas putida consisting of cadmium-transporting ATPase and a MerR family response regulator. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:1437–1444PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Liesegang H, Lemke K, Siddiqui RA, Schlegel HG (1993) Characterization of the inducible nickel and cobalt resistance determinant cnr from pMOL28 of Alcaligenes eutrophus CH34. J Bacteriol 175:767–778PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Nies DH (1999) Microbial heavy-metal resistance. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 51:730–750PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nies DH, Silver S (1995) Ion efflux systems involved in bacterial metal resistances. J Ind Microbiol 14:186–199PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Osborn AM, Bruce KD, Strike P, Ritchie DA (1997) Distribution, diversity and evolution of the bacterial mercury resistance (mer) operon. FEMS Microbiol Rev 19:239–262PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pain A, Cooney JJ (1998) Characterization of organotin-resistant bacteria from Boston Harbor sediment. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 35:412–416PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rasmussen LD, Sørensen SJ (1998) The effect of long-term exposure of mercury in the bacterial community in marine sediment. Curr Microbiol 36:291–297PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Reyes NS, Frischer ME, Sobecky PA (1999) Characterization of mercury resistance mechanisms in marine sediment microbial communities. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 30:273–284PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Roane TM, Pepper IL (2000) Microbial responses to environmentally toxic cadmium. Microb Ecol 38:358–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sharma PK, Blackwill DL, Frenkel A, Vairavamurthy MA (2000) A new Klebsiella planticola strain (Cd-1) grows anaerobically at high cadmium concentrations and precipitates cadmium sulfide. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:3083–3087PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Silver S (1996) Bacterial resistances to toxic metals: a review. Gene 179:9–19PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Silver S, Phung TL (1996) Bacterial heavy metal resistance: new surprise. Annu Rev Microbiol 50:753–789PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wang CL, Michels PC, Dawson SC, Kitisakkul S, Bross JA, Keasling JD, Clark DS (1997) Cadmium removal by a new strain of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in aerobic culture. Appl Environ Microbiol 63:4075–4078PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Institute of OceanographyDona PaulaIndia
  2. 2.Insitute of Hydroecology and Ichthyology, NASYerevanArmenia
  3. 3.Graduate School of Kuroshio Science (GRAKUS)Kochi UniversityNankokuJapan

Personalised recommendations