Characterization of Muscle-Regulatory Gene, MyoD, from Flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus) and Analysis of Its Expression Patterns During Embryogenesis
- 941 Downloads
Specification and differentiation of skeletal muscle cells are driven by the activity of genes encoding members of the myogenic regulatory factors (MRFs). In vertebrates, the MRF family includes MyoD, Myf5, myogenin, and MRF4. The MRFs are capable of converting a variety of nonmuscle cells into myoblasts and myotubes. To better understand their roles in fish muscle development, we isolated the MyoD gene from flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus) and analyzed its structure and patterns of expression. Sequence analysis showed that flounder MyoD shared a structure similar to that of vertebrate MRFs with three exons and two introns, and its protein contained a highly conserved basic helix–loop–helix domain (bHLH). Comparison of sequences revealed that flounder MyoD was highly conserved with other fish MyoD genes. Sequence alignment and phylogenetic analysis indicated that flounder MyoD, seabream (Sparus aurata) MyoD1, takifugu (Takifugu rubripes) MyoD, and tilapia (Oreochromis aureus) MyoD were more likely to be homologous genes. Flounder MyoD expression was first detected as two rows of presomitic cells in the segmental plate. From somitogenesis, MyoD transcripts were present in the adaxial cells that give rise to slow muscles and the lateral somitic cells that give rise to fast muscles. After 30 somites formed, MyoD expression decreased in the somites except the caudal somites, coincident with somite maturation. In the hatching stage, MyoD was expressed in other muscle cells and caudal somites. It was detected only in muscle in the growing fish.
Keywordsflounder muscle MyoD myogenesis somites
Members of the myogenic regulating factors (MRFs) family are basic helix–loop–helix (bHLH) transcription factors, and include MyoD, Myf5, myogenin, and MRF4 (Buckingham, 1992). They exert a pivotal role in the determination and differentiation of vertebrate skeletal muscle. The MRF proteins contain several functionally distinct domains responsible for transcriptional activation, chromatin remodeling, DNA binding, nuclear localization, and heterodimerization (Tapscott et al., 1988; Weintraub et al., 1991; Schwarz et al., 1992; Vandromme et al., 1995; Gerber et al., 1997). The important one is thebHLH domain which is highly conserved in allof the MRFs. The bHLH domain can dimerize with ubiquitously expressed E-proteins, such as E12, E47, HEB, and ITF (Murre et al., 1989; Sun and Baltimore, 1991; Lin and Konieczny, 1992; Langlands et al., 1997). This heterodimer binds to a consensus DNA sequence called E-box (CANNTG), present in the regulatory regions of many skeletal-muscle-specific genes (Lassar et al., 1989; Murre et al., 1989; Blackwell and Weintraub, 1990).
The MRFs are able to convert a wide range of cell types into the myogenic lineage when ectopically expressed (Edmonson and Olson, 1993). Gene targeting experiments indicated that MyoD and Myf5 were required for myogenic determination, whereas myogenin and MRF4 were important for terminal differentiation and lineage maintenance (Rudnicki and Jaenisch, 1995; Megeney and Rudnicki, 1995). Gene disruption in mice revealed the roles of MRFs in muscle development (Arnold and Winter, 1998). It appeared that MRFs exhibited distinct and partial redundant functions in regulating muscle formation (Megeney and Rudnicki, 1995; Rudnicki and Jaenisch, 1995; Wang et al., 1996). MyoD null mutant mice displayed normal skeletal muscles but expressed about fourfold higher levels of Myf5 (Rudnicki et al., 1992). In contrast to the MyoD mutant, mice lacking a functional Myf5 gene died from severe rib abnormalities although there were no significant abnormalities in skeletal muscle (Braun et al., 1992, 1994). When both MyoD and Myf5 are mutated, mice display a complete absence of skeletal myocytes or myofibers (Rudnicki et al., 1993). Inactivation of MRF4 resulted in grossly normal muscle formation, and showed about a fourfold increase in expression of myogenin (Braun and Arnold, 1995; Patapoutian et al., 1995; Zhang et al., 1995).
Growth rate of cultured fish is one of the most important factors in the success of aquaculture. The normal stimulus for muscle growth in growing fish is not well understood. Understanding the regulation of muscle growth in fish is of particular importance for aquaculture. Fish meat, consisting of most skeletal muscles, provides high value proteins in the diet. Evidence indicates that muscle growth is regulated positively and negatively by a variety ofgrowth and transcription factors. These factors include growth hormone (Du et al., 1992; Devlin etal., 1994; Mommsen and Moon, 2001), fibroblast growth factors (Du, 2004; Rescan, 2005), insulin-like growth factors (Rescan, 2005), and transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β)(Xu et al., 2003; Rescan, 2005) and directly or indirectly act on MRFs. Several MRF genes have been studied in fish (Rescan et al., 1995, 1999; Weinberg et al., 1996; Kobiyama et al., 1998; Delalande and Rescan, 1999; Chen et al., 2000, 2001; Coutelle et al., 2001; Tan and Du, 2002; Tan etal., 2002) and were shown to be muscle specific. In rainbow trout, it has shown that the myogensis expressions levels related to the myoblast hyperplasia and hypertrophy (Johansen and Overturf, 2005). These data indicate that MRFs play important roles in regulating muscle development and growth in fish.
Flounder is an economically important fish in the Asian region. Although flounder has been cultured for many years, there is little information about its skeletal muscle formation. To understand the muscle formation and the functions of factors that regulate muscle growth in flounder, herein we report the isolation and characterization of the flounder MyoD gene and determination of its expression pattern during embryonic development.
Materials and Methods
Fish and Embryos Culture
Flounder were cultured at the Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences and a fish farm in Rongcheng city, Shandong Province under natural or controlled conditions (photoperiod, 14 h light: 10 h dark; temperature, 15 ± 1°C; seawater; aeration). Fish were fed a commercial particle diet twice a day. The fertilized eggs were obtained by mixing sperm and eggs collected from matured males and females by artificial gently stripping, respectively. The embryos were cultured at 15 ± 1°C in 1m3 tank under the same condition as the fish culture.
Isolation of Flounder MyoD Gene
Genomic Walker Primers and RT-PCR Primers
Reverse Transcriptase-PCR (RT-PCR)
To determine the intron–exon boundary, flounder MyoD cDNA was isolated by RT-PCR. Total RNAs were extracted from flounder embryos using Trizol (Invitrogen, USA). cDNA was synthesized using the first strand cDNA synthesis kit (Promega, USA). PCR was performed using Pfu enzyme (Promega, USA) and specific primers (FLMDc-1 and FLMDc-2) (Table 1). The fragments were cloned into pBluescript II SK (Stratagene, USA) Sma I site and sequenced.
To determine if the MyoD exhibited distinct pattern of expression in different tissue of growing fish, total RNAs were extracted from muscle, kidney, liver, spleen, and heart of growing flounder about 10 cm in length. The expression of MyoD was analyzed by RT-PCR using specific primers (MyoD1 and FLMDc-2) (Table 1). Actin was used as the control. The specific primers for flounder actin were Act-5 and Act-3 (Table 1).
Protein Alignment and Phylogenetic Analysis
Protein alignment and phylogenetic analysis was done by using program Clustal W (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/clustalw/). During phylogenetic analysis, full protein sequences were used, no amino acid wasdeleted, gaps were not ignored, and the distances were corrected using Kimura Correction of distances method according to Clustal W program (Thompson et al., 1994). The phylogenetic tree was constructed using the neighbor-joining method according to Clustal W program (Thompson et al., 1994).
Transcriptional Factor Binding Site Prediction
Transcriptional factor binding sites were predicted by using Match program (http://www.gene-regulation.com/pub/programs.html#match). The database is TRANSFAC® 6.0 (Kel-Margoulis et al., 2002).
Whole Mount in Situ Hybridization
The plasmid clone containing the 5′ UTR and part of the exon-1 sequence of flounder MyoD was used as a template to generate the sense and antisense digoxigenin-labeled RNA probes using T7 RNA polymerase. RNA probes were made by in vitro transcription in the presence of digoxigenin-11-UTP* (Roche Applied Science, Germany). Hatching embryos were anesthetized with 0.2% MS222 (3-aminobenzoic acid ethyl ester) before fixation. Embryos were fixed overnight at 4°C with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS (pH 7.4) and then stored in 100% methanol at −20°C. Embryos were dechorionated with fine forceps. Hatching stage embryos were treated with 10 μg/ml of Proteinase K for 10 min in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) at room temperature. Next, the embryos were refixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 min at room temperature. In situ hybridization was carried out as described by Du and Dienhart (2001). Embryos in glycerol were photographed under the microscope (DM LB2, Leica) with a Nikon 4500 digital camera.
Results and Discussion
Isolation and Characterization of the MyoD Gene from Flounder
The flounder MyoD gene was isolated by PCR from flounder Genome Walker libraries as described in Materials and Methods. During the first two rounds of PCR using the MRF consensus primers with the adaptor-specific primers, a 500-bp fragment was amplified. Sequence analysis revealed that this fragment was the homolog of MyoD. The complete genomic sequence of flounder MyoD was determined (GenBank accession no. DQ184914) and shown a size of approximately 4.1 kb. Sequence analysis predicted three exons and two introns with conserved consensus sequence GT⋖AG at the exon intron boundary. This structure was shared by all vertebrate MRFs and verified by RT-PCR. Flounder MyoD encodes a protein of 296 amino acids including a highly conserved bHLH domain.
It had been reported that there were two MyoDs in trout (Delalande and Rescan, 1999) and sea bream (Tan and Du, 2002), which were specifically expressed in muscle. In sea bream embryos, MyoD1 was expressed in both fast and slow muscles, while MyoD2 expression was first detected in both fast and slow muscle precursors, and then decreased gradually in slow muscle precursors. In adult, seabream fast muscles expressed both MyoD1 and MyoD2, while slow muscles predominantly expressed MyoD1 (Tan and Du, 2002). Trout MyoD1 was similarly expressed as seabream MyoD1 but the expression pattern of trout MyoD2 was quite different. Trout MyoD2 was first detected in late-stage embryos and expressed only in slow muscles of adult trout (Delalande and Rescan, 1999). Both MyoD1 were expressed similarly to the flounder MyoD. It is possible that the differential expression of two MyoD genes in the fast and slow muscles of late embryos and adult reflect the difference of these two types of muscle fibers in different fish species.
Analysis of the promoter sequences identified five putative E-box sites (CAnnTG), one MEF-2, NF-Y, SP1, USF, and some other transcriptional factor binding sites in the MyoD promoter (Figure 1B). A putative TATA box (TATAA) and a polyadenylation site (AATAAA) were found in the 5′- and 3′-flanking regions of the MyoD gene. In the four homologs, only the promoters of sea bream MyoD1 and flounder MyoD are long enough to be compared. Comparison of their promoter sequences revealed that there was a highly conserved region of 187 bp in the sea bream MyoD1 and flounder MyoD promoters (Figure 1C). Interestingly, within this conserved region, there were one putative NF-Y and one putative SP1 binding sites separated by 25 nucleotides, followed by USF, TATA-box, and E-box in the relative same sites.
The Temporal and Spatial Expression of MyoD in Flounder Embryos
Like MyoD genes of other fish, flounder MyoD is also initially expressed in medial (adaxial) cells close to the notochord that will migrate through the somites and form superficial cells later. This type of cell will differentiate into slow muscle fibers while the fast muscle fibers arising from the differentiation of lateral somitic cells (Devoto et al., 1996; Stoiber et al., 1998). Before 5 somites, MyoD expression was restricted to the adaxial and presomitic cells. From 5 somites to 30 somites, the signals were expanded to the lateral somitic cells. After 30 somites, MyoD transcripts were decreased in the anterior and older somites, while still strong in the caudal and newly formed somites. Skeletal muscle cells were not the only muscle cells that can express MyoD.
The Distribution of MyoD in Different Tissues of Growing Fish
Fish are usually the important commercial products of seafood. Fish skeletal muscles are the most abundant tissue in fish. Our RT-PCR results showed that MyoD was expressed only in the muscle in growing fish. In a group of cultured fish of the same age, there exist fast-growing and slow-growing fish. Their muscle growth rates are different. However, we do not know whether their expression levels of MyoD are different. A recent study showed that different growth rates were related to the expression level of MyoD, which affect muscle growth rates in turkey (Liu et al., 2005). In rainbow trout, the TMyoD2 expression level related to muscle fiber numbers (Johansen and Overturf, 2005), which is muscle hyperplastic growth. Therefore, it will be more interesting to study the relationship between the expression level of MyoD and the growth rate of flounder. This information can be used to help to select strains of fast growing fish that are profitable for products.
In summary, we isolated and characterized the flounder MyoD gene, and analyzed its expression pattern during embryogenesis. Sequence analysis revealed that the flounder MyoD gene contained the same structure as that of other vertebrates MRF genes. Phylogenetic analysis showed that it was more likely to be the homolog of tilapia and takifugu MyoD and seabream MyoD1. The flounder MyoD gene was expressed in the somitic cells that would give rise to skeletal muscle. In the hatching stage, MyoD was also expressed in other muscle cells. In the growing fish, MyoD was expressed only in the muscle.
This work was supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program, No.2004CB117402) and the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863 Program, No. 2004AA628110).
- Blackwell, T, Weintraub, H 1990Differences and similarities in DNA-binding preferences of MyoD and E2A protein complexes revealed by binding site selectionScience25011041110Google Scholar
- Braun, T, Arnold, HH 1995Inactivation of Myf-6 and Myf-5 genes in mice leads to alterations in skeletal muscle developmentEMBO J1411761186Google Scholar
- Braun, T, Bober, E, Rudnicki, MA, Jaenisch, R, Arnold, HH 1994 MyoD expression marks the onset of skeletal myogenesis in homouzygous Myf5 mutant miceDevelopment12030833092Google Scholar
- Buckingham, M 1992Making muscle in animalsTrends Genet8144149Google Scholar
- Chen, YH, Lee, WC, Cheng, CH, Tsai, HJ 2000Muscle regulatory factor gene: zebrafish (Danio rerio) myogenin cDNAComp Biochem Physiol B12797103Google Scholar
- Devoto, SH, Melancon, E, Eisen, JS, Westerfield, M 1996Identification of separate slow and fast muscle precursor cells in vivo, prior to somite formationDevelopment12233713380Google Scholar
- Du, SJ 2004
Molecular regulation of fish muscle development and growthKorzh, VGong, Z eds. Molecular Aspects in Fish and Marine BiologyWorld Scientific PublicationsSingaporeGoogle Scholar
- Edmonson, DG, Olson, EN 1993Helix-loop-helix proteins as regulators of muscle-specific transcriptionJ Biol Chem268755758Google Scholar
- Gerber, A, Klesert, TR, Bergstrom, DA, Tapscott, SJ 1997Two domains of MyoD mediate transcriptional activation of genes in repressive chromatin: a mechanism for lineage determination in myogenesisGenes Dev11436450Google Scholar
- Johansen KA, Overturf K (2005) Quantitative Expression Analysis of Genes Affecting Muscle Growth during Development of Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Mar Biotechnol (NY). doi: 10.1007/s10126-004-5133-3. 7, 576–587Google Scholar
- Kobiyama, A, Nihei, Y, Hirayama, Y, Kikuchi, K, Suetake, H, Johnston, IA, Watabe, S 1998Molecular cloning and developmental expression patterns of the MyoD and MEF2 families of muscle transcription factors in the carpJ Exp Biol20128012813Google Scholar
- Lassar, A, Buskin, JN, Lockshon, D, Davis, RL, Apone, S, Hauschka, SD, Weintraub, H 1989MyoD is a sequence-specific DNA binding protein requiring a region of myc homology to bind to the muscle creatine kinase enhancerCell58823831Google Scholar
- Lin, H, Konieczny, SF 1992Identification of MRF4, myogenin, and E12 oligomer complexes by chemical crosslinking and two-dimensional gel electrophoresisJ Biol Chem26747734780Google Scholar
- Liu, C, McFarland, DC, Velleman, SG 2005Effect of genetic selection on MyoD and myogenin expression in turkeys with different growth ratesPoult Sci84376384Google Scholar
- Megeney, L, Rudnicki, MA 1995Determination versus differentiation and the MyoD family of transcription factorsBiochem Cell Biol73723732Google Scholar
- Mommsen T, Moon TW (2001) Hormonal regulation of muscle growth. In: Muscle Development and Growth, Johnston IA, eds. (Academic Press)Google Scholar
- Murre, C, McCaw, PS, Vaessin, H, Caudy, M, Jan, LY, Jan, YN, Cabrera, CV, Buskin, JN, Hauschka, SD, Lassar, AB, Weintraub, H, Baltimore, D 1989Interactions between heterologous helix-loop-helix proteins generate complexes that bind specifically to a common DNA sequenceCell58537544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Patapoutian, A, Yoon, JK, Miner, JH, Wang, Sl, Stark, K, Wold, B 1995Disruption of the mouse MRF4 gene identifies multiple waves of myogenesis in the myotomeDevelopment12133473358Google Scholar
- Rescan, PY, Delalande, JM, Gauvry, L, Fauconneau, B 1999Differential expression of two ggenes during early development of the trout: comparison with myogeninJ Fish Biol551925Google Scholar
- Schwarz, J, Chakraborty, T, Martin, J, Zhou, J, Olson, EN 1992The basic region of myogenin cooperates with two transcription activation domains to induce muscle-specific transcriptionMol Cell Biol12266275Google Scholar
- Stoiber, W, Haslett, JR, Goldschmid, A, Sänger, AM 1998Patterns of superficial fibre formation in the european pearlfish (Rutilus frisii meidingeri) provide a general template for slow muscle development in teleost fishAnat Embryol (Berl)197485496Google Scholar
- Sun, XH, Baltimore, D 1991An inhibitory domain of E12 transcription factor prevents DNA binding in E12 homodimers but not in E12 heterodimersCell64459470Google Scholar
- Tan, X, Hoang, L, Du, SJ 2002Characterization of muscle-regulatory genes, Myf5 and myogenin, from striped bass and promoter analysis of muscle-specific expressionMar Biotechnol (NY)4537545Google Scholar
- Tapscott, S, Davis, RL, Thayer, MJ, Cheng, PF, Weintraub, H, Lassar, AB 1988MyoD1: a nuclear phosphoprotein requiring a myc homology region to convert fibroblasts to myoblastsScience242405411Google Scholar
- Thisse, C, Thisse, B, Schilling, TF, Postlethwait, JH 1993Structure of the zebrafish snail1 gene and its expression in wild-type, spadetail and no tail mutant embryosDevelopment11912031215Google Scholar
- Thompson, JD, Higgins, DG, Gibson, TJ 1994CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choiceNucleic Acids Res2246734680Google Scholar
- Vandromme, M, Cavadore, JC, Bonnieu, A, Froeschle, A, Lamb, N, Fernandez, A 1995Two nuclear localization signals present in the basic-helix 1 domains of MyoD promote its active nuclear translocation and can function independentlyProc Natl Acad Sci USA9246464650Google Scholar
- Wang, Y, Schnegelsberg, PNT, Dausman, J, Jaenisch, R 1996Functional redundancy of the muscle-specific transcription factors Myf5 and myogenin Nature379823825Google Scholar
- Weinberg, ES, Allende, ML, Kelly, CS, Abdelhamid, A, Murakami, T, Andermann, P, Doerre, OG, Grunwald, DJ, Riggleman, B 1996Developmental regulation of zebrafish MyoD in wild-type, no tail and spadetail embryosDevelopment22271280Google Scholar
- Weintraub, H, Dwarki, VJ, Verma, I, Davis, R, Hollenberg, S, Snider, L, Lassar, A, Tapscott, SJ 1991Muscle specific transcriptional activation by MyoDGenes Dev513771386Google Scholar
- Zhang, W, Behringer, RR, Olson, EN 1995Inactivation of the myogenic bHLH gene MRF4 results in up-regulation of myogenin and rib anomaliesGenes Dev913881399Google Scholar