Gastric adenocarcinoma in young adult patients: patterns of care and survival in the United States
Evidence regarding gastric cancer patients < 40 years old is limited. This study examines young adults with gastric adenocarcinoma in the National Cancer Database to describe demographics and treatment practices, and to develop a nomogram to predict survival.
The database was queried for adult patients diagnosed with gastric adenocarcinoma from 2004 to 2013. Patients were stratified into two age groups: <40 and ≥ 40 years. The database was analyzed to compare demographics, clinical characteristics, and treatments used for each group. Differences in survival were assessed using Kaplan–Meier curves and log-rank test. For adults < 40 years old, an accelerated failure time survival model was fitted for overall survival and a descriptive nomogram was constructed.
Of 70,084 patients included, 2615 (4%) were < 40 years old and 67,469 (96%) were ≥ 40 years. Compared to older patients, adults < 40 years old were more likely to be female (46 vs. 35%), non-white (31 vs. 23%), Hispanic (32 vs. 11%), from the northeast (36 vs. 23%), and to present with stage IV disease (59 vs. 42%) and bone metastases (36 vs. 21%; p < 0.001 for all). The nomogram showed clinical stage as the strongest predictor of overall survival, followed by treatment, grade, race, Charlson–Deyo comorbidity score, and sex.
Young adults with gastric adenocarcinoma are more likely to be Hispanic, female, from the northeast, and to present with metastases. Despite these differences, clinical stage, treatment, and tumor grade are most predictive of overall survival for young adult patients.
KeywordsGastric Young NCDB Adenocarcinoma
The authors wish to acknowledge the support of the Biostatistics Shared Resource Facility at Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai and NCI Cancer Center Support Grant P30 CA196521-01. No other funding sources were used. The American College of Surgeon and the Commission on Cancer have not verified and are not responsible for the analytic or statistical methodology employed, or the conclusions drawn from these data by the investigator. All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1964 and later versions. For this type of study, formal consent is not required. This study was presented at the 2016 European Society of Medical Oncology Meeting in Copenhagen, Denmark.
Study concept and design: De and Ang. Administrative support: all authors. Provision of study materials: all authors. Collection and assembly of data: all authors. Data analysis and interpretation: all authors. Manuscript writing: De. Final approval of manuscript: all authors.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
Randall Holcombe reports personal fees from Anthem Healthcare and Merck, outside the submitted work, and also reports involvement in a colon cancer clinical trial as Chair of a Data Safety and Monitoring Committee, outside the submitted work. All other authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
- 1.Jemal A, Ward EM, Johnson CJ, Cronin KA, Ma J, Ryerson AB, Mariotto A, Lake AJ, Wilson R, Sherman RL, Anderson RN, Henley SJ, Kohler BA, Penberthy L, Feuer EJ, Weir HK (2017) Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer, 1975–2014, Featuring Survival. JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djx030.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 2.Edwards BK, Noone AM, Mariotto AB, Simard EP, Boscoe FP, Henley SJ, Jemal A, Cho H, Anderson RN, Kohler BA, Eheman CR, Ward EM (2014) Annual Report to the Nation on the status of cancer, 1975–2010, featuring prevalence of comorbidity and impact on survival among persons with lung, colorectal, breast, or prostate cancer. Cancer 120(9):1290–1314. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.28509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2014. National Cancer Institute, Bethesda. http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2014/.
- 8.Kandel BP, Singh YP, Ghimire B. Unique features of gastric cancer in young patients: experience from a general hospital in Nepal. Asian Pac J Cancer Prevent: APJCP. 2016;17(5):2695–7.Google Scholar
- 12.Lopez-Basave HN, Morales-Vasquez F, Ruiz-Molina JM, Namendys-Silva SA, Vela-Sarmiento I, Ruan JM, Rosciano AE, Calderillo-Ruiz G, Diaz-Romero C, Herrera-Gomez A, Meneses-Garcia AA. Gastric cancer in young people under 30 years of age: worse prognosis, or delay in diagnosis? Cancer Manag Res. 2013;5:31–6. https://doi.org/10.2147/cmar.s40377.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 14.Cunningham D, Allum WH, Stenning SP, Thompson JN, Van de Velde CJ, Nicolson M, Scarffe JH, Lofts FJ, Falk SJ, Iveson TJ, Smith DB, Langley RE, Verma M, Weeden S, Chua YJ, Participants MT. Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(1):11–20. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa055531.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 15.Macdonald JS, Smalley SR, Benedetti J, Hundahl SA, Estes NC, Stemmermann GN, Haller DG, Ajani JA, Gunderson LL, Jessup JM, Martenson JA. Chemoradiotherapy after surgery compared with surgery alone for adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction. N Engl J Med. 2001;345(10):725–30. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa010187.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 16.Park SH, Sohn TS, Lee J, Lim DH, Hong ME, Kim KM, Sohn I, Jung SH, Choi MG, Lee JH, Bae JM, Kim S, Kim ST, Park JO, Park YS, Lim HY, Kang WK. Phase III trial to compare adjuvant chemotherapy with capecitabine and cisplatin versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy in gastric cancer: final report of the adjuvant chemoradiotherapy in stomach tumors trial, including survival and subset analyses. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(28):3130–6. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2014.58.3930.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 17.Noh SH, Park SR, Yang HK, Chung HC, Chung IJ, Kim SW, Kim HH, Choi JH, Kim HK, Yu W, Lee JI, Shin DB, Ji J, Chen JS, Lim Y, Ha S, Bang YJ. Adjuvant capecitabine plus oxaliplatin for gastric cancer after D2 gastrectomy (CLASSIC): 5-year follow-up of an open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(12):1389–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(14)70473-5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 19.Bang YJ, Van Cutsem E, Feyereislova A, Chung HC, Shen L, Sawaki A, Lordick F, Ohtsu A, Omuro Y, Satoh T, Aprile G, Kulikov E, Hill J, Lehle M, Ruschoff J, Kang YK. Trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for treatment of HER2-positive advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (ToGA): a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2010;376(9742):687–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(10)61121-x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 20.Ohtsu A, Shah MA, Van Cutsem E, Rha SY, Sawaki A, Park SR, Lim HY, Yamada Y, Wu J, Langer B, Starnawski M, Kang YK. Bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy as first-line therapy in advanced gastric cancer: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(30):3968–76. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2011.36.2236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Wilke H, Muro K, Van Cutsem E, Oh SC, Bodoky G, Shimada Y, Hironaka S, Sugimoto N, Lipatov O, Kim TY, Cunningham D, Rougier P, Komatsu Y, Ajani J, Emig M, Carlesi R, Ferry D, Chandrawansa K, Schwartz JD, Ohtsu A. Ramucirumab plus paclitaxel versus placebo plus paclitaxel in patients with previously treated advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (RAINBOW): a double-blind, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(11):1224–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(14)70420-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Muro K, Chung HC, Shankaran V, Geva R, Catenacci D, Gupta S, Eder JP, Golan T, Le DT, Burtness B, McRee AJ, Lin CC, Pathiraja K, Lunceford J, Emancipator K, Juco J, Koshiji M, Bang YJ. Pembrolizumab for patients with PD-L1-positive advanced gastric cancer (KEYNOTE-012): a multicentre, open-label, phase 1b trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(6):717–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(16)00175-3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 24.Smith AW, Bellizzi KM, Keegan THM, Zebrack B, Chen VW, Neale AV, Hamilton AS, Shnorhavorian M, Lynch CF. Health-related quality of life of adolescent and young adult patients with cancer in the united states: the adolescent and young adult health outcomes and patient experience study. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(17):2136–45. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2012.47.3173.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 25.Adolescent, Group YAOPR.. (2006) Closing the gap: research and care imperatives for adolescents and young adults with cancer (NIH Publication No. 06-6067). Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, and the LIVESTRONG Young Adult Alliance Bethesda, MDGoogle Scholar
- 28.Keegan THM, Ries LAG, Barr RD, Geiger AM, Dahlke DV, Pollock BH, Bleyer WA, For the National Cancer Institute Next Steps for A, Young Adult Oncology Epidemiology Working G. Comparison of cancer survival trends in the United States of adolescents and young adults with those in children and older adults. Cancer. 2016;122(7):1009–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.29869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.Parsons HM, Harlan LC, Lynch CF, Hamilton AS, Wu X-C, Kato I, Schwartz SM, Smith AW, Keel G, Keegan THM. Impact of cancer on work and education among adolescent and young adult cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(19):2393–400. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2011.39.6333.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 32.Stokes W, Amini A, Maroni PD, Kessler ER, Stokes C, Cost CR, Greffe BS, Garrington TP, Liu AK, Cost NG. Patterns of care and survival outcomes for adolescent and young adult patients with testicular seminoma in the United States: a National Cancer Database analysis. J Pediatric Urol. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2016.12.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 38.He Y, Luo H, Wang W, Chen J, Yao Y, Cai S, He J, Yan Y, Wu S, Hu X, Ke L, Niu J, Li H, Ji C, Hu B. Clinical features and prognosis-associated factors of non-small cell lung cancer exhibiting symptoms of bone metastasis at the time of diagnosis. Oncol Lett. 2015;9(6):2706–12. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2015.3081.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 40.Ajani JA, D’Amico TA, Almhanna K, Bentrem DJ, Chao J, Das P, Denlinger CS, Fanta P, Farjah F, Fuchs CS, Gerdes H, Gibson M, Glasgow RE, Hayman JA, Hochwald S, Hofstetter WL, Ilson DH, Jaroszewski D, Johung KL, Keswani RN, Kleinberg LR, Korn WM, Leong S, Linn C, Lockhart AC, Ly QP, Mulcahy MF, Orringer MB, Perry KA, Poultsides GA, Scott WJ, Strong VE, Washington MK, Weksler B, Willett CG, Wright CD, Zelman D, McMillian N, Sundar H. Gastric Cancer, Version 3.2016, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw: JNCCN. 2016;14(10):1286–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 41.Ajani JA, Winter K, Okawara GS, Donohue JH, Pisters PW, Crane CH, Greskovich JF, Anne PR, Bradley JD, Willett C, Rich TA. Phase II trial of preoperative chemoradiation in patients with localized gastric adenocarcinoma (RTOG 9904): quality of combined modality therapy and pathologic response. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(24):3953–8. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2006.06.4840.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar