Social computing in currency exchange

  • Pablo Chamoso
  • Alfonso González-BrionesEmail author
  • Alberto Rivas
  • Fernando De La Prieta
  • Juan M. Corchado
Regular Paper


Human communication has evolved over the last decades thanks to rapid technological advances. It has provided us with new ways of communicating with one another and made many aspects of social interaction easier. Social computing is an important area in computer science concerned with the use of computational systems for social purposes. This paper focuses on the use of social computing to simplify the process of currency exchange at airports where services have to be provided to people of all nationalities. This is a complex social scenario in which the buyer and seller must reach an agreement without speaking the same language, and in these cases, the probability of not understanding all the aspects of the transaction is high. The proposed system improves interaction between users and ensures a fast and secure operation. A multi-agent system is the base of the developed software; MAS is an important and commonly used tool in social computing. A case study was conducted with the proposed system at Sydney airport, with a Spanish currency exchange company (Global Exchange) which provides service to travelers from all continents. The Net Promoter Score metric was used to evaluate the developed system, and a score of 29.81 was obtained, indicating that customers were highly satisfied with the performance of the system. Moreover, thanks to the system, there was an increase of 34% in currency exchange operations, and the time it takes to provide service to a customer reduced by 73.67% on average.


Currency exchange Social computing Software Multi-agent systems 



This research is part of the project “Social Platform for Smart Currency Exchange” (ID: IDI-20160558) and has been financed by the Centro de Desarrollo Tecnológico e Industrial (CDTI) and the European Social Fund (ESF). The research of Alfonso González-Briones has been co-financed by the European Social Fund (Operational Programme 2014–2020 for Castilla y León, EDU/128/2015 BOCYL).


  1. 1.
    Allon G, Federgruen A, Pierson M (2011) How much is a reduction of your customers’ wait worth? An empirical study of the fast-food drive-thru industry based on structural estimation methods. Manuf Serv Oper Manag 13(4):489–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Betting F, Feldmar J, Ayache N, Devernay F (1995) A new framework for fusing stereo images with volumetric medical images. In: Ayache N (eds) Computer vision, virtual reality and robotics in medicine. CVRMed 1995. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 905. Springer, Berlin, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chamoso P, Rivas A, Rodríguez S, Bajo J (2018) Relationship recommender system in a business and employment-oriented social network. Inf Sci 433–434:204–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chamoso P, Rivas A, Sánchez-Torres R, Rodríguez S (2018) Social computing for image matching. PloS ONE 13(5):e0197576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Charron C, Favier J, Li C, et al (2006) Social computing: how networks erode institutional power, and what to do about it. Forrester Customer ReportGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Company AE (2018) American express|credit cards, travel & rewards. Visited 1 Mar 2018
  7. 7.
    Erickson T, Kellogg WA (2000) Social translucence: an approach to designing systems that support social processes. ACM Trans Comput Human Interact (TOCHI) 7(1):59–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Estellés-Arolas E, González-Ladrón-de Guevara F (2012) Towards an integrated crowdsourcing definition. J Inf Sci 38(2):189–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Eurodivisas S (2018) Cambio de divisas enespaña—global exchange—servicios de cambio de moneda. Visited 1 3 2018
  10. 10.
    Ferris B, Watkins K, Borning A (2010) Onebusaway: results from providing real-time arrival information for public transit. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, ACM, pp 1807–1816Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Frankel AS (1997) Monopoly and competition in the supply and exchange of money. Antitrust LJ 66:313Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fraternali P, Castelletti A, Soncini-Sessa R, Ruiz CV, Rizzoli AE (2012) Putting humans in the loop: social computing for water resources management. Environ Modell Softw 37:68–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Freelon D (2014) On the interpretation of digital trace data in communication and social computing research. J Broadcast Electron Media 58(1):59–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Inc TCS (2018) Money exchange|order your currency easily online|travelex. Visited 1 Mar 2018
  15. 15.
    Kim J, Christodoulidou N, Choo Y (2013) Factors influencing customer acceptance of kiosks at quick service restaurants. J Hosp Tour Technol 4(1):40–63Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ltd EPU (2018) Ebury uk|the latest fintech & finance solutions. Visited 1 Mar 2018
  17. 17.
    Ltd K (2018) Kantox: currency and risk management solutions. Visited 1 Mar 2018
  18. 18.
    Maccorp Exact Change E.P., S.: Exact change: Cambio de divisas y moneda en españa (2018). Visited 1 Mar 2018
  19. 19.
    MONEY EXCHANGE S (2018) Money exchange s.a.—envío de dinero a todo el mundo. Visited 1 Mar 2018
  20. 20.
    Parameswaran M, Whinston AB (2007) Social computing: an overview. Commun Assoc Inf Syst 19(1):37Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Popovic V, Kraal BJ, Kirk PJ (2009) Passenger experience in an airport: an activity-centred approach. In: IASDR 2009 proceedings pp 1–10Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Raghubir P, Morwitz VG, Santana S (2012) Europoly money: how do tourists convert foreign currencies to make spending decisions? J Retail 88(1):7–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rivas A, Martín-Limorti JJ, Chamoso P, González-Briones A, De La Prieta F, Rodríguez S (2018) Human-computer interaction in currency exchange. In: International conference on knowledge management in organizations. Springer, pp 390–400Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Robertson D, Giunchiglia F (2013) Programming the social computer. Phil Trans R Soc A 371(1987):20120379MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rodriguez S, Julián V, Bajo J, Carrascosa C, Botti V, Corchado JM (2011) Agent-based virtual organization architecture. Eng Appl Artif Intell 24(5):895–910CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Schuler D (1994) Social computing. Commun ACM 37(1):28–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Shilton K, Koepfler JA, Fleischmann KR (2014) How to see values in social computing: methods for studying values dimensions. In: Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing, ACM, pp 426–435Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tomás Pérez C, Pérez Vólquez A (2013) Evolución de la aportación de las redes sociales 2013. Observatorio de Innovación de Online Business SchoolGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Tumer K, Agogino A (2007) Distributed agent-based air traffic flow management. In: Proceedings of the 6th international joint conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems, ACM, p 255Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wang FY, Carley KM, Zeng D, Mao W (2007) Social computing: from social informatics to social intelligence. IEEE Intell Syst 22(2):79–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wu Y (2001) Exchange rates, stock prices, and money markets: evidence from singapore. J Asian Econ 12(3):445–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Salamanca, BISITE Research GroupSalamancaSpain

Personalised recommendations