Knowledge and Information Systems

, Volume 32, Issue 1, pp 53–76 | Cite as

Design and behavior study of a grammar-guided genetic programming algorithm for mining association rules

  • José M. Luna
  • José Raúl Romero
  • Sebastián Ventura
Regular Paper

Abstract

This paper presents a proposal for the extraction of association rules called G3PARM (Grammar-Guided Genetic Programming for Association Rule Mining) that makes the knowledge extracted more expressive and flexible. This algorithm allows a context-free grammar to be adapted and applied to each specific problem or domain and eliminates the problems raised by discretization. This proposal keeps the best individuals (those that exceed a certain threshold of support and confidence) obtained with the passing of generations in an auxiliary population of fixed size n. G3PARM obtains solutions within specified time limits and does not require the large amounts of memory that the exhaustive search algorithms in the field of association rules do. Our approach is compared to exhaustive search (Apriori and FP-Growth) and genetic (QuantMiner and ARMGA) algorithms for mining association rules and performs an analysis of the mined rules. Finally, a series of experiments serve to contrast the scalability of our algorithm. The proposal obtains a small set of rules with high support and confidence, over 90 and 99% respectively. Moreover, the resulting set of rules closely satisfies all the dataset instances. These results illustrate that our proposal is highly promising for the discovery of association rules in different types of datasets.

Keywords

Association rules Genetic programming Grammar-guided genetic programming Evolutionary algorithms 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Aggarwal C, Yu P (2010) On clustering massive text and categorical data streams. Knowl Inf Syst 24: 171–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Agrawal R, Srikant R (1994) Fast algorithms for mining association rules in large databases. In: VLDB’94. Proceedings of 20th international conference on very large data bases, Santiago de Chile, Chile, pp 487–499Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Alatas B, Akin E (2006) An efficient genetic algorithm for automated mining of both positive and negative quantitative association rules. Soft Comput 10: 230–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Borgelt C (2003) Efficient implementations of Apriori and Eclat. In: FIMI’03. 1st Workshop on frequent itemset mining implementations, Melbourne, Florida, USAGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chi Y, Wang H, Yu PS, Muntz RR (2006) Catch the momento: maintaining closed frequent itemsets over a data stream sliding window. Knowl Inf Syst 10(3): 265–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Coenen F, Goulbourne G, Leng P (2000) Algorithms for computing association rules using a partial- support tree. Knowl-Based Syst 13: 141–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Coenen F, Goulbourne G, Leng P (2003) Tree structures for mining association rules. Data Min Knowl Discov 8(1): 25–51MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Demšar J (2006) Statistical comparisons of classifiers over multiple data sets. J Mach Learn Res 7: 1–30MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Do TD, Hui SC, Fong ACM (2004) Mining association rules using relative confidence. In: IDEAL 2004, Proceedings of the 5th international conference on intelligent data engineering and automated learning, Exeter, UK, vol. 3177 of lecture notes in computer science, pp 306–313Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Domeniconi F, Tagarelli C, Gullo A (2009) Projective clustering ensembles. In: ICDM ’09, Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on data mining, Miami, USA, pp 794–799Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Eiben AE, Smith JE (2003) Introduction to evolutionary computing. Springer, New YorkMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Espejo PG, Ventura S, Herrera F (2010) A survey on the application of genetic programming to classification. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern C 40(2): 121–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Freitas AA (2002) Data mining and knowledge discovery with evolutionary algorithms. Springer, HeidelbergMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fukuda T, Morimoto Y, Morishita S, Tokuyama T (1996) Mining optimized association rules for numeric attributes. In: Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGACT-SIGMOD-SIGART symposium on principles of database systems, Montreal, Canada, ACM PressGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    García S, Molina D, Lozano M, Herrera F (2009) A study on the use of non-parametric tests for analyzing the evolutionary algorithms’ behavior: a case study on the CEC’2005 special session on real parameter optimization. J Heuristics 15(6): 617–644MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Goldberg DE (1989) Genetic algorithms in search, optimization and machine learning. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co, BostonMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Guan JW, Bell DA, Liu D (1989) Data mining for maximal frequent patterns in sequence groups. vol. 5 of studies in computational intelligence. Springer, New York, pp pp 137–161Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hájek P, Havel I, Chytil M (1966) The GUHA method of automatic hypotheses determination. Comput 1(4): 293–308MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Han J, Kamber M (2006) Data mining. Concepts and techniques. The Morgan Kaufmann series in data management systems, 2nd edition. Morgan Kaufmann, BurlingtonGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Han J, Pei J, Yin Y (2000) Mining frequent patterns without candidate generation. In: SIGMOD 2000, Proceedings of the 2000 ACM SIGMOD international conference on management of data, Dallas, Texas, USA, pp 1–12Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Han J, Pei J, Yin Y, Mao R (2004) Mining frequent patterns without candidate generation: a frequent-pattern tree approach. Data Min Knowl Discov 8: 53–87MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Holland JH (1992) Adaptation in natural and artificial systems. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kianmehr K, Alshalalfa M, Alhajj R (2010) Fuzzy clustering-based discretization for gene expression classification. Knowl Inf Syst 24: 441–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Koknar-Tezel S, Latecki L (2010) Improving SVM classification on imbalanced time series data sets with ghost points. Knowl Inf Syst, pp 1–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10115-010-0310-3
  25. 25.
    Koza JR (1992) Genetic programming: on the programming of computers by means of natural selection (complex adaptive systems). The MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Koza JR (2008) Introduction to genetic programming: tutorial. In: GECCO’08, Proceedings of the 10th annual conference on genetic and evolutionary computation Atlanta, Georgia, USA, ACM, pp 2299–2338Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lai PL, Chiu R, Hsu CC, Hsu CI (2003) The hybrid of association rule algorithms and genetic algorithms for tree induction: an example of predicting the student course performance. Expert Syst Appl 25(1): 51–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Liu H, Hussain F, Tan CL, Dash M (2002) Discretization: an enabling technique. Data Min Knowl Discov 6: 2393–2423MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Martin L, Leblanc R, Toan NK (1993) Tables for the Friedman rank test. Can J Stat 21(1): 39–43MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Mata J, Alvarez JL, Riquelme JC (2002) Discovering numeric association rules via evolutionary algorithm. vol. 2336/2002 of lecture notes in computer scienceGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Mata J, Alvarez JL, Riquelme JC (2001) Mining numeric association rules via evolutionary algorithm. In: ICANNGA’01, Proceedings of the 5th international conference on artificial neural networks and genetic algorithms, Prague, Czech Republic, pp 264–267Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    McKay R, Hoai N, Whigham P, Shan Y, ONeill M (2010) Grammar-based genetic programming: a survey. Genet Program Evolvable Mach 11: 365–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ordonez C, Ezquerra N, Santana CA (2006) Constraining and summarizing association rules in medical data. Knowl Inf Syst 9(3): 259–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ratle A, Sebag M (2000) Genetic programming and domain knowledge: beyond the limitations of grammar-guided machine discovery. In: PPSN VI. Proceedings of the 6th international conference on parallel problem solving from nature, Paris, France, pp 211–220Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Rauch J (2005) Logic of association rules. Appl Intell 22(1): 9–28MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Rodríguez-González A, Martínez-Trinidad J, Carrasco-Ochoa J, Ruiz-Shulcloper J (2010) RP-Miner: a relaxed prune algorithm for frequent similar pattern mining. Knowl Inf Syst 27(3): 1–21Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Salleb-Aouissi A, Vrain C, Nortet C (2007) QuantMiner: a genetic algorithm for mining quantitative association rules. In: IJCAI’97, Proceedings of the 20th international joint conference on artificial intelligence, Hyberadad, India, pp 1035–1040Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Schuster A, Wolff R, Trock D (2004) A high-performance distributed algorithm for mining association rules. Knowl Inf Syst 7(4): 458–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Srikant R, Agrawal R (1996) Mining quantitative association rules in large relational tables. In: SIGMOD’96, Proceedings of the 1996 ACM SIGMOD international conference on management of data, Montreal, Quebec, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Sucahyo YG, Gopalan RP (2004) Building a more accurate classifier based on strong frequent patterns. In: AJCAI 2004, Proceedings of the 17th Australian joint conference on artificial intelligence, Cairns, Australia, vol. 3339, pp 1036–1042Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Tsymbal A, Pechenizkiy M, Cunningham P (2005) Sequential genetic search for ensemble feature selection. In: IJCAI 2005, Proceedings of the 19th international joint conference on artificial intelligence, Edinburgh, Scotland, pp 877–882Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Ventura S, Romero C, Zafra A, Delgado JA, Hervás C (2007) JCLEC: a framework for evolutionary computation. vol.12 of soft computing. Springer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Yan X, Zhang C, Zhang S (2005) ARMGA: identifying interesting association rules with genetic algorithms. Appl Artif Intell 19(7): 677–689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Yan X, Zhang D, Zhang S (2009) Algorithm-based strategy for identifying association rules without specifying actual minimum support. Expert Syst Appl 36(2): 3066–3076CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • José M. Luna
    • 1
  • José Raúl Romero
    • 1
  • Sebastián Ventura
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer Science and Numerical AnalysisUniversity of CordobaCordobaSpain

Personalised recommendations